
Law, Business and Society 11th Edition by Tony McAdams
Edition 11ISBN: 978-0078023866
Law, Business and Society 11th Edition by Tony McAdams
Edition 11ISBN: 978-0078023866 Exercise 13
In 2011, the federal government approved, with restrictions, a merger giving Comcast, the cable TV giant, a controlling interest in the NBC television network. Among other concerns, critics feared the merger would allow Comcast to arbitrarily favor NBC channels over those of competitors. Then in 2013, Comcast announced it was buying the remaining 49 percent of NBC Universal. From the inception of the merger discussions, one of the parties most concerned was the Santa Monica, California-based Tennis Channel, which feared Comcast would favor its own sports channels (Golf Channel and NBC Sports Network) over the Tennis Channel and other independents.
The Tennis Channel filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission alleging that Comcast is violating the law and the terms of the merger agreement by favorable placement for the Golf Channel and NBC Sports Network while leaving the Tennis Channel on a little-watched sports tier. Comcast says the channel placements reflect market realities and a long-term contract signed when the Tennis Channel was a start-up. In 2012, the FCC ruled for the Tennis Channel finding that Comcast was violating federal antidiscrimination carriage rules. At this writing, the case is on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (Case No. 12-1337) where the primary questions appear to be the statute of limitations for such complaints and whether restrictions on Comcast's treatment of the Tennis Channel would violate Comcast's freedom of speech.
Do you think Comcast has a responsibility to treat the independent Tennis Channel the same as its own affiliate sports networks, including the Golf Channel and NBC Sports Network Explain.
Sources: Michael Hiltzik, "Tennis Channel Gets No Love from Comcast," latimes.com, November 9,2011 [latimes.com/sports/la-fi-hiltzik-20111109,0,2769562.column]; and Alina Selyukh, "Court Grills FCC, Tennis Channel in Comcast Discrimination Suit," Reuters, February 25,2013 [ www.reuters.com/].
The Tennis Channel filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission alleging that Comcast is violating the law and the terms of the merger agreement by favorable placement for the Golf Channel and NBC Sports Network while leaving the Tennis Channel on a little-watched sports tier. Comcast says the channel placements reflect market realities and a long-term contract signed when the Tennis Channel was a start-up. In 2012, the FCC ruled for the Tennis Channel finding that Comcast was violating federal antidiscrimination carriage rules. At this writing, the case is on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (Case No. 12-1337) where the primary questions appear to be the statute of limitations for such complaints and whether restrictions on Comcast's treatment of the Tennis Channel would violate Comcast's freedom of speech.
Do you think Comcast has a responsibility to treat the independent Tennis Channel the same as its own affiliate sports networks, including the Golf Channel and NBC Sports Network Explain.
Sources: Michael Hiltzik, "Tennis Channel Gets No Love from Comcast," latimes.com, November 9,2011 [latimes.com/sports/la-fi-hiltzik-20111109,0,2769562.column]; and Alina Selyukh, "Court Grills FCC, Tennis Channel in Comcast Discrimination Suit," Reