Deck 3: Old English: the Viking Invasions and Their Consequences 700-10661100

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
How did the Christianization of the Vikings contribute to the stability of England after King Alfred's victory over the forces under Guthrum at Edington?
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
How do the two poems quoted in the excerpts ("Brunanburh" and "Maldon") reflect "national" self-awareness among the Saxons?
Question
The written literature we have from the OE period may not give a balanced view of the language. Ex-plain why this is the case.
Question
What speaks for and what against seeing the weakening of inflections as the result of ON-OE contact?
Question
Quite a number of ON-OE lexical doublets exist that may be credited to borrowings from ON that go back to the same roots as the corresponding OE words. Where they continue to exist there is a semantic differentiation between the two. Explain how the following pairs differ:
Question
How are the effects of ON on the language evident in ModE? Give examples from the areas of inflection, syntax, and regional dialect vocabulary.
Question
Just how present were the Vikings in England. Look at estimates of the numerical relations and of blood-type representation as well as of DNA-evidence. Some literature (see the general bibliography) which you might start with include the following: Sykes 2006, 2007 and Thomas, Stumpf, and Härke 2006.
Question
Look at further OE-ON doublets and see how they are differentiated from one another semantically. Examples of such ModE doublets are till-to; die-starve; skin-hide; take-nim; sky-heaven; ill-evil; scathe-harm; raise-rear.
Question
In this chapter we have assumed in Table 3.2 that ON was the superstrate and OE, the substrate in the Danelaw area. However, an earlier comment in §3.3 suggests something different: "ON may initially have been the superstrate, but later, even in Danelaw times, the substrate." Assuming a situation of creolization between ON and OE which language would be the superstrate and which the substrate language? Justify your conclusion.
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/9
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 3: Old English: the Viking Invasions and Their Consequences 700-10661100
1
How did the Christianization of the Vikings contribute to the stability of England after King Alfred's victory over the forces under Guthrum at Edington?
Christianization was an important step in the process of assimilation of the Danes to Anglo-Saxon culture. This is understandably the case in societies in which religion plays a central unifying role and contributes to
accommodation­ and the development of a cultural identity. Furthermore, the relationship between the Church and the Wessex monarchy was very close, each supporting the other.
2
How do the two poems quoted in the excerpts ("Brunanburh" and "Maldon") reflect "national" self-awareness among the Saxons?
"Brunanburh" celebrated the Saxon victory over the Vikings and Scots, invoking their Saxon ancestors and homeland and apostrophizing the Scots and Vikings as enemies, fated to fall.
"Maldon" also invoked the homeland against the heathens and mentions the shame that the taking of booty from the Saxons without the Saxons offering resistance would mean.
Furthermore, coming after the Norman Conquest, this poem has a patriotic appeal to a Saxon identity.
3
The written literature we have from the OE period may not give a balanced view of the language. Ex-plain why this is the case.
See the answer given to Social-cultural background 2.5, repeated here:
Because of the limited number of registers available we have no real examples of everyday language. Much of what was written may have been outdated, if not directly archaic at the time of composition.
4
What speaks for and what against seeing the weakening of inflections as the result of ON-OE contact?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 9 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
Quite a number of ON-OE lexical doublets exist that may be credited to borrowings from ON that go back to the same roots as the corresponding OE words. Where they continue to exist there is a semantic differentiation between the two. Explain how the following pairs differ:
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 9 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
How are the effects of ON on the language evident in ModE? Give examples from the areas of inflection, syntax, and regional dialect vocabulary.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 9 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
Just how present were the Vikings in England. Look at estimates of the numerical relations and of blood-type representation as well as of DNA-evidence. Some literature (see the general bibliography) which you might start with include the following: Sykes 2006, 2007 and Thomas, Stumpf, and Härke 2006.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 9 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Look at further OE-ON doublets and see how they are differentiated from one another semantically. Examples of such ModE doublets are till-to; die-starve; skin-hide; take-nim; sky-heaven; ill-evil; scathe-harm; raise-rear.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 9 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
In this chapter we have assumed in Table 3.2 that ON was the superstrate and OE, the substrate in the Danelaw area. However, an earlier comment in §3.3 suggests something different: "ON may initially have been the superstrate, but later, even in Danelaw times, the substrate." Assuming a situation of creolization between ON and OE which language would be the superstrate and which the substrate language? Justify your conclusion.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 9 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 9 flashcards in this deck.