Deck 7: The Fourth Amendment: an Overview of Constitutional Searches and Seizures

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
In Maslow's hierarchy of needs, which need comes right after the basic physical needs of food, clothing, and shelter?

A) love and companionship
B) security
C) freedom
D) laws and rules
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
One method courts use to determine reasonableness is the bright-line approach, which:

A) considers the totality of circumstances in each individual case.
B) assigns points to each indicia of reasonableness.
C) compares a case to other similar cases.
D) considers a specific rule that applies to all cases.
Question
Which of the following would not prove exigent circumstances to justify entry by police without first announcing their presence and purpose?

A) A crime is in progress.
B) The residents have a prior criminal history.
C) Making the officers' presence known would endanger them.
D) Evidence would be destroyed.
Question
In regard to the Fourth Amendment, what was the significance of the case of United States v. Jacobsen (1984)?

A) It held that an employee of a private company opening and inspecting the contents of a package is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
B) It held that airline employees working for the FAA represent government employees and must obtain a warrant before searching public bags.
C) It held that warrantless searches are allowed in public schools due to a loss of the expectation of privacy in a public setting such as a school, park, or playground.
D) It held that computer technicians are not required to obtain a warrant before notifying law enforcement of possible illegal material found on the item they are repairing.
Question
The section of the Fourth Amendment that makes warrantless searches and seizures constitutional, if they are sensible, is the:

A) warrant clause.
B) probable cause clause.
C) reasonableness clause.
D) privacy clause.
Question
In United States v. Banks, the Court held that officers must wait a reasonable amount of time after knocking and before forcible entry, and that a wait of_______________seconds (in this case) satisfied the Fourth Amendment.

A) 5 to 10
B) 15 to 20
C) 30 to 60
D) 60 to 120
Question
What was the significance of the Supreme Court overturning the State Supreme Court's findings in Florida v. Harris (2013)?

A) The Court found that the use of properly trained K-9 units to detect drugs warrants probable cause when the dogs alert to drugs on a person or property.
B) The Court overturned the State Supreme Court's ruling, which was that public school administrators have the right to search student lockers because the lockers are school property and any expectation of privacy is thus ignored.
C) The Court found that the use of undercover informants is admissible in court as long as the informants have not been paid to provide evidence.
D) The Court overturned the State Supreme Court's ruling, which was that police officers may not use smell to assume probable cause when detecting the use of marijuana in public settings.
Question
Which factor, found in U.S. v. Di Re (1948), may contribute to the finding of probable cause?

A) association with other known criminals
B) running from the crime scene
C) an admission of guilt
D) providing false or implausible answers to police questions
Question
Which of the following is not one of the five categories of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs?

A) social
B) physiological
C) self-actualization
D) attainment
Question
The most commonly used method to determine reasonableness is the case-by-case method, which:

A) considers the totality of circumstances in each individual case.
B) assigns points to each indicia of reasonableness.
C) compares a case to other similar cases.
D) considers a specific rule that applies to all cases.
Question
Concepts critical to understanding the Fourth Amendment include all of the following, except:

A) equability.
B) the reasonable expectation of privacy.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonableness.
Question
The landmark case of Terry v. Ohio is most known for including an explanation of:

A) stop and frisk.
B) the exclusionary rule.
C) imminent danger.
D) the fruit of the poisonous tree.
Question
Which of the following best describes the freedoms set forth by the Fourth Amendment?

A) freedom of speech
B) freedom from unreasonable search or seizure
C) freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
D) freedom to face one's accuser
Question
What level of proof is required for a Terry stop?

A) reasonable suspicion
B) a preponderance of the evidence
C) probable cause
D) No proof is required.
Question
All warrants are to be based on which concept associated with the Fourth Amendment?

A) equability
B) reasonable expectation of privacy
C) probable cause
D) reasonableness
Question
The exclusionary rule:

A) provides constitutional protections under the Fourth Amendment.
B) is a Congressionally created remedy.
C) was promulgated by the Senate.
D) safeguards rights through its deterrent effect.
Question
"Where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information is sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed" is the Supreme Court's definition of:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) probable cause.
C) a preponderance of the evidence.
D) beyond a reasonable doubt.
Question
The almost limitless variations of contacts between the public and the police, illustrating how justification for police action increases as their reasons build for thinking criminal activity is afoot, is represented by the:

A) continuum of contacts.
B) fruit of the poisonous tree.
C) range of suspicion.
D) preponderance of evidence.
Question
In which case did the Court hold that the individual's flight at the sight of police was enough to provide reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop?

A) Illinois v. Wardlow
B) Mapp v. Ohio
C) Terry v. Ohio
D) Weeks v. United States
Question
In Smith v. United States (1949), the Court defined which term as "The sum total of layers of information and the synthesis of what the police have heard, what they know, and what they observe as trained officers"?

A) reasonableness
B) probable cause
C) equability
D) reasonable expectation of privacy
Question
Although the intent of the Constitution is to prevent the government from intruding on people's lives when they have done nothing wrong, this freedom (as with all constitutional rights) is not absolute.
Question
The exception to the exclusionary rule that deems evidence admissible, even if seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, when it can be shown that the evidence would have been discovered through lawful means is the:

A) harmless error doctrine.
B) good faith exception.
C) inevitable discovery doctrine.
D) independent source doctrine.
Question
The Constitution does not provide an absolute right to be free from government intrusion, only from unreasonable interference.
Question
Government agents who have probable cause for believing that evidence of a crime is located at a specific place or that an individual is involved in a crime must go before a neutral and detached magistrate and swear under oath as to who or what they are looking for and where they think it can be found.
Question
In Murray v. United States (1988), the Court held that evidence initially seen during an illegal search, but later recovered under a valid warrant, would be inadmissible because of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.
Question
The Court has held that because a stop is considered an arrest, Miranda warnings must be given.
Question
If evidence that might otherwise fall victim to the exclusionary rule is obtained from a valid, independent source, that evidence can be admitted.
Question
In Rochin v. California, the Supreme Court held that searches that_______________are a violation of due process, and any evidence so obtained will, therefore, be inadmissible.

A) offend liberty
B) violate privacy
C) show a heedless disregard for civil rights
D) shock the conscience
Question
The exclusionary rule is by far the most frequently used means to address constitutional infractions by the government in criminal cases.
Question
In order to reduce the use of discretion by police officers and judges, the Supreme Court has developed a detailed formula for determining probable cause that universally fits all crimes.
Question
If a person is an employee of any governmental agency or is an agent of the government in any capacity, that person is bound by the Fourth Amendment.
Question
Deterring government misconduct is the primary purpose of the:

A) good faith exception.
B) exclusionary rule.
C) Supreme Court.
D) citizen review board.
Question
Which doctrine states that evidence obtained as a result of an earlier illegality must be excluded from trial?

A) prior taint
B) attenuation of the taint
C) fruit of the tainted seizure
D) fruit of the poisonous tree
Question
The Court devised the two-pronged test for using and gathering information from informants in Aguilar v. Texas (1964).
Question
The exclusionary rule applies in both criminal and civil trials in which a constitutional right has been violated.
Question
The Fourth Amendment restricts the actions of all U.S. citizens.
Question
In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000), a stop was held lawful because the suspect was in a high-crime area and fled upon seeing the police.
Question
The two basic source categories of probable cause are observational and informational.
Question
Instances in which police officers are not aware that they are violating Fourth Amendment principles involve an exception to the law referred to as:

A) the good faith doctrine.
B) the fruit of the poisonous tree.
C) shocking the conscience.
D) the innocence mind doctrine.
Question
The exclusionary rule goes back as far as 1886, when the Supreme Court held, in Boyd v. United States, that forced disclosure of papers evidencing a crime could not be admissible in court.
Question
The ________________ doctrine pertains to evidence obtained as a result of a previous constitutionally invalid activity and must be excluded from trial.
Question
In _____________________, the Court held that "The requirement of prior notice of authority and purpose before forcing entry into a home is deeply rooted in our heritage, and should not be given grudging application."
Question
The ________________________ is an exception to the exclusionary rule deeming evidence admissible, even if seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, when it can be shown that the evidence would have been discovered through lawful means.
Question
A _________ is a brief detention of a person, based on specific and articulable facts, for the purpose of investigating suspicious activity.
Question
In the _______________ principle, a legal assessment is made based on the sum total of layers of information and the synthesis of what the police have heard, what they know, and what they observe as trained officers.
Question
A _____________ is the taking of contraband, evidence of a crime, or a person into custody by law enforcement, which is regulated by the Fourth Amendment.
Question
The_______________ method is most commonly used in the courts for determining the reasonableness of an action by considering the totality of circumstances in each case.
Question
The Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §1997, was passed in 1980, with the purposes of reducing acts of abuse and excessive use of force, and of correcting deplorable living conditions of inmates.
Question
The good faith exception does not extend to the execution of arrest warrants or search warrants if police officers are not aware that they are violating Fourth Amendment principles.
Question
The _________________ represents the almost limitless variations of interactions between the public and the police, and illustrates how justification for police action increases as their reasons build for thinking criminal activity is afoot.
Question
________________ exists when facts and circumstances are sufficient in themselves to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been or is being committed.
Question
A ______________ is an examination of a person, place, or vehicle for contraband or evidence of a crime.
Question
The primary purpose of having a neutral magistrate is to remove from the police the responsibility of determining probable cause.
Question
Detective Klenowski and Detective Bell discover an illegal gambling racket occurring in a backroom apartment at a local bar. Because the illegal activity primarily happens at night, they ask the magistrate for a _________________ warrant.
Question
Actions described in clear, distinct statements are referred to as __________________.
Question
If a civil liability suit against the government is won, the plaintiff's lawyer's fees are paid by the defendant, making this avenue of litigation attractive for attorneys.
Question
One of the driving forces behind the Revolution was strong opposition to indiscriminate and baseless government searches and seizures, including ______________, which were used by revenue officers to search ships and other water vessels, as well as homes and businesses, for evidence of smuggled goods or goods on which taxes had not been paid.
Question
Until the 1960s, the Court used the ____________________ approach, viewing the Reasonableness Clause and the Warrant Clause as intertwined and firmly connected.
Question
If the police want to make an unannounced entrance because they fear evidence might be destroyed or officers might not be safe, they typically request a ___________________.
Question
The harmless error exception was first set forth by the Court in Chapman v. California (1967).
Question
U.S. society is prone to suing, making it known as a _________________ society, and the police are an attractive target because they wield power and are public employees.
Question
You are the chief of police in your community and are quite concerned about a recent spike in criminal misconduct in the east part of town. Community leaders are constantly calling your office to complain. You decide that you should have a strong police presence on the streets, and you direct your officers to walk the beat in the east part of town, rather than use patrol cars. You also direct your police officers to vigorously try to prevent crime by acting proactively, stopping individuals who seem out of place or apprehensive when they see police officers. As a result, many of these contacts have resulted in stop-and-frisk activities by the police, and crime has dropped significantly in the east part of town. However, now you're getting calls from citizens in the east asking why a disproportionate number of minorities are being stopped and frisked by the police. You have decided to meet with the community leaders to answer this latest concern. What will you tell them?
Question
You are a legislator and have been reading in the paper about a notorious crime in the capital city. The defendant was acquitted of murder charges, because her confession was determined inadmissible at trial due to a violation of the her rights. Like everyone else in the state, you are very angry about what has happened. You understand the exclusionary rule, but you feel that it simply goes too far and has let a terrible murderer free to walk the streets. You have decided to come up with a state law to address this issue and make sure that this will never happen again. Explain the nature of a state law that would address this issue, justify its use rather than the exclusionary rule, and discuss any possible negative consequences that may result from its use.
Question
Describe two exceptions to the exclusionary rule. Use case law to further illustrate your point.
Question
Select any two of the Supreme Court cases discussed in the text-one relevant to the exclusionary rule and one relevant to the good faith exception-and describe the similarities and differences in the Court's opinion in relation to the Fourth Amendment.
Question
Instances in which police officers are not aware that they are violating Fourth Amendment principles may result in the use of the __________________ exception for the Court to allow the evidence.
Question
A __________________ is not judicially enforced but does have an appointed monitor who makes quarterly reports.
Question
Explain reasonable suspicion.
Question
Explain the law of stop and frisk, and why it is needed.
Question
A _______________ is a court-enforced agreement with oversight provided by a federal judge.
Question
In instances in which the preponderance of evidence suggests the defendant's guilt and tainted evidence is not critical to proving the case against the defendant, the _____________applies.
Question
The Fourth Amendment contains two clauses of importance to search-and-seizure issues. List the two clauses and describe their relevance.
Question
Explain informational and observational probable cause.
Question
Discuss the exclusionary rule.
Question
Explain what is meant by "the continuum of contacts."
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/75
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 7: The Fourth Amendment: an Overview of Constitutional Searches and Seizures
1
In Maslow's hierarchy of needs, which need comes right after the basic physical needs of food, clothing, and shelter?

A) love and companionship
B) security
C) freedom
D) laws and rules
B
2
One method courts use to determine reasonableness is the bright-line approach, which:

A) considers the totality of circumstances in each individual case.
B) assigns points to each indicia of reasonableness.
C) compares a case to other similar cases.
D) considers a specific rule that applies to all cases.
D
3
Which of the following would not prove exigent circumstances to justify entry by police without first announcing their presence and purpose?

A) A crime is in progress.
B) The residents have a prior criminal history.
C) Making the officers' presence known would endanger them.
D) Evidence would be destroyed.
B
4
In regard to the Fourth Amendment, what was the significance of the case of United States v. Jacobsen (1984)?

A) It held that an employee of a private company opening and inspecting the contents of a package is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
B) It held that airline employees working for the FAA represent government employees and must obtain a warrant before searching public bags.
C) It held that warrantless searches are allowed in public schools due to a loss of the expectation of privacy in a public setting such as a school, park, or playground.
D) It held that computer technicians are not required to obtain a warrant before notifying law enforcement of possible illegal material found on the item they are repairing.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
The section of the Fourth Amendment that makes warrantless searches and seizures constitutional, if they are sensible, is the:

A) warrant clause.
B) probable cause clause.
C) reasonableness clause.
D) privacy clause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
In United States v. Banks, the Court held that officers must wait a reasonable amount of time after knocking and before forcible entry, and that a wait of_______________seconds (in this case) satisfied the Fourth Amendment.

A) 5 to 10
B) 15 to 20
C) 30 to 60
D) 60 to 120
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
What was the significance of the Supreme Court overturning the State Supreme Court's findings in Florida v. Harris (2013)?

A) The Court found that the use of properly trained K-9 units to detect drugs warrants probable cause when the dogs alert to drugs on a person or property.
B) The Court overturned the State Supreme Court's ruling, which was that public school administrators have the right to search student lockers because the lockers are school property and any expectation of privacy is thus ignored.
C) The Court found that the use of undercover informants is admissible in court as long as the informants have not been paid to provide evidence.
D) The Court overturned the State Supreme Court's ruling, which was that police officers may not use smell to assume probable cause when detecting the use of marijuana in public settings.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Which factor, found in U.S. v. Di Re (1948), may contribute to the finding of probable cause?

A) association with other known criminals
B) running from the crime scene
C) an admission of guilt
D) providing false or implausible answers to police questions
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
Which of the following is not one of the five categories of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs?

A) social
B) physiological
C) self-actualization
D) attainment
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
The most commonly used method to determine reasonableness is the case-by-case method, which:

A) considers the totality of circumstances in each individual case.
B) assigns points to each indicia of reasonableness.
C) compares a case to other similar cases.
D) considers a specific rule that applies to all cases.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
Concepts critical to understanding the Fourth Amendment include all of the following, except:

A) equability.
B) the reasonable expectation of privacy.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonableness.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
The landmark case of Terry v. Ohio is most known for including an explanation of:

A) stop and frisk.
B) the exclusionary rule.
C) imminent danger.
D) the fruit of the poisonous tree.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Which of the following best describes the freedoms set forth by the Fourth Amendment?

A) freedom of speech
B) freedom from unreasonable search or seizure
C) freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
D) freedom to face one's accuser
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
What level of proof is required for a Terry stop?

A) reasonable suspicion
B) a preponderance of the evidence
C) probable cause
D) No proof is required.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
All warrants are to be based on which concept associated with the Fourth Amendment?

A) equability
B) reasonable expectation of privacy
C) probable cause
D) reasonableness
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
The exclusionary rule:

A) provides constitutional protections under the Fourth Amendment.
B) is a Congressionally created remedy.
C) was promulgated by the Senate.
D) safeguards rights through its deterrent effect.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
"Where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information is sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed" is the Supreme Court's definition of:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) probable cause.
C) a preponderance of the evidence.
D) beyond a reasonable doubt.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
The almost limitless variations of contacts between the public and the police, illustrating how justification for police action increases as their reasons build for thinking criminal activity is afoot, is represented by the:

A) continuum of contacts.
B) fruit of the poisonous tree.
C) range of suspicion.
D) preponderance of evidence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
In which case did the Court hold that the individual's flight at the sight of police was enough to provide reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop?

A) Illinois v. Wardlow
B) Mapp v. Ohio
C) Terry v. Ohio
D) Weeks v. United States
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
In Smith v. United States (1949), the Court defined which term as "The sum total of layers of information and the synthesis of what the police have heard, what they know, and what they observe as trained officers"?

A) reasonableness
B) probable cause
C) equability
D) reasonable expectation of privacy
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
Although the intent of the Constitution is to prevent the government from intruding on people's lives when they have done nothing wrong, this freedom (as with all constitutional rights) is not absolute.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
The exception to the exclusionary rule that deems evidence admissible, even if seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, when it can be shown that the evidence would have been discovered through lawful means is the:

A) harmless error doctrine.
B) good faith exception.
C) inevitable discovery doctrine.
D) independent source doctrine.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
The Constitution does not provide an absolute right to be free from government intrusion, only from unreasonable interference.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
Government agents who have probable cause for believing that evidence of a crime is located at a specific place or that an individual is involved in a crime must go before a neutral and detached magistrate and swear under oath as to who or what they are looking for and where they think it can be found.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
In Murray v. United States (1988), the Court held that evidence initially seen during an illegal search, but later recovered under a valid warrant, would be inadmissible because of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
The Court has held that because a stop is considered an arrest, Miranda warnings must be given.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
If evidence that might otherwise fall victim to the exclusionary rule is obtained from a valid, independent source, that evidence can be admitted.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
In Rochin v. California, the Supreme Court held that searches that_______________are a violation of due process, and any evidence so obtained will, therefore, be inadmissible.

A) offend liberty
B) violate privacy
C) show a heedless disregard for civil rights
D) shock the conscience
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
The exclusionary rule is by far the most frequently used means to address constitutional infractions by the government in criminal cases.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
In order to reduce the use of discretion by police officers and judges, the Supreme Court has developed a detailed formula for determining probable cause that universally fits all crimes.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
If a person is an employee of any governmental agency or is an agent of the government in any capacity, that person is bound by the Fourth Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
Deterring government misconduct is the primary purpose of the:

A) good faith exception.
B) exclusionary rule.
C) Supreme Court.
D) citizen review board.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
Which doctrine states that evidence obtained as a result of an earlier illegality must be excluded from trial?

A) prior taint
B) attenuation of the taint
C) fruit of the tainted seizure
D) fruit of the poisonous tree
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
The Court devised the two-pronged test for using and gathering information from informants in Aguilar v. Texas (1964).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
The exclusionary rule applies in both criminal and civil trials in which a constitutional right has been violated.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
The Fourth Amendment restricts the actions of all U.S. citizens.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000), a stop was held lawful because the suspect was in a high-crime area and fled upon seeing the police.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
The two basic source categories of probable cause are observational and informational.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
39
Instances in which police officers are not aware that they are violating Fourth Amendment principles involve an exception to the law referred to as:

A) the good faith doctrine.
B) the fruit of the poisonous tree.
C) shocking the conscience.
D) the innocence mind doctrine.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
40
The exclusionary rule goes back as far as 1886, when the Supreme Court held, in Boyd v. United States, that forced disclosure of papers evidencing a crime could not be admissible in court.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
41
The ________________ doctrine pertains to evidence obtained as a result of a previous constitutionally invalid activity and must be excluded from trial.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
42
In _____________________, the Court held that "The requirement of prior notice of authority and purpose before forcing entry into a home is deeply rooted in our heritage, and should not be given grudging application."
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
43
The ________________________ is an exception to the exclusionary rule deeming evidence admissible, even if seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, when it can be shown that the evidence would have been discovered through lawful means.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
44
A _________ is a brief detention of a person, based on specific and articulable facts, for the purpose of investigating suspicious activity.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
45
In the _______________ principle, a legal assessment is made based on the sum total of layers of information and the synthesis of what the police have heard, what they know, and what they observe as trained officers.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
46
A _____________ is the taking of contraband, evidence of a crime, or a person into custody by law enforcement, which is regulated by the Fourth Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
47
The_______________ method is most commonly used in the courts for determining the reasonableness of an action by considering the totality of circumstances in each case.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
48
The Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §1997, was passed in 1980, with the purposes of reducing acts of abuse and excessive use of force, and of correcting deplorable living conditions of inmates.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
49
The good faith exception does not extend to the execution of arrest warrants or search warrants if police officers are not aware that they are violating Fourth Amendment principles.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
50
The _________________ represents the almost limitless variations of interactions between the public and the police, and illustrates how justification for police action increases as their reasons build for thinking criminal activity is afoot.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
51
________________ exists when facts and circumstances are sufficient in themselves to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been or is being committed.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
52
A ______________ is an examination of a person, place, or vehicle for contraband or evidence of a crime.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
53
The primary purpose of having a neutral magistrate is to remove from the police the responsibility of determining probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
54
Detective Klenowski and Detective Bell discover an illegal gambling racket occurring in a backroom apartment at a local bar. Because the illegal activity primarily happens at night, they ask the magistrate for a _________________ warrant.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
55
Actions described in clear, distinct statements are referred to as __________________.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
56
If a civil liability suit against the government is won, the plaintiff's lawyer's fees are paid by the defendant, making this avenue of litigation attractive for attorneys.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
57
One of the driving forces behind the Revolution was strong opposition to indiscriminate and baseless government searches and seizures, including ______________, which were used by revenue officers to search ships and other water vessels, as well as homes and businesses, for evidence of smuggled goods or goods on which taxes had not been paid.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
58
Until the 1960s, the Court used the ____________________ approach, viewing the Reasonableness Clause and the Warrant Clause as intertwined and firmly connected.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
59
If the police want to make an unannounced entrance because they fear evidence might be destroyed or officers might not be safe, they typically request a ___________________.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
60
The harmless error exception was first set forth by the Court in Chapman v. California (1967).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
61
U.S. society is prone to suing, making it known as a _________________ society, and the police are an attractive target because they wield power and are public employees.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
62
You are the chief of police in your community and are quite concerned about a recent spike in criminal misconduct in the east part of town. Community leaders are constantly calling your office to complain. You decide that you should have a strong police presence on the streets, and you direct your officers to walk the beat in the east part of town, rather than use patrol cars. You also direct your police officers to vigorously try to prevent crime by acting proactively, stopping individuals who seem out of place or apprehensive when they see police officers. As a result, many of these contacts have resulted in stop-and-frisk activities by the police, and crime has dropped significantly in the east part of town. However, now you're getting calls from citizens in the east asking why a disproportionate number of minorities are being stopped and frisked by the police. You have decided to meet with the community leaders to answer this latest concern. What will you tell them?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
63
You are a legislator and have been reading in the paper about a notorious crime in the capital city. The defendant was acquitted of murder charges, because her confession was determined inadmissible at trial due to a violation of the her rights. Like everyone else in the state, you are very angry about what has happened. You understand the exclusionary rule, but you feel that it simply goes too far and has let a terrible murderer free to walk the streets. You have decided to come up with a state law to address this issue and make sure that this will never happen again. Explain the nature of a state law that would address this issue, justify its use rather than the exclusionary rule, and discuss any possible negative consequences that may result from its use.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
64
Describe two exceptions to the exclusionary rule. Use case law to further illustrate your point.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
65
Select any two of the Supreme Court cases discussed in the text-one relevant to the exclusionary rule and one relevant to the good faith exception-and describe the similarities and differences in the Court's opinion in relation to the Fourth Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
66
Instances in which police officers are not aware that they are violating Fourth Amendment principles may result in the use of the __________________ exception for the Court to allow the evidence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
67
A __________________ is not judicially enforced but does have an appointed monitor who makes quarterly reports.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
68
Explain reasonable suspicion.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
69
Explain the law of stop and frisk, and why it is needed.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
70
A _______________ is a court-enforced agreement with oversight provided by a federal judge.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
71
In instances in which the preponderance of evidence suggests the defendant's guilt and tainted evidence is not critical to proving the case against the defendant, the _____________applies.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
72
The Fourth Amendment contains two clauses of importance to search-and-seizure issues. List the two clauses and describe their relevance.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
73
Explain informational and observational probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
74
Discuss the exclusionary rule.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
75
Explain what is meant by "the continuum of contacts."
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 75 flashcards in this deck.