Deck 7: Locus and Concurrence

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
  Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Supply missing reasons for the following proof.
Given:   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> bisects   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> ;   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> and   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> Prove:   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> S1.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> bisects   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> ; R1.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> and   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> S2.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> R2.
S3.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> and   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> are rt.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> R3.
S4.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> R4.
S5.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> R5.
S6.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> R6.
S7.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.<div style=padding-top: 35px> R7.
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
  Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  <div style=padding-top: 35px>
Use the drawing provided to explain the following.
Given:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  <div style=padding-top: 35px> ,   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  <div style=padding-top: 35px> , and   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  <div style=padding-top: 35px> are the medians of   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  <div style=padding-top: 35px> Prove:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  <div style=padding-top: 35px>
Question
  Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof.
Given: Point X not on   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> so that   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> S1. R1.
S2.   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> R2.
S3. With M the midpoint of   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> , R3.
draw   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> S4. Then   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> R4.
S5. Also,   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> R5.
S6. R6. SSS
S7.   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment<div style=padding-top: 35px> R7.
S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment
Question
  Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem.
"The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent."
Given:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px> ,   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px> , and   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px> are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px> Prove:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px> ,   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px> , and   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z<div style=padding-top: 35px> are concurrent at point Z
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/4
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 7: Locus and Concurrence
1
  Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7.
Supply missing reasons for the following proof.
Given:   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. bisects   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. ;   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. and   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. Prove:   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. S1.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. bisects   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. ; R1.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. and   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. S2.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. R2.
S3.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. and   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. are rt.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. R3.
S4.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. R4.
S5.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. R5.
S6.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. R6.
S7.   Supply missing reasons for the following proof. Given:   bisects   ;   and   Prove:   S1.   bisects   ; R1.   and   S2.   R2. S3.   and   are rt.   R3. S4.   R4. S5.   R5. S6.   R6. S7.   R7. R7.
R1. Given
R2. Definition of angle-bisector
R3. Perpendicular lines form right angles.
R4. All right angles are congruent.
R5. Identity
R6. AAS
R7. CPCTC
2
  Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:
Use the drawing provided to explain the following.
Given:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  ,   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  , and   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  are the medians of   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:  Prove:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following. Given:   ,   , and   are the medians of   Prove:
If If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . , If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . , and If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . are the medians of If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . , then their point of concurrence is
Q, the centroid of If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . . It follows that If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . . By the Segment-Addition
Postulate, we have If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . . By substitution, If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . . By subtraction, If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . . In turn, If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . or 2. Multiplying the equation If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . by If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . , we have If   ,   , and   are the medians of   , then their point of concurrence is Q, the centroid of   . It follows that   . By the Segment-Addition Postulate, we have   . By substitution,   . By subtraction,   . In turn,   or 2. Multiplying the equation   by   , we have   . .
3
  Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment
Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof.
Given: Point X not on   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment so that   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment S1. R1.
S2.   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment R2.
S3. With M the midpoint of   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment , R3.
draw   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment S4. Then   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment R4.
S5. Also,   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment R5.
S6. R6. SSS
S7.   Supply missing statements and missing reasons for the following proof. Given: Point X not on   so that   Prove: X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of   S1. R1. S2.   R2. S3. With M the midpoint of   , R3. draw   S4. Then   R4. S5. Also,   R5. S6. R6. SSS S7.   R7. S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment R7.
S8. R8. Definition of perpendicular-bisector of a line segment
S1. Point X not on S1. Point X not on   so that   R1. Given R2. Definition of congruent line segments R3. Through 2 points, there is exactly one line. R4. Definition of midpoint of line segment R5. Identity S6.   R7. CPCTC S8. X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of  so that S1. Point X not on   so that   R1. Given R2. Definition of congruent line segments R3. Through 2 points, there is exactly one line. R4. Definition of midpoint of line segment R5. Identity S6.   R7. CPCTC S8. X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of  R1. Given
R2. Definition of congruent line segments
R3. Through 2 points, there is exactly one line.
R4. Definition of midpoint of line segment
R5. Identity
S6. S1. Point X not on   so that   R1. Given R2. Definition of congruent line segments R3. Through 2 points, there is exactly one line. R4. Definition of midpoint of line segment R5. Identity S6.   R7. CPCTC S8. X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of  R7. CPCTC
S8. X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of S1. Point X not on   so that   R1. Given R2. Definition of congruent line segments R3. Through 2 points, there is exactly one line. R4. Definition of midpoint of line segment R5. Identity S6.   R7. CPCTC S8. X lies on the perpendicular-bisector of
4
  Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z
Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem.
"The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent."
Given:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z ,   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z , and   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z Prove:   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z ,   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z , and   Use the drawing provided to explain the following theorem. The three angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent. Given:   ,   , and   are the angle bisectors of the angles of   Prove:   ,   , and   are concurrent at point Z are concurrent at point Z
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 4 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 4 flashcards in this deck.