Deck 15: Negligence: Defenses

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
Before comparative negligence was adopted, contributory negligence barred recovery in most cases.
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
The last clear chance rule

A) is an offset against comparative negligence
B) applies only if there is an assumption of the risk
C) can prevent contributory negligence from barring recovery by the plaintiff
D) establishes strict liability
Question
In a case of secondary assumption of the risk, the fault of the plaintiff is compared to that of the defendant and the damages are allocated according to the comparison of fault.
Question
Contributory negligence is determined by an objective test, while assumption of the risk is determined by a subjective test.
Question
The failure of the plaintiff to take reasonable steps to avoid the consequence of the defendant's negligence is an example of contributory negligence.
Question
Match between columns
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
contributory negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
avoidable consequences
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
express assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
defense
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
ordinary negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
public policy
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
comparative negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
adhesion contract
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
last clear chance
Question
In contributory negligence, the damages between the plaintiff and defendant are allocated according to their relative fault.
Question
Under the defense of contributory negligence

A) The defendant's unreasonableness bars the plaintiff's recovery.
B) Recovery by the plaintiff is not defeated.
C) The defendant's unreasonableness is compared to that of the plaintiff.
D) Recovery by the plaintiff is defeated.
Question
Match between columns
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
contributory negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
avoidable consequences
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
express assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
defense
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
ordinary negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
public policy
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
comparative negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
adhesion contract
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
last clear chance
Question
Match between columns
damages allocated according to relative fault
contributory negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
avoidable consequences
damages allocated according to relative fault
assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
express assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
defense
damages allocated according to relative fault
ordinary negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
public policy
damages allocated according to relative fault
comparative negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
adhesion contract
damages allocated according to relative fault
last clear chance
Question
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff should have known of the danger to him- or herself.
Question
In an express assumption of the risk, the victim knowingly and voluntarily accepts the risk by express agreement.
Question
Under comparative negligence

A) The plaintiff's recovery is barred.
B) The plaintiff's recovery can be reduced in proportion to the fault of the parties.
C) The plaintiff's recovery can be increased in proportion if the defendant was negligent per se.
D) Recovery is not barred if there was an assumption of the risk.
Question
Match between columns
customs and societal values
contributory negligence
customs and societal values
avoidable consequences
customs and societal values
assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
express assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
defense
customs and societal values
ordinary negligence
customs and societal values
public policy
customs and societal values
comparative negligence
customs and societal values
adhesion contract
customs and societal values
last clear chance
Question
The reason that primary assumption of the risk is a complete defense (and not a basis for comparative fault) is that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted a particular risk that the defendant did not have a duty to protect the plaintiff against.
Question
________ negligence is the failure to use even a small amount of care to avoid foreseeable harm.
Question
Match between columns
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
contributory negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
avoidable consequences
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
express assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
defense
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
ordinary negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
public policy
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
comparative negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
adhesion contract
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
last clear chance
Question
Match between columns
a response stating why a claim should be denied
contributory negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
avoidable consequences
a response stating why a claim should be denied
assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
express assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
defense
a response stating why a claim should be denied
ordinary negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
public policy
a response stating why a claim should be denied
comparative negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
adhesion contract
a response stating why a claim should be denied
last clear chance
Question
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff knew about and accepted the danger.
Question
The two major categories of comparative negligence are ________ comparative negligence and ________ comparative negligence.
Question
After the adoption of comparative negligence, why is there no longer a need for the last clear chance defense?
Question
Give an example of an express assumption of the risk that violates public policy and hence is invalid.
Question
Match between columns
contractual limitation of liability
contributory negligence
contractual limitation of liability
avoidable consequences
contractual limitation of liability
assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
express assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
defense
contractual limitation of liability
ordinary negligence
contractual limitation of liability
public policy
contractual limitation of liability
comparative negligence
contractual limitation of liability
adhesion contract
contractual limitation of liability
last clear chance
Question
Match between columns
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
contributory negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
avoidable consequences
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
express assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
defense
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
ordinary negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
public policy
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
comparative negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
adhesion contract
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
last clear chance
Question
Distinguish between primary assumption of the risk and secondary assumption of the risk.
Question
Match between columns
mitigation of damages
contributory negligence
mitigation of damages
avoidable consequences
mitigation of damages
assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
express assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
defense
mitigation of damages
ordinary negligence
mitigation of damages
public policy
mitigation of damages
comparative negligence
mitigation of damages
adhesion contract
mitigation of damages
last clear chance
Question
Define comparative negligence.
Question
What is an adhesion contract?
Question
Match between columns
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
contributory negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
avoidable consequences
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
express assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
defense
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
ordinary negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
public policy
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
comparative negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
adhesion contract
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/29
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 15: Negligence: Defenses
1
Before comparative negligence was adopted, contributory negligence barred recovery in most cases.
True
2
The last clear chance rule

A) is an offset against comparative negligence
B) applies only if there is an assumption of the risk
C) can prevent contributory negligence from barring recovery by the plaintiff
D) establishes strict liability
C
3
In a case of secondary assumption of the risk, the fault of the plaintiff is compared to that of the defendant and the damages are allocated according to the comparison of fault.
True
4
Contributory negligence is determined by an objective test, while assumption of the risk is determined by a subjective test.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
The failure of the plaintiff to take reasonable steps to avoid the consequence of the defendant's negligence is an example of contributory negligence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Match between columns
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
contributory negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
avoidable consequences
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
express assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
defense
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
ordinary negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
public policy
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
comparative negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
adhesion contract
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
In contributory negligence, the damages between the plaintiff and defendant are allocated according to their relative fault.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Under the defense of contributory negligence

A) The defendant's unreasonableness bars the plaintiff's recovery.
B) Recovery by the plaintiff is not defeated.
C) The defendant's unreasonableness is compared to that of the plaintiff.
D) Recovery by the plaintiff is defeated.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
Match between columns
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
contributory negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
avoidable consequences
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
express assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
defense
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
ordinary negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
public policy
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
comparative negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
adhesion contract
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Match between columns
damages allocated according to relative fault
contributory negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
avoidable consequences
damages allocated according to relative fault
assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
express assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
defense
damages allocated according to relative fault
ordinary negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
public policy
damages allocated according to relative fault
comparative negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
adhesion contract
damages allocated according to relative fault
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff should have known of the danger to him- or herself.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
In an express assumption of the risk, the victim knowingly and voluntarily accepts the risk by express agreement.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Under comparative negligence

A) The plaintiff's recovery is barred.
B) The plaintiff's recovery can be reduced in proportion to the fault of the parties.
C) The plaintiff's recovery can be increased in proportion if the defendant was negligent per se.
D) Recovery is not barred if there was an assumption of the risk.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Match between columns
customs and societal values
contributory negligence
customs and societal values
avoidable consequences
customs and societal values
assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
express assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
defense
customs and societal values
ordinary negligence
customs and societal values
public policy
customs and societal values
comparative negligence
customs and societal values
adhesion contract
customs and societal values
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
The reason that primary assumption of the risk is a complete defense (and not a basis for comparative fault) is that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted a particular risk that the defendant did not have a duty to protect the plaintiff against.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
________ negligence is the failure to use even a small amount of care to avoid foreseeable harm.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
Match between columns
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
contributory negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
avoidable consequences
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
express assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
defense
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
ordinary negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
public policy
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
comparative negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
adhesion contract
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
Match between columns
a response stating why a claim should be denied
contributory negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
avoidable consequences
a response stating why a claim should be denied
assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
express assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
defense
a response stating why a claim should be denied
ordinary negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
public policy
a response stating why a claim should be denied
comparative negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
adhesion contract
a response stating why a claim should be denied
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff knew about and accepted the danger.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
The two major categories of comparative negligence are ________ comparative negligence and ________ comparative negligence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
After the adoption of comparative negligence, why is there no longer a need for the last clear chance defense?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
Give an example of an express assumption of the risk that violates public policy and hence is invalid.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
Match between columns
contractual limitation of liability
contributory negligence
contractual limitation of liability
avoidable consequences
contractual limitation of liability
assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
express assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
defense
contractual limitation of liability
ordinary negligence
contractual limitation of liability
public policy
contractual limitation of liability
comparative negligence
contractual limitation of liability
adhesion contract
contractual limitation of liability
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
Match between columns
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
contributory negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
avoidable consequences
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
express assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
defense
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
ordinary negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
public policy
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
comparative negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
adhesion contract
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
Distinguish between primary assumption of the risk and secondary assumption of the risk.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
Match between columns
mitigation of damages
contributory negligence
mitigation of damages
avoidable consequences
mitigation of damages
assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
express assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
defense
mitigation of damages
ordinary negligence
mitigation of damages
public policy
mitigation of damages
comparative negligence
mitigation of damages
adhesion contract
mitigation of damages
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
Define comparative negligence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
What is an adhesion contract?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
Match between columns
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
contributory negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
avoidable consequences
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
express assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
defense
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
ordinary negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
public policy
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
comparative negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
adhesion contract
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
last clear chance
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 29 flashcards in this deck.