Deck 4: Criminal Law

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil is called a(n):

A)Alibi.
B)Procedural defense.
C)Justification.
D)Insanity.
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
The state of mind that accompanies a criminal act is:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
Question
Before a person may be charged with a crime it must first be established that a crime has been committed.This violation is called:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)Inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
Question
The Latin term that indicates that a crime has been committed and literally means the body of the crime is:

A)Corpus delicti.
B)Stare decisis.
C)Ex post facto.
D)Criminalus Bodem.
Question
Which of the following is a justification defense?

A)Duress
B)Insanity
C)Double jeopardy
D)Self-defense
Question
Typically civil lawsuits seek:

A)To punish a wrongdoer.
B)Compensation.
C)To deter others from committing a similar offense.
D)To protect society.
Question
A criminal's reason for committing a crime is commonly known as:

A)Attendant circumstances.
B)Procedural.
C)Concurrence.
D)Motive.
Question
The U.S.Constitution prohibits the enactment of ________________ laws which makes acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.

A)Stare decisis
B)Corpus delicti
C)Ex post facto
D)Mens Rea
Question
What term expresses the belief that a society must be governed by established principles to maintain order?

A)Rule of law
B)Stare decisis
C)Codification
D)Inchoate
Question
Diminished Capacity is a:

A)Procedure.
B)Verdict.
C)Rule of law.
D)Defense.
Question
By definition the criminal act and the mental state occur together in order for a crime to take place.This is known as:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
Question
Which of the following types of law occurs when public order is compromised for wrongs against society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
Question
Which Constitutional Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial?

A)Fourth
B)Sixth
C)Fifth
D)Eighth
Question
Originally created in 1871 and the basis for gauging insanity defense,the _________ is still used today in our court system.

A)Durham Rule
B)Browner Rule
C)Procedural Rule
D)GBMI Rule
Question
Which of the following would not be categorized as a felony?

A)Robbery
B)Murder
C)Simple assault
D)Rape
Question
.Search and seizure,arrest procedures,and general rules of evidence are considered:

A)Substantive law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Administrative law.
D)Civil law.
Question
A Tort action occurs under:

A)Case law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Civil law.
D)Double jeopardy.
Question
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S.Constitution says that no person may be tried twice for the same offense.This is known as:

A)Ex post facto.
B)Entrapment.
C)Double jeopardy.
D)Stare decisis.
Question
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future decisions is known as:

A)Precedent.
B)Statutory law.
C)Procedure.
D)Case law.
Question
Which of the following types of law is based on the assumption that acts injure not just individuals,but society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
Question
A misdemeanor is a criminal offense punishable by death or by incarceration in a prison facility for at least one year.
Question
Penal code is the written or codified law;the "law on the books," as enacted by a government body or agency having the power to make laws.
Question
Case law is the body of judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws,that serves as a guide to decision making,especially in the courts.
Question
The Latin term for the facts that show that a crime has occurred,the term literally means "the body of the crime," is known as _______________ delecti.
Question
Judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws that serves as a guide to decision making especially in the courts is known as ___________ law.
Question
A legal defense based on claims of mental illness or mental incapacity is known as the___________ defense.
Question
____________ force is the degree of force that is appropriate in a given situation and is not excessive.
Question
The M'Naghten rule is a rule for determining insanity,which asks whether the defendant knew what he or she was doing or whether or not the defendant knew that what he or she was doing was wrong.
Question
An alibi is a statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed,or so engaged in other provable activities,that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible.
Question
Procedural law is the branch of modern law that governs relationships between parties.
Question
Denial of a speedy trial is an example of a procedural defense.
Question
Civil law is the part of the law that specifies the methods to be used in enforcing substantive law and is part of the criminal law system.
Question
Criminal ___________ occurs when a person fails to reasonably perceive the substantial and unjustifiable risks of dangerous consequences of his or her actions.
Question
A justification defense occurs when the defendant admits the crime,but claims it was necessary to do so to avoid a greater evil.
Question
Common law originates from usage and custom rather than from written statutes.The term refers to an unwritten body of judicial opinion,originally developed by English courts,that is based on non-statutory customs,traditions,and precedents that help guide judicial decision making.
Question
Statutory law is the written,organized,and compiled form of the criminal laws of a jurisdiction.
Question
Double Jeopardy allows a defendant to collect double damages in a civil suit.
Question
______________ is an improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement.
Question
Entrapment is a proper and legal inducement to allow someone to commit a crime by agents of law enforcement.
Question
Corpus delicti literally means "the body of the crime."
Question
List and define the five categories of criminal law violations.Give examples of each category of law.
Question
What is the purpose of law? Would a society exist without laws? Comment on and analyze the pros and cons of these issues giving examples to support your opinions.
Question
As defenses,justifications claim a kind of moral high ground.Justifications may be offered by people who find themselves forced to choose between "two evils." Generally speaking,conduct that a person believes is necessary to avoid harm to him or to another is justifiable if the harm he is trying to avoid is greater than the harm the law defining the offense seeks to avoid.Define and comment on three of the six categories that are applicable to this defense.Analyze their good and bad points.
Question
Compare and contrast the difference between felonies,misdemeanors,and infractions.
Question
A rule for gauging insanity that was originally created in 1871 by a New Hampshire court is known as the ____________________ Rule.
Question
The Constitution prohibits the enactment of laws,which make acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.Ex __________ facto is the Latin term closely associated with this prohibition.
Question
______________ capacity is a defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be used to exonerate the defendant of guilt.
Question
The M'Naghten rule,the Durham rule,and the Brawner rule all are connected with insanity defense in criminal court.Define each rule and emphasize the difference between the three.
Question
Prosecutorial Misconduct is an example of a _____________ defense.
Question
Procedural defenses make the claim that the defendant was in some manner discriminated against in the justice process or that some important aspect of official procedure was not properly followed.List and define four of these defenses while commenting on their good and bad points.
Question
By definition a criminal action requires actus reus,mens rea,and concurrence to occur.Define and gives examples of these three actions.
Question
Match between columns
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Defense
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Alibi
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Justification
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Excuse
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Law
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Prosecutorial misconduct
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Entrapment
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Double jeopardy
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Diminished capacity
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Precedent
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Defense
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Alibi
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Justification
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Excuse
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Law
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Prosecutorial misconduct
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Entrapment
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Double jeopardy
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Diminished capacity
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Precedent
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Defense
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Alibi
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Justification
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Excuse
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Law
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Prosecutorial misconduct
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Entrapment
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Double jeopardy
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Diminished capacity
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Precedent
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Defense
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Alibi
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Justification
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Excuse
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Law
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Prosecutorial misconduct
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Entrapment
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Double jeopardy
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Diminished capacity
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Precedent
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Defense
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Alibi
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Justification
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Excuse
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Law
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Prosecutorial misconduct
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Entrapment
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Double jeopardy
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Diminished capacity
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Precedent
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Defense
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Alibi
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Justification
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Excuse
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Law
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Prosecutorial misconduct
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Entrapment
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Double jeopardy
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Diminished capacity
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Precedent
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Defense
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Alibi
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Justification
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Excuse
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Law
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Prosecutorial misconduct
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Entrapment
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Double jeopardy
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Diminished capacity
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Precedent
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Defense
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Alibi
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Justification
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Excuse
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Law
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Entrapment
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Double jeopardy
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Diminished capacity
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Precedent
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/52
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 4: Criminal Law
1
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil is called a(n):

A)Alibi.
B)Procedural defense.
C)Justification.
D)Insanity.
C
2
The state of mind that accompanies a criminal act is:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
B
3
Before a person may be charged with a crime it must first be established that a crime has been committed.This violation is called:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)Inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
A
4
The Latin term that indicates that a crime has been committed and literally means the body of the crime is:

A)Corpus delicti.
B)Stare decisis.
C)Ex post facto.
D)Criminalus Bodem.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
Which of the following is a justification defense?

A)Duress
B)Insanity
C)Double jeopardy
D)Self-defense
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Typically civil lawsuits seek:

A)To punish a wrongdoer.
B)Compensation.
C)To deter others from committing a similar offense.
D)To protect society.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
A criminal's reason for committing a crime is commonly known as:

A)Attendant circumstances.
B)Procedural.
C)Concurrence.
D)Motive.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
The U.S.Constitution prohibits the enactment of ________________ laws which makes acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.

A)Stare decisis
B)Corpus delicti
C)Ex post facto
D)Mens Rea
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
What term expresses the belief that a society must be governed by established principles to maintain order?

A)Rule of law
B)Stare decisis
C)Codification
D)Inchoate
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Diminished Capacity is a:

A)Procedure.
B)Verdict.
C)Rule of law.
D)Defense.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
By definition the criminal act and the mental state occur together in order for a crime to take place.This is known as:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
Which of the following types of law occurs when public order is compromised for wrongs against society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Which Constitutional Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial?

A)Fourth
B)Sixth
C)Fifth
D)Eighth
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Originally created in 1871 and the basis for gauging insanity defense,the _________ is still used today in our court system.

A)Durham Rule
B)Browner Rule
C)Procedural Rule
D)GBMI Rule
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Which of the following would not be categorized as a felony?

A)Robbery
B)Murder
C)Simple assault
D)Rape
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
.Search and seizure,arrest procedures,and general rules of evidence are considered:

A)Substantive law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Administrative law.
D)Civil law.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
A Tort action occurs under:

A)Case law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Civil law.
D)Double jeopardy.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S.Constitution says that no person may be tried twice for the same offense.This is known as:

A)Ex post facto.
B)Entrapment.
C)Double jeopardy.
D)Stare decisis.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future decisions is known as:

A)Precedent.
B)Statutory law.
C)Procedure.
D)Case law.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
Which of the following types of law is based on the assumption that acts injure not just individuals,but society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
A misdemeanor is a criminal offense punishable by death or by incarceration in a prison facility for at least one year.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
Penal code is the written or codified law;the "law on the books," as enacted by a government body or agency having the power to make laws.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
Case law is the body of judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws,that serves as a guide to decision making,especially in the courts.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
The Latin term for the facts that show that a crime has occurred,the term literally means "the body of the crime," is known as _______________ delecti.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
Judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws that serves as a guide to decision making especially in the courts is known as ___________ law.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
A legal defense based on claims of mental illness or mental incapacity is known as the___________ defense.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
____________ force is the degree of force that is appropriate in a given situation and is not excessive.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
The M'Naghten rule is a rule for determining insanity,which asks whether the defendant knew what he or she was doing or whether or not the defendant knew that what he or she was doing was wrong.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
An alibi is a statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed,or so engaged in other provable activities,that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
Procedural law is the branch of modern law that governs relationships between parties.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
Denial of a speedy trial is an example of a procedural defense.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
Civil law is the part of the law that specifies the methods to be used in enforcing substantive law and is part of the criminal law system.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
Criminal ___________ occurs when a person fails to reasonably perceive the substantial and unjustifiable risks of dangerous consequences of his or her actions.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
A justification defense occurs when the defendant admits the crime,but claims it was necessary to do so to avoid a greater evil.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
Common law originates from usage and custom rather than from written statutes.The term refers to an unwritten body of judicial opinion,originally developed by English courts,that is based on non-statutory customs,traditions,and precedents that help guide judicial decision making.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
Statutory law is the written,organized,and compiled form of the criminal laws of a jurisdiction.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
Double Jeopardy allows a defendant to collect double damages in a civil suit.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
______________ is an improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
39
Entrapment is a proper and legal inducement to allow someone to commit a crime by agents of law enforcement.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
40
Corpus delicti literally means "the body of the crime."
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
41
List and define the five categories of criminal law violations.Give examples of each category of law.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
42
What is the purpose of law? Would a society exist without laws? Comment on and analyze the pros and cons of these issues giving examples to support your opinions.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
43
As defenses,justifications claim a kind of moral high ground.Justifications may be offered by people who find themselves forced to choose between "two evils." Generally speaking,conduct that a person believes is necessary to avoid harm to him or to another is justifiable if the harm he is trying to avoid is greater than the harm the law defining the offense seeks to avoid.Define and comment on three of the six categories that are applicable to this defense.Analyze their good and bad points.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
44
Compare and contrast the difference between felonies,misdemeanors,and infractions.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
45
A rule for gauging insanity that was originally created in 1871 by a New Hampshire court is known as the ____________________ Rule.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
46
The Constitution prohibits the enactment of laws,which make acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.Ex __________ facto is the Latin term closely associated with this prohibition.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
47
______________ capacity is a defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be used to exonerate the defendant of guilt.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
48
The M'Naghten rule,the Durham rule,and the Brawner rule all are connected with insanity defense in criminal court.Define each rule and emphasize the difference between the three.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
49
Prosecutorial Misconduct is an example of a _____________ defense.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
50
Procedural defenses make the claim that the defendant was in some manner discriminated against in the justice process or that some important aspect of official procedure was not properly followed.List and define four of these defenses while commenting on their good and bad points.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
51
By definition a criminal action requires actus reus,mens rea,and concurrence to occur.Define and gives examples of these three actions.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
52
Match between columns
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Defense
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Alibi
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Justification
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Excuse
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Law
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Prosecutorial misconduct
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Entrapment
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Double jeopardy
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Diminished capacity
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Precedent
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Defense
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Alibi
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Justification
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Excuse
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Law
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Prosecutorial misconduct
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Entrapment
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Double jeopardy
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Diminished capacity
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Precedent
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Defense
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Alibi
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Justification
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Excuse
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Law
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Prosecutorial misconduct
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Entrapment
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Double jeopardy
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Diminished capacity
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Precedent
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Defense
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Alibi
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Justification
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Excuse
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Law
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Prosecutorial misconduct
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Entrapment
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Double jeopardy
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Diminished capacity
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Precedent
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Defense
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Alibi
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Justification
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Excuse
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Law
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Prosecutorial misconduct
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Entrapment
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Double jeopardy
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Diminished capacity
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Precedent
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Defense
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Alibi
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Justification
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Excuse
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Law
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Prosecutorial misconduct
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Entrapment
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Double jeopardy
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Diminished capacity
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Precedent
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Defense
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Alibi
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Justification
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Excuse
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Law
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Prosecutorial misconduct
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Entrapment
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Double jeopardy
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Diminished capacity
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Precedent
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Defense
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Alibi
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Justification
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Excuse
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Law
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Entrapment
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Double jeopardy
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Diminished capacity
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Precedent
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 52 flashcards in this deck.