Deck 7: Policing: Legal Aspects
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/36
Play
Full screen (f)
Deck 7: Policing: Legal Aspects
1
An exception to the exclusionary rule.Law enforcement officers who conduct a search or who seize evidence on the basis of good faith (that is,when they believe they are operating according to the dictates of the law)and who later discover that a mistake was made (perhaps in the format of the application for a search warrant)may still provide evidence that can be used in court.
True
2
A warrantless search of an arrested individual conducted to ensure the safety of the arresting officer is permitted:
A) After Miranda warnings are given
B) As part of the exclusionary rule
C) because of the good faith exception
D) Incident to an arrest.
A) After Miranda warnings are given
B) As part of the exclusionary rule
C) because of the good faith exception
D) Incident to an arrest.
D.
3
Which famous 1966 U.S.Supreme Court case required that criminal suspects be read their rights prior to being questioned by the police while in custody?
A) Tennessee v. Garner
B) Miranda v. Arizona
C) Chimel v. California
D) Nix v. Williams
A) Tennessee v. Garner
B) Miranda v. Arizona
C) Chimel v. California
D) Nix v. Williams
B
4
Silverthorne Lumber v.U.S.is responsible for describing what principle of Fourth Amendment processes?
A) fruit of the poisoned tree doctrine
B) good-faith exception
C) exclusionary rule
D) public safety exception
A) fruit of the poisoned tree doctrine
B) good-faith exception
C) exclusionary rule
D) public safety exception
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
Unreasonable searches and seizures are prohibited by the:
A) Fifth Amendment.
B) Protection clause.
C) Fourth Amendment.
D) Equality statute.
A) Fifth Amendment.
B) Protection clause.
C) Fourth Amendment.
D) Equality statute.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
The U.S.Supreme Court decided in Illinois v.Perkins that:
A) defendants have the right to an attorney at a lineup.
B) the exclusionary rule does not apply to interrogation cases.
C) inmates freely talking about their crimes to an undercover officer posing as an inmate are not protected by Miranda.
D) the police must obtain a warrant to secure a wiretap.
A) defendants have the right to an attorney at a lineup.
B) the exclusionary rule does not apply to interrogation cases.
C) inmates freely talking about their crimes to an undercover officer posing as an inmate are not protected by Miranda.
D) the police must obtain a warrant to secure a wiretap.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
Which U.S.Supreme Court cast established the plain view doctrine.
A) U.S. v. Weeks
B) Escobedo v. Illinois
C) Mapp v. Ohio
D) Harris v. U.S.
A) U.S. v. Weeks
B) Escobedo v. Illinois
C) Mapp v. Ohio
D) Harris v. U.S.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
The ____________ holds that evidence illegally seized by the police cannot be used in a trial.
A) Exclusionary rule
B) Fifth Amendment
C) Miranda v. Arizona
D) Sixth Amendment
A) Exclusionary rule
B) Fifth Amendment
C) Miranda v. Arizona
D) Sixth Amendment
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
Which 1960s U.S.Supreme Court dramatically changed the day-to-day practice of American policing?
a. Warren Court
b. Eisenhower Court
b. Rehnquist Court
c. Burger Court
Answer. A
a. Warren Court
b. Eisenhower Court
b. Rehnquist Court
c. Burger Court
Answer. A
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Concerning informants,which of the following was established in Aguilar v.Texas?
A) The informant's name must be known.
B) There is reasonable belief that the informant is reliable.
C) The informant must not have a prior record.
D) The information is known by at least two detectives
A) The informant's name must be known.
B) There is reasonable belief that the informant is reliable.
C) The informant must not have a prior record.
D) The information is known by at least two detectives
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
_______________ exists when a set of facts and circumstances that would induce a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that a particular other person has committed a specific crime.
A) Exclusionary rule
B) Fruits of the poisonous tree
C) Probable Cause
D) Inherent coercion
A) Exclusionary rule
B) Fruits of the poisonous tree
C) Probable Cause
D) Inherent coercion
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 made it more difficult for police investigators to intercept many forms of electronic communications.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Unreasonable searches and seizures are prohibited by the:
A) Fifth Amendment.
B) protection clause.
C) Fourth Amendment.
D) equality statute.
A) Fifth Amendment.
B) protection clause.
C) Fourth Amendment.
D) equality statute.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
The plain-view doctrine still applies if officers move objects so they can see evidence otherwise hidden from view.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
The court recognized a suspect's right to have legal counsel present during interrogation in Escobedo v.Illinois.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
Which Supreme Court ruling applied the principles,regarding the exclusionary rule,developed in Weeks v.U.S.to trials in state courts?
A) Illinois v. Gates
B) Horton v. California
C) U.S. v. Leon
D) Mapp v. Ohio
A) Illinois v. Gates
B) Horton v. California
C) U.S. v. Leon
D) Mapp v. Ohio
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
The Bill of Rights is the popular name given to the first ________ amendments to the U.S.Constitution.
A) 10
B) 15
C) 30
D) 20
A) 10
B) 15
C) 30
D) 20
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
This Supreme Court case has become the basis for a brief "stop and frisk" based on a reasonable suspicion.
A) Miranda v. Arizona
B) Terry v. Ohio
C) Argersinger v. Hamlin
D) Brady v. U.S.
A) Miranda v. Arizona
B) Terry v. Ohio
C) Argersinger v. Hamlin
D) Brady v. U.S.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
Latent evidence is evidence of relevance to a criminal investigation that is not readily seen by the unaided eye
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
The information gathering activity of police officers that involves direct question of suspects is known as:
A) search and seizure
B) Interrogation
C) fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine
D) reasonable suspicion
A) search and seizure
B) Interrogation
C) fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine
D) reasonable suspicion
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
What is an arrest and when does it occur?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
_______________ is a search that occurs in the suspect's absence and without his or her prior knowledge.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
Discuss the three points that must be made to show that a defendant waived his or her rights to answer questions.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
Match the term in the numbered column with the answer in the lettered column.Match the era to its matching definition..
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right to a speedy trial
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right to a speedy trial
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
Match the term in the numbered column with the answer in the lettered column.Match the era to its matching definition..
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right against "double jeopardy"
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right against "double jeopardy"
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
Match the term in the numbered column with the answer in the lettered column.Match the era to its matching definition..
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right against unreasonable searches and seizures
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right against unreasonable searches and seizures
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
The author lists three major areas of police abuse that may occur during interrogation.List and define those three areas of potential abuse.Discuss your feelings about these abuses citing relevant examples to agree or disagree with them.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
Compare and contrast the issues relative to electronic gathering evidence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
Chimel v.California involved searches of person's _________________.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
A _______________ case is a precedent-setting court decision that produces substantial changes in both the understanding of the requirements of due process and the practical day-to-day operations of the justice system.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
Motor vehicles present a special law enforcement problem.Discuss some of those problems and cite U.S.Supreme court cases that deal specifically with motor vehicles.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
Illegally seized evidence is seized without regard to the principles of ________ process.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
Discuss the pros and cons of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001and the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005,PART II.Specifically the address the freedoms Americans gained or lost because of these acts.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
Match the term in the numbered column with the answer in the lettered column.Match the era to its matching definition..
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right to reasonable bail
a.Sixth
b.Fourth
c.Eight
d.Fifth
The right to reasonable bail
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
The U.S.Supreme Court ruled that informant information can establish probable cause if two criteria are met.Define the two criteria and cite the U.S.Supreme Court case that developed the two pronged test.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
A(n)_________________ is issued from an appellate court for the purpose of obtaining from a lower court the record of its proceedings in a particular case.In some states,this writ is the mechanism for discretionary review.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 36 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck