Deck 4: Search and Seizure and the Doctrine of Justification
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/58
Play
Full screen (f)
Deck 4: Search and Seizure and the Doctrine of Justification
1
The passage of the _____________ in 1215 signaled the beginning of an evolutionary process, the product of which was the due process of law.
A) Sacra Romana Rota
B) Magna Carta
C) Doctrine of Stare Decisis
D) Code of Hammurabi
A) Sacra Romana Rota
B) Magna Carta
C) Doctrine of Stare Decisis
D) Code of Hammurabi
Magna Carta
2
For American citizens, the protection from unlawful detainment, inquiry, and search resides firmly within the:
A) Second Amendment
B) Third Amendment
C) Fourth Amendment
D) Sixth Amendment
A) Second Amendment
B) Third Amendment
C) Fourth Amendment
D) Sixth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
3
What is considered to be the lowest of all legal standards of evidence?
A) Probable cause
B) Reasonable suspicion
C) Reasonable doubt
D) None of the above
A) Probable cause
B) Reasonable suspicion
C) Reasonable doubt
D) None of the above
Reasonable suspicion
4
What is the highest legal standard which demonstrates a finding of guilt or proof by tiers of fact in a criminal proceeding?
A) Probable cause
B) Reasonable suspicion
C) Beyond a reasonable doubt
D) None of the above
A) Probable cause
B) Reasonable suspicion
C) Beyond a reasonable doubt
D) None of the above
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
What court case is illustrative of the strict interpretation of the 4th Amendment?
A) Olmstead v. U.S.
B) Brinegar v U.S.
C) Draper v. U.S.
D) Illinois v. Gates
A) Olmstead v. U.S.
B) Brinegar v U.S.
C) Draper v. U.S.
D) Illinois v. Gates
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Public employees are bound by rulings articulated in Ortega that specifically evaluates:
A) Whether the employee's expectation of privacy was consistent with the operational realities of the workplace (i.e. the exclusivity of the workspace, accessibility to workplace by others, nature of employee's duties, knowledge of search procedures or practices, and reason for search.
B) Whether the invasion of the employee's Fourth Amendment protections was reasonable when balanced against governmental interest in the intrusion (reasonable suspicion is sufficient in the investigations involving work-related employee misconduct.
C) Whether the search was reasonable at inception and was the subsequent scope of the search related to the original justification of the search.
D) All of the above.
A) Whether the employee's expectation of privacy was consistent with the operational realities of the workplace (i.e. the exclusivity of the workspace, accessibility to workplace by others, nature of employee's duties, knowledge of search procedures or practices, and reason for search.
B) Whether the invasion of the employee's Fourth Amendment protections was reasonable when balanced against governmental interest in the intrusion (reasonable suspicion is sufficient in the investigations involving work-related employee misconduct.
C) Whether the search was reasonable at inception and was the subsequent scope of the search related to the original justification of the search.
D) All of the above.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
Which Amendment imposing limitation upon governmental abridgment of freedom to associate and privacy in one's association?
A) First Amendment
B) Second Amendment
C) Third Amendment
D) Fourth Amendment
A) First Amendment
B) Second Amendment
C) Third Amendment
D) Fourth Amendment
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Which Amendment prohibits the nonconsensual peacetime quartering of soldiers?
A) First Amendment
B) Third Amendment
C) Eighth Amendment
D) Fourteenth Amendment
A) First Amendment
B) Third Amendment
C) Eighth Amendment
D) Fourteenth Amendment
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
This is a legal directive issued by a magistrate or judge giving law enforcement officers to conduct arrests, seizures, or searches of persons or specified items at a particular time and location.
A) Writ of centori
B) Warrant
C) Writ of habeas corpus
D) Mens rea
A) Writ of centori
B) Warrant
C) Writ of habeas corpus
D) Mens rea
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Search warrants can only be issued by a _____________ upon showing of probable cause.
A) Prosecutor
B) Public Defender
C) Judge or magistrate
D) Only a judge
A) Prosecutor
B) Public Defender
C) Judge or magistrate
D) Only a judge
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
The Supreme Court has consistently evaluated standards of probable cause. The initial standard was the:
A) Aguilar-Spinelli test
B) Standards of Probable Cause
C) Totality of the Circumstances Test
D) None of the above
A) Aguilar-Spinelli test
B) Standards of Probable Cause
C) Totality of the Circumstances Test
D) None of the above
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
Which of the following court case set forth the standard of Totality of the Circumstances Test?
A) Olmstead v. U.S.
B) Brinegar v. U.S.
C) Draper v. U.S.
D) Illinois v. Gates
A) Olmstead v. U.S.
B) Brinegar v. U.S.
C) Draper v. U.S.
D) Illinois v. Gates
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Probable cause is established through the evaluation of how many sets of facts?
A) Two
B) Three
C) Four
D) Five
A) Two
B) Three
C) Four
D) Five
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Which Court case noted that "the particularity requirement's purpose is not limited to preventing general searches; it also assures the individual whose property is searched and seized of the executing officer's legal authority, his need to search, and the limits of his power to do so"?
A) Olmstead v. U.S.
B) Groh v. Ramirez
C) Draper v. U.S.
D) Illinois v. Gates
A) Olmstead v. U.S.
B) Groh v. Ramirez
C) Draper v. U.S.
D) Illinois v. Gates
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Which type of search warrant is extremely unique in that they are issued prior to the arrival of the evidence in a particular location?
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
Which type of search warrant is issued in a variety of situations in which law enforcement officers gain surreptitious entry into premises or areas where a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, including, but not limited to, residences, offices, and the like.
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
Which type of search warrant may be issued if demonstration is made of the potentiality of circumvention of justice or threat to human life exists?
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
Which Court case noted that "A search warrant could be served at any time of the day or night so long as the issuing officer was "satisfied that there is probable cause to believe that the grounds for the application exist…?"
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
A) Sneak and peak
B) No knock
C) Anticipatory
D) Nighttime
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
The passage of the Magna Carta in 1215 signaled the beginning of an evolutionary process, the product of which was the due process of law.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
For American citizens, the protection from unlawful detainment, inquiry, and searches resides firmly within the First Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
Probable cause may be defined as that standard or amount of evidence necessary to affect the arrest of an individual or that induces the belief in the minds of a reasonable officer that the accused probably committed a crime.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
Reasonable suspicion is the highest of all legal standards of evidence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
Probable cause is situated between reasonable suspicion and beyond a reasonable doubt.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
The Supreme Court has declared the practice of field interrogation as unconstitutional.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
The term beyond reasonable doubt refers to the legal standard by which a determination of guilt is established by the trier or fact.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
The expectation of our right to privacy is a value embraced by Americans from young to old.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
The case of Carroll v. United States is illustrative of the strict interpretation of the 4th Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
Not all federal, state, and domestic wiretaps require a court order predicated on probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
An unalienable right to privacy is not specifically articulated in the Constitution, and case law reveals that the Court has not generalized a constitutional right to privacy, noting that other provisions of the Constitution protect privacy from other forms of governmental invasion.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
All warrants are required to identify with specificity and particularity the place to be searched, the items to be seized, and the criminal behavior in question.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
According to vicinage, warrants may be issued only by judicial officials who bear authority over the location in question.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
Anticipatory search warrants are issued in a variety of situations in which law enforcement officers gain surreptitious entry into premises or areas where a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, including, but not limited to, residences, offices, and the like.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
Police may obtain a no-knock warrant if demonstration is made of the potentiality of circumvention of justice or threat to human life exists.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
The passage of the Magna __________ in 1215 signaled the beginning of an evolutionary process, the product of which was the due process of law.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
Probable cause may be defined as that standard or amount of evidence necessary to affect the arrest of an individual or that induces the belief in the minds of a _________ officer that the accused probably committed a crime.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
Reasonable ____________ is the lowest of all legal standards of evidence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
Beyond a reasonable doubt is a legal standard by which a determination of guilt is established by the trier of ____________.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
The case of Olmstead v. U.S.in 1928 is illustrative of the strict interpretation of the ___________ Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
39
The expectation of the right to ______________ is a value embraced by Americans from young to old.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
40
The 4th ______________ specifically provides that no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and persons or things to be seized.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
41
______________ search warrants are extremely unique in that they are issued prior to the arrival of the evidence in a particular location.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
42
____________ search warrants are the exception rather than the rule.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
43
Field interrogations, incident to arrest, consent, plain view, automobiles, and exigent circumstances use __________ searches.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
44
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-Katz v. United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-Katz v. United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
45
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-In re Winship
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-In re Winship
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
46
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-Terry v. Ohio
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-Terry v. Ohio
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
47
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-New Jersey v. T.L.O
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-New Jersey v. T.L.O
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
48
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-Illinois v. Gates
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-Illinois v. Gates
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
49
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-Brinegar v. United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-Brinegar v. United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
50
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-O'Connor v. Ortega
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-O'Connor v. Ortega
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
51
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-Hoffa v. United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-Hoffa v. United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
52
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-Olmstead v United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-Olmstead v United States
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
53
Match up the terminology to the definitions :
-Groh v. Ramirez
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
-Groh v. Ramirez
A) In dealing with probable cause, you deal with probabilities and they are technical, factual, and practical.
B) Court upheld the search of a student's purse by a high school principle.
C) Although later overturned, in this case it was originally ruled there was a difference between searches that involved a physical trespass of a private residence and those that did not.
D) Standardized the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) Searches conducted outside the judicial process are unreasonable except under specifically established exceptions.
F) Established reasonable suspicion a standard that is less than probable cause but one sufficient to authorize an investigative detention.
G) Set forth the more flexible standard of the totality of the circumstance.
H) Evaluates employee's expectation of privacy in the workplace balancing between operational realities and governmental interest.
I) Warrants are particular and limited so unrelated items remain immune from search and seizure.
J) Upheld the use of confidential informants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
54
Discuss the intricacies of search and seizures.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
55
Define probable cause and reasonable suspicion and under which circumstances are each used.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
56
Define warrant and explain what is needed to obtain a warrant, and discuss the different types of warrants.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
57
Discuss the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Riley v. California and how it relates to the topic of privacy discussed in this chapter.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
58
Choose between New Jersey v. T.L.O or the Veronia School District v. Action case and write a summary of the case and conclude with you opinion of whether you agree with the ruling.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 58 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck