Deck 14: Writing the Research Report

Question 1

What is the general process by which social researchers go about locating, applying for, and using outside funds to construct a study?

Answer 1

The general process by which social researchers locate, apply for, and use outside funds to construct a study typically involves several key steps:

1. **Identifying Funding Sources**: Researchers begin by identifying potential sources of funding. This can include government agencies, private foundations, non-profit organizations, academic institutions, and industry partners. Researchers often use databases, funding alerts, newsletters, and professional networks to find relevant grant opportunities.

2. **Understanding Funding Priorities**: Once potential funders are identified, researchers must understand the priorities, guidelines, and requirements of each funding source. This involves reading the funding announcements or calls for proposals carefully to ensure that their research interests align with the funder's objectives.

3. **Developing a Research Proposal**: The next step is to develop a detailed research proposal. This document typically includes an introduction to the research question or problem, a literature review, a description of the proposed methodology, expected outcomes, a timeline, and a budget. The proposal must make a strong case for the significance of the research and its potential impact.

4. **Budget Planning**: Creating a budget is a critical component of the proposal. Researchers must estimate the costs associated with their study, including personnel, equipment, travel, data collection, and analysis. They must ensure that the budget aligns with the funder's guidelines and restrictions.

5. **Internal Review and Approval**: Before submission, researchers often need to obtain approval from their home institution. This may involve an internal review process to ensure compliance with institutional policies and ethical standards, particularly if the research involves human subjects.

6. **Proposal Submission**: After finalizing the proposal and obtaining necessary approvals, researchers submit their proposal to the funding agency by the specified deadline. This is often done through an online submission portal.

7. **Peer Review and Decision**: Most funding agencies use a peer review process to evaluate proposals. Proposals are reviewed by experts in the field who assess the quality, feasibility, and potential impact of the proposed research. Based on these reviews, the funding agency makes decisions on which proposals to fund.

8. **Award and Negotiation**: If a proposal is selected for funding, the researcher receives an award letter. There may be a negotiation phase where details of the funding agreement, such as budget adjustments or project scope, are finalized.

9. **Project Implementation**: With funding secured, researchers can begin their study. This involves managing the project according to the approved proposal, timeline, and budget. Researchers must adhere to any reporting requirements set by the funder, providing updates on progress and expenditures.

10. **Dissemination of Results**: After the research is completed, researchers are often required to disseminate their findings. This can be through publications, conference presentations, public lectures, or reports to the funding agency. Dissemination ensures that the research reaches a wider audience and contributes to the body of knowledge in the field.

11. **Compliance and Audit**: Throughout the funding period and sometimes after the project ends, researchers may be subject to compliance checks and audits. This is to ensure that the funds were used appropriately and in accordance with the terms of the grant.

12. **Post-Project Reporting**: Finally, researchers typically must submit a final report to the funder detailing the outcomes of the research, how funds were spent, and the impact of the study.

Throughout this process, researchers must maintain high ethical standards, transparency, and accountability, both to their subjects and to their funders. Successful funding acquisition is often a competitive and challenging process, requiring a combination of strong research ideas, clear communication, and strategic alignment with funding priorities.

Question 2

Borrowing someone else's ideas or words, but failing to properly document the original source is called

A) paraphrasing.
B) writer's block.
C) plagiarism.
D) editing.
E) rewriting.

Answer 2

plagiarism.

Question 3

Ebony was delayed in finishing her research report. She blamed it on writer's block. What was she complaining about?

A) A reference tool that helps researchers writing a report learn alternative words for the same idea.
B) An Internet source that provides writers with new source materials.
C) A "support group" formed by writers with others who are writing on similar topics to discuss ideas and process.
D) The temporary inability of a writer to continue with the writing process, i.e., to generate ideas and put ideas into words.
E) A physical object that writers place on a writing table or surface that helps with organizing notes.

Answer 3

The temporary inability of a writer to continue with the writing process, i.e., to generate ideas and put ideas into words.

Question 4

In the methods section of a report on quantitative research, you would NOT expect to learn about

A) the type of study or data collection technique (e.g., experiment, survey).
B) exactly how data were gathered.
C) how variables were measured.
D) main finding or conclusion of the study.
E) characteristics of the sample (e.g., method of sampling, sample size).

Question 5

Talk about:
-editing

Question 6

Talk about:
-error of segregation

Question 7

Talk about:
-executive summary

Question 8

Talk about:
-grantsmanship

Question 9

Talk about:
-paraphrasing

Question 10

Talk about:
-plagiarism

Question 11

Talk about:
-prewriting

Question 12

Talk about:
-principal investigator (PI)

Question 13

Talk about:
-revising

Question 14

Talk about:
-rewriting

Question 15

Talk about:
-zoom lens