Deck 45: The Antitrust Laws
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/47
Play
Full screen (f)
Deck 45: The Antitrust Laws
1
In most cases,only a probability of anticompetitive effect is necessary for Clayton Act violations.
True
2
Tie-in contracts occur when a seller refuses to sell a product to a buyer unless the buyer also purchases another product from the seller.
True
3
The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act provides that the Sherman Act shall never apply to nonimport trade.
False
4
The two components to a relevant market determination to decide if a firm has monopoly power are the geographic market and the product market.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
The ________ gives the federal courts broad injunctive powers to remedy antitrust violations.
A)Noerr Doctrine
B)Sherman Act
C)Parker Doctrine
D)Robinson-Patman Act
A)Noerr Doctrine
B)Sherman Act
C)Parker Doctrine
D)Robinson-Patman Act
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Under the Sherman Act,courts are given the power to order the dissolution of violators of the Act in extreme cases.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
Acts classified as per se illegal are presumed to be illegal.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
________ provides that the Sherman Act shall not apply to nonimport trade unless the conduct has a direct,substantial,and reasonably foreseeable effect on trade or commerce within the U.S,on the U.S.import trade,or on the activities of U.S.exporters.
A)The Robinson-Patman Act
B)The Clayton Act
C)The Noerr Doctrine
D)The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act
A)The Robinson-Patman Act
B)The Clayton Act
C)The Noerr Doctrine
D)The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
The federal government's right to regulate business is derived from the _____ of the U.S.Constitution.
A)Commerce Clause
B)Separation Clause
C)Due Process Clause
D)Renegade Clause
A)Commerce Clause
B)Separation Clause
C)Due Process Clause
D)Renegade Clause
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Anti-trust laws aim to maintain domestic and international competition and protect consumers from anti-trust conduct.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
Even behavior that affects only intrastate (purely local)commerce is within the scope of the federal antitrust laws.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
Foreign sovereign compulsion defense is in no way related to sovereign immunity.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
To which of the following antitrust violations do federal antitrust laws apply?
A)Behavior that affects only intrastate (purely local)commerce.
B)Behavior that substantially affects interstate commerce or international trade.
C)Behavior that affects external economies other than the U.S.
D)Any type of nonimport trade.
A)Behavior that affects only intrastate (purely local)commerce.
B)Behavior that substantially affects interstate commerce or international trade.
C)Behavior that affects external economies other than the U.S.
D)Any type of nonimport trade.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Section 1 of the Sherman Act aims to attack joint action in restraint of trade.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Since the Clayton Act deals with probable harms to competition,there is criminal liability for Clayton Act violations.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
The Sherman Act:
A)makes contracts in restraint of trade and monopolization illegal.
B)does not provide criminal penalties for violations of its provisions.
C)does not give the federal courts any injunctive powers.
D)was specifically designed to attack tie-in,exclusive dealing,and requirements contracts.
A)makes contracts in restraint of trade and monopolization illegal.
B)does not provide criminal penalties for violations of its provisions.
C)does not give the federal courts any injunctive powers.
D)was specifically designed to attack tie-in,exclusive dealing,and requirements contracts.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
The Parker Doctrine exempts many anticompetitive acts from the antitrust laws.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
Under no circumstances can a single firm lawfully refuse to deal with firms or agree to deal only on certain terms.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
Horizontal (among competitors)price fixing is always per se illegal.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
When a manufacturer states a "suggested retail price" for their products,this violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
Section 3 of the Clayton Act was designed to attack:
A)licensing arrangements.
B)exclusive dealing contracts.
C)aleatory contracts.
D)interlocking contracts.
A)licensing arrangements.
B)exclusive dealing contracts.
C)aleatory contracts.
D)interlocking contracts.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
Tie-in contracts:
A)violate Section 3 of the Clayton Act regardless of the seller having monopoly power in the tie-in product.
B)do not violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act under any circumstance.
C)violate Section 3 of the Clayton Act if the seller has foreclosed competitors from a substantial volume of commerce in the tied product.
D)violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
A)violate Section 3 of the Clayton Act regardless of the seller having monopoly power in the tie-in product.
B)do not violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act under any circumstance.
C)violate Section 3 of the Clayton Act if the seller has foreclosed competitors from a substantial volume of commerce in the tied product.
D)violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
A lawn and garden store agreeing to sell only Brand A lawn mowers is an example of:
A)a requirements contract.
B)an exclusive dealing contract.
C)a tie-in contract.
