Deck 20: Defamation

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
On a Google forum, Oliver calls Jim a wife-beater.________

A) Google and Oliver have defamed Jim.
B) Google but not Oliver has defamed Jim.
C) Oliver but not Google has defamed Jim.
D) The statement is a protected opinion.
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
Providers of interactive computer services on the Internet have an immunity from tort liability based on defamatory statements made by others on the online service of the providers.
Question
Extrinsic facts may need to be pleaded in the colloquium of the complaint to establish that the defamatory statement was of and concerning the plaintiff.
Question
Alice is the mayor of the city. The local newspaper publishes a story that falsely accuses Alice of unethical behavior.________.

A) The newspaper must prove that it was unaware of the falsity of the story.
B) Alice can win only if she proves that the newspaper published the story with actual malice.
C) The newspaper must prove that it was no more than negligent in printing the story.
D) Alice can win if she proves that the newspaper published the story negligently.
Question
Defamation consists of two separate torts: libel and slander.
Question
Defamatory opinions can never be actionable.
Question
Match between columns
oral defamation that is not slander per se
privilege
oral defamation that is not slander per se
fact
oral defamation that is not slander per se
fair comment
oral defamation that is not slander per se
extrinsic fact
oral defamation that is not slander per se
public figure
oral defamation that is not slander per se
libel
oral defamation that is not slander per se
actual malice
oral defamation that is not slander per se
publication
oral defamation that is not slander per se
opinion
oral defamation that is not slander per se
inducement
oral defamation that is not slander per se
slander per se
oral defamation that is not slander per se
special damages
oral defamation that is not slander per se
SLAPP suit
oral defamation that is not slander per se
public official
oral defamation that is not slander per se
slander per quod
Question
Extrinsic facts are needed only for statements that are defamatory on their face.
Question
Match between columns
government employee
privilege
government employee
fact
government employee
fair comment
government employee
extrinsic fact
government employee
public figure
government employee
libel
government employee
actual malice
government employee
publication
government employee
opinion
government employee
inducement
government employee
slander per se
government employee
special damages
government employee
SLAPP suit
government employee
public official
government employee
slander per quod
Question
Match between columns
retaliatory action
privilege
retaliatory action
fact
retaliatory action
fair comment
retaliatory action
extrinsic fact
retaliatory action
public figure
retaliatory action
libel
retaliatory action
actual malice
retaliatory action
publication
retaliatory action
opinion
retaliatory action
inducement
retaliatory action
slander per se
retaliatory action
special damages
retaliatory action
SLAPP suit
retaliatory action
public official
retaliatory action
slander per quod
Question
A qualified privilege can be lost if it is not exercised in a reasonable manner for a proper purpose.
Question
Actual malice must always be proven by any plaintiff who sues the media for defamation.
Question
Match between columns
actual economic losses
privilege
actual economic losses
fact
actual economic losses
fair comment
actual economic losses
extrinsic fact
actual economic losses
public figure
actual economic losses
libel
actual economic losses
actual malice
actual economic losses
publication
actual economic losses
opinion
actual economic losses
inducement
actual economic losses
slander per se
actual economic losses
special damages
actual economic losses
SLAPP suit
actual economic losses
public official
actual economic losses
slander per quod
Question
Charles, a weight lifter, sues Greg for slander when Greg tells Charles that he "obviously takes illegal steroids."________

A) There was no slander because the statement was an opinion.
B) There was no slander because Charles was a public figure.
C) There was no slander because extrinsic facts are needed to understand the defamatory meaning.
D) There was no slander because the statement was not published.
Question
Match between columns
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
privilege
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
fact
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
fair comment
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
extrinsic fact
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
public figure
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
libel
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
actual malice
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
publication
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
opinion
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
inducement
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
slander per se
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
special damages
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
SLAPP suit
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
public official
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
slander per quod
Question
A fact is a statement that can be objectively established as true or false.
Question
Match between columns
a portion of the defamation complaint
privilege
a portion of the defamation complaint
fact
a portion of the defamation complaint
fair comment
a portion of the defamation complaint
extrinsic fact
a portion of the defamation complaint
public figure
a portion of the defamation complaint
libel
a portion of the defamation complaint
actual malice
a portion of the defamation complaint
publication
a portion of the defamation complaint
opinion
a portion of the defamation complaint
inducement
a portion of the defamation complaint
slander per se
a portion of the defamation complaint
special damages
a portion of the defamation complaint
SLAPP suit
a portion of the defamation complaint
public official
a portion of the defamation complaint
slander per quod
Question
What is fair comment, and when does it prevent liability for defamation?
Question
What is a public figure? What two kinds exist?
Question
Who has an absolute privilege to defame?
Question
What is a private person?
Question
Match between columns
not objectively verifiable
privilege
not objectively verifiable
fact
not objectively verifiable
fair comment
not objectively verifiable
extrinsic fact
not objectively verifiable
public figure
not objectively verifiable
libel
not objectively verifiable
actual malice
not objectively verifiable
publication
not objectively verifiable
opinion
not objectively verifiable
inducement
not objectively verifiable
slander per se
not objectively verifiable
special damages
not objectively verifiable
SLAPP suit
not objectively verifiable
public official
not objectively verifiable
slander per quod
Question
When do those who merely deliver or transmit the defamatory statement, such as bookstores, become liable?
Question
Match between columns
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
privilege
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
fact
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
fair comment
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
extrinsic fact
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
public figure
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
libel
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
actual malice
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
publication
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
opinion
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
inducement
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
slander per se
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
special damages
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
SLAPP suit
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
public official
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
slander per quod
Question
Match between columns
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
privilege
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
fact
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
fair comment
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
extrinsic fact
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
public figure
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
libel
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
actual malice
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
publication
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
opinion
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
inducement
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
slander per se
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
special damages
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
SLAPP suit
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
public official
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
slander per quod
Question
In a suit against the media by a public official or public figure, what must be proven if the defamatory statement pertained to a matter of public concern?
Question
A defendant can make a false statement innocently or by fault. List three possible standards of fault.
Question
Publication is an element of libel or slander. When does publication occur?
Question
In a suit against the media by a public official or public figure, what must be proven if the defamatory statement pertained to a matter of private concern?
Question
Match between columns
written defamation
privilege
written defamation
fact
written defamation
fair comment
written defamation
extrinsic fact
written defamation
public figure
written defamation
libel
written defamation
actual malice
written defamation
publication
written defamation
opinion
written defamation
inducement
written defamation
slander per se
written defamation
special damages
written defamation
SLAPP suit
written defamation
public official
written defamation
slander per quod
Question
Match between columns
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
privilege
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
fact
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
fair comment
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
extrinsic fact
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
public figure
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
libel
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
actual malice
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
publication
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
opinion
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
inducement
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
slander per se
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
special damages
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
SLAPP suit
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
public official
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
slander per quod
Question
When is a statement of fact defamatory?
Question
What is a SLAPP suit?
Question
Match between columns
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
privilege
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
fact
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
fair comment
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
extrinsic fact
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
public figure
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
libel
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
actual malice
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
publication
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
opinion
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
inducement
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
slander per se
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
special damages
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
SLAPP suit
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
public official
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
slander per quod
Question
What is a public official?
Question
Match between columns
privilege protecting opinion
privilege
privilege protecting opinion
fact
privilege protecting opinion
fair comment
privilege protecting opinion
extrinsic fact
privilege protecting opinion
public figure
privilege protecting opinion
libel
privilege protecting opinion
actual malice
privilege protecting opinion
publication
privilege protecting opinion
opinion
privilege protecting opinion
inducement
privilege protecting opinion
slander per se
privilege protecting opinion
special damages
privilege protecting opinion
SLAPP suit
privilege protecting opinion
public official
privilege protecting opinion
slander per quod
Question
Match between columns
objectively verifiable
privilege
objectively verifiable
fact
objectively verifiable
fair comment
objectively verifiable
extrinsic fact
objectively verifiable
public figure
objectively verifiable
libel
objectively verifiable
actual malice
objectively verifiable
publication
objectively verifiable
opinion
objectively verifiable
inducement
objectively verifiable
slander per se
objectively verifiable
special damages
objectively verifiable
SLAPP suit
objectively verifiable
public official
objectively verifiable
slander per quod
Question
Match between columns
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
privilege
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
fact
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
fair comment
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
extrinsic fact
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
public figure
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
libel
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
actual malice
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
publication
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
opinion
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
inducement
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
slander per se
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
special damages
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
SLAPP suit
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
public official
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/38
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 20: Defamation
1
On a Google forum, Oliver calls Jim a wife-beater.________

A) Google and Oliver have defamed Jim.
B) Google but not Oliver has defamed Jim.
C) Oliver but not Google has defamed Jim.
D) The statement is a protected opinion.
C
2
Providers of interactive computer services on the Internet have an immunity from tort liability based on defamatory statements made by others on the online service of the providers.
True
3
Extrinsic facts may need to be pleaded in the colloquium of the complaint to establish that the defamatory statement was of and concerning the plaintiff.
True
4
Alice is the mayor of the city. The local newspaper publishes a story that falsely accuses Alice of unethical behavior.________.

A) The newspaper must prove that it was unaware of the falsity of the story.
B) Alice can win only if she proves that the newspaper published the story with actual malice.
C) The newspaper must prove that it was no more than negligent in printing the story.
D) Alice can win if she proves that the newspaper published the story negligently.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
Defamation consists of two separate torts: libel and slander.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Defamatory opinions can never be actionable.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
Match between columns
oral defamation that is not slander per se
privilege
oral defamation that is not slander per se
fact
oral defamation that is not slander per se
fair comment
oral defamation that is not slander per se
extrinsic fact
oral defamation that is not slander per se
public figure
oral defamation that is not slander per se
libel
oral defamation that is not slander per se
actual malice
oral defamation that is not slander per se
publication
oral defamation that is not slander per se
opinion
oral defamation that is not slander per se
inducement
oral defamation that is not slander per se
slander per se
oral defamation that is not slander per se
special damages
oral defamation that is not slander per se
SLAPP suit
oral defamation that is not slander per se
public official
oral defamation that is not slander per se
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Extrinsic facts are needed only for statements that are defamatory on their face.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
Match between columns
government employee
privilege
government employee
fact
government employee
fair comment
government employee
extrinsic fact
government employee
public figure
government employee
libel
government employee
actual malice
government employee
publication
government employee
opinion
government employee
inducement
government employee
slander per se
government employee
special damages
government employee
SLAPP suit
government employee
public official
government employee
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Match between columns
retaliatory action
privilege
retaliatory action
fact
retaliatory action
fair comment
retaliatory action
extrinsic fact
retaliatory action
public figure
retaliatory action
libel
retaliatory action
actual malice
retaliatory action
publication
retaliatory action
opinion
retaliatory action
inducement
retaliatory action
slander per se
retaliatory action
special damages
retaliatory action
SLAPP suit
retaliatory action
public official
retaliatory action
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
A qualified privilege can be lost if it is not exercised in a reasonable manner for a proper purpose.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
Actual malice must always be proven by any plaintiff who sues the media for defamation.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Match between columns
actual economic losses
privilege
actual economic losses
fact
actual economic losses
fair comment
actual economic losses
extrinsic fact
actual economic losses
public figure
actual economic losses
libel
actual economic losses
actual malice
actual economic losses
publication
actual economic losses
opinion
actual economic losses
inducement
actual economic losses
slander per se
actual economic losses
special damages
actual economic losses
SLAPP suit
actual economic losses
public official
actual economic losses
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Charles, a weight lifter, sues Greg for slander when Greg tells Charles that he "obviously takes illegal steroids."________

A) There was no slander because the statement was an opinion.
B) There was no slander because Charles was a public figure.
C) There was no slander because extrinsic facts are needed to understand the defamatory meaning.
D) There was no slander because the statement was not published.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Match between columns
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
privilege
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
fact
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
fair comment
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
extrinsic fact
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
public figure
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
libel
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
actual malice
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
publication
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
opinion
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
inducement
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
slander per se
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
special damages
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
SLAPP suit
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
public official
oral statement that accuses one of a crime
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
A fact is a statement that can be objectively established as true or false.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
Match between columns
a portion of the defamation complaint
privilege
a portion of the defamation complaint
fact
a portion of the defamation complaint
fair comment
a portion of the defamation complaint
extrinsic fact
a portion of the defamation complaint
public figure
a portion of the defamation complaint
libel
a portion of the defamation complaint
actual malice
a portion of the defamation complaint
publication
a portion of the defamation complaint
opinion
a portion of the defamation complaint
inducement
a portion of the defamation complaint
slander per se
a portion of the defamation complaint
special damages
a portion of the defamation complaint
SLAPP suit
a portion of the defamation complaint
public official
a portion of the defamation complaint
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
What is fair comment, and when does it prevent liability for defamation?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
What is a public figure? What two kinds exist?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
Who has an absolute privilege to defame?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
What is a private person?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
Match between columns
not objectively verifiable
privilege
not objectively verifiable
fact
not objectively verifiable
fair comment
not objectively verifiable
extrinsic fact
not objectively verifiable
public figure
not objectively verifiable
libel
not objectively verifiable
actual malice
not objectively verifiable
publication
not objectively verifiable
opinion
not objectively verifiable
inducement
not objectively verifiable
slander per se
not objectively verifiable
special damages
not objectively verifiable
SLAPP suit
not objectively verifiable
public official
not objectively verifiable
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
When do those who merely deliver or transmit the defamatory statement, such as bookstores, become liable?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
Match between columns
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
privilege
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
fact
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
fair comment
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
extrinsic fact
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
public figure
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
libel
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
actual malice
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
publication
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
opinion
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
inducement
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
slander per se
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
special damages
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
SLAPP suit
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
public official
communicated to someone other than the plaintiff
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
Match between columns
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
privilege
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
fact
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
fair comment
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
extrinsic fact
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
public figure
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
libel
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
actual malice
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
publication
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
opinion
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
inducement
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
slander per se
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
special damages
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
SLAPP suit
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
public official
knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of accuracy
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
In a suit against the media by a public official or public figure, what must be proven if the defamatory statement pertained to a matter of public concern?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
A defendant can make a false statement innocently or by fault. List three possible standards of fault.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
Publication is an element of libel or slander. When does publication occur?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
In a suit against the media by a public official or public figure, what must be proven if the defamatory statement pertained to a matter of private concern?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
Match between columns
written defamation
privilege
written defamation
fact
written defamation
fair comment
written defamation
extrinsic fact
written defamation
public figure
written defamation
libel
written defamation
actual malice
written defamation
publication
written defamation
opinion
written defamation
inducement
written defamation
slander per se
written defamation
special damages
written defamation
SLAPP suit
written defamation
public official
written defamation
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
Match between columns
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
privilege
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
fact
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
fair comment
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
extrinsic fact
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
public figure
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
libel
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
actual malice
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
publication
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
opinion
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
inducement
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
slander per se
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
special damages
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
SLAPP suit
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
public official
someone (other than a public official) who has special prominence
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
When is a statement of fact defamatory?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
What is a SLAPP suit?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
Match between columns
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
privilege
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
fact
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
fair comment
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
extrinsic fact
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
public figure
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
libel
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
actual malice
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
publication
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
opinion
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
inducement
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
slander per se
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
special damages
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
SLAPP suit
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
public official
needed because the statement is not defamatory on its face
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
What is a public official?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
Match between columns
privilege protecting opinion
privilege
privilege protecting opinion
fact
privilege protecting opinion
fair comment
privilege protecting opinion
extrinsic fact
privilege protecting opinion
public figure
privilege protecting opinion
libel
privilege protecting opinion
actual malice
privilege protecting opinion
publication
privilege protecting opinion
opinion
privilege protecting opinion
inducement
privilege protecting opinion
slander per se
privilege protecting opinion
special damages
privilege protecting opinion
SLAPP suit
privilege protecting opinion
public official
privilege protecting opinion
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
Match between columns
objectively verifiable
privilege
objectively verifiable
fact
objectively verifiable
fair comment
objectively verifiable
extrinsic fact
objectively verifiable
public figure
objectively verifiable
libel
objectively verifiable
actual malice
objectively verifiable
publication
objectively verifiable
opinion
objectively verifiable
inducement
objectively verifiable
slander per se
objectively verifiable
special damages
objectively verifiable
SLAPP suit
objectively verifiable
public official
objectively verifiable
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
Match between columns
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
privilege
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
fact
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
fair comment
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
extrinsic fact
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
public figure
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
libel
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
actual malice
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
publication
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
opinion
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
inducement
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
slander per se
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
special damages
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
SLAPP suit
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
public official
the right to act contrary to another's right without liability
slander per quod
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 38 flashcards in this deck.