D)price discrimination.
A)a requirements contract.
B)an exclusive dealing contract.
C)a tie-in contract.
D)price discrimination.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
The abbreviated rule of reason analysis applies to:
A)restraints in which the overall reasonableness can be ascertained without a thorough examination of their pernicious and beneficial effects in the relevant markets.
B)restraints that have an obvious adverse impact on competition,but whose overall reasonableness cannot be immediately ascertained.
C)fully competitive behavior.
D)restraints that deserve a per se treatment because of their obvious unreasonableness.
A)restraints in which the overall reasonableness can be ascertained without a thorough examination of their pernicious and beneficial effects in the relevant markets.
B)restraints that have an obvious adverse impact on competition,but whose overall reasonableness cannot be immediately ascertained.
C)fully competitive behavior.
D)restraints that deserve a per se treatment because of their obvious unreasonableness.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
When a manufacturer sells goods to retail outlets and suggests a retail price,there is no violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act because:
A)there is no merger of any type.
B)there is no contract,combination,or conspiracy to fix the price.
C)there is no indication of an intent to monopolize.
D)there is no exclusive dealing contract.
A)there is no merger of any type.
B)there is no contract,combination,or conspiracy to fix the price.
C)there is no indication of an intent to monopolize.
D)there is no exclusive dealing contract.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
Section 3 of the Clayton Act applies to:
A)service contracts.
B)true consignments.
C)anticompetitive behavior.
D)monopolies.
A)service contracts.
B)true consignments.
C)anticompetitive behavior.
D)monopolies.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
Tie-in contracts are illegal under:
A)Section 3 of the Clayton Act.
B)Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
C)Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
D)Section 2(a)of the Robinson-Patman Act.
A)Section 3 of the Clayton Act.
B)Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
C)Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
D)Section 2(a)of the Robinson-Patman Act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
Section 1 of the Sherman Act applies to:
A)unilateral actions.
B)joint actions.
C)nonimport trade.
D)mergers.
A)unilateral actions.
B)joint actions.
C)nonimport trade.
D)mergers.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
Licensing arrangements are:
A)per se violations of U.S.anti-trust laws.
B)subject to the rule of reason.
C)subject to strict scrutiny analysis.
D)unlikely to raise antitrust issues.
A)per se violations of U.S.anti-trust laws.
B)subject to the rule of reason.
C)subject to strict scrutiny analysis.
D)unlikely to raise antitrust issues.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
Acme Candy,Inc.agrees to buy all the sugar it requires from one sugar refiner.Which type of contract is created in this case?
A)Requirements
B)Tie-in
C)Exclusive dealing
D)Interlocking
A)Requirements
B)Tie-in
C)Exclusive dealing
D)Interlocking
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
Which of the following is true of joint ventures?
A)They are arrangements in which two or more entities collaborate with respect to research,development,production,marketing,or distribution.
B)They directly violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
C)If the venture partners have complied with the act's notification requirements,they are liable for only treble damages in any civil suits that successfully challenge the arrangement.
D)They refer to the acquisition of one company by the other.
A)They are arrangements in which two or more entities collaborate with respect to research,development,production,marketing,or distribution.
B)They directly violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
C)If the venture partners have complied with the act's notification requirements,they are liable for only treble damages in any civil suits that successfully challenge the arrangement.
D)They refer to the acquisition of one company by the other.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
Which of the following is true of a consignment agreement?
A)If a manufacturer delivers all goods to its dealers on a consignment basis,the goods become the property of the dealer.
B)The owner of goods delivers them to another who is to act as the owner's agent in selling the goods.
C)If a manufacturer delivers all goods to its dealers on a consignment basis,the dealer can lawfully fix the price of those goods.
D)Consignments have been held to be joint action.
A)If a manufacturer delivers all goods to its dealers on a consignment basis,the goods become the property of the dealer.
B)The owner of goods delivers them to another who is to act as the owner's agent in selling the goods.
C)If a manufacturer delivers all goods to its dealers on a consignment basis,the dealer can lawfully fix the price of those goods.
D)Consignments have been held to be joint action.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
Which of the following is true of vertical price-fixing?
A)It is an attempt by competitors to interfere with the market and control prices.
B)Vertical price fixing is not within the scope of section 1 of the Sherman Act.
C)It is illegal per se for manufacturers to state a "suggested retail price" for their products.
D)It is an attempt by manufacturers to control the resale price of their products.
A)It is an attempt by competitors to interfere with the market and control prices.
B)Vertical price fixing is not within the scope of section 1 of the Sherman Act.
C)It is illegal per se for manufacturers to state a "suggested retail price" for their products.
D)It is an attempt by manufacturers to control the resale price of their products.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
The functional interchangeability test helps to determine if:
A)a firm controls a very high percentage share of the relevant market.
B)the plaintiff has standing to bring an antitrust suit.
C)there has been joint action.
D)the defendant had an anticompetitive intent.
A)a firm controls a very high percentage share of the relevant market.
B)the plaintiff has standing to bring an antitrust suit.
C)there has been joint action.
D)the defendant had an anticompetitive intent.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
Full rule of reason analysis:
A)cannot be determined until after a court conducts a full market analysis.
B)is a "quick look" form of rule of reason analysis.
C)like per se restraints,applies to restraints that are facially illegal.
D)is utilized for restraints that have an obvious adverse impact on competition.
A)cannot be determined until after a court conducts a full market analysis.
B)is a "quick look" form of rule of reason analysis.
C)like per se restraints,applies to restraints that are facially illegal.
D)is utilized for restraints that have an obvious adverse impact on competition.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
Section 2 of the Sherman Act:
A)outlaws monopolies.
B)outlaws the act of "monopolizing."
C)outlaws monopolies and monopolizing.
D)outlaws contracts,combinations,and conspiracies.
A)outlaws monopolies.
B)outlaws the act of "monopolizing."
C)outlaws monopolies and monopolizing.
D)outlaws contracts,combinations,and conspiracies.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
Acme Seeds,Inc.refuses to sell its seeds to farmers unless they also agree to buy fertilizer from Acme,this is an example of a(n):
A)requirements contract.
B)tie-in contract.
C)exclusive dealing contract.
D)indirect price discrimination.
A)requirements contract.
B)tie-in contract.
C)exclusive dealing contract.
D)indirect price discrimination.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
Horizontal price fixing:
A)is also called resale price fixing.
B)can be legally justified if there was a direct agreement between competitors.
C)occurs when the manufacturer gets the retailer to agree to follow the suggested retail price.
D)is an attempt by competitors to interfere with the market and control prices.
A)is also called resale price fixing.
B)can be legally justified if there was a direct agreement between competitors.
C)occurs when the manufacturer gets the retailer to agree to follow the suggested retail price.
D)is an attempt by competitors to interfere with the market and control prices.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
39
If a distributor persuades a manufacturer to refuse to deal with a rival distributor,the two parties:
A)have committed a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
B)do not violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act since this is a unilateral action.
C)are conspiring to form a monopoly thus directly violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
D)are attempting vertical price-fixing.
A)have committed a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
B)do not violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act since this is a unilateral action.
C)are conspiring to form a monopoly thus directly violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
D)are attempting vertical price-fixing.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
40
In a typical predatory-pricing scheme,the predator:
A)reflects changing conditions in the marketplace affecting the marketability of competitor's goods.
B)reduces the sale price of its product to below cost,hoping to drive competitors out of business.
C)grants a discriminatory price to a customer who has been offered a lawful,lower price by competitors.
D)furnishes customers with certain services that were not provided by the competitors.
A)reflects changing conditions in the marketplace affecting the marketability of competitor's goods.
B)reduces the sale price of its product to below cost,hoping to drive competitors out of business.
C)grants a discriminatory price to a customer who has been offered a lawful,lower price by competitors.
D)furnishes customers with certain services that were not provided by the competitors.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
41
An oil producer's merger with an oil refiner is an example of a:
A)conglomerate merger.
B)push down merger.
C)horizontal merger.
D)vertical merger.
A)conglomerate merger.
B)push down merger.
C)horizontal merger.
D)vertical merger.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
42
Describe the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
43
Describe the type of behavior Section 3 of the Clayton Act is designed to attack.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
44
Describe Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
45
Conglomerate mergers that create a potential for reciprocal dealing have been successfully challenged under:
A)Section 3 of the Clayton Act.
B)Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
C)Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
D)Section 2(a)of the Robinson-Patman Act.
A)Section 3 of the Clayton Act.
B)Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
C)Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
D)Section 2(a)of the Robinson-Patman Act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
46
Describe defenses to direct price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
47
If one automobile firm merges with another automobile firm it is called a:
A)push down merger.
B)vertical merger.
C)conglomerate merger.
D)horizontal merger.
A)push down merger.
B)vertical merger.
C)conglomerate merger.
D)horizontal merger.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 47 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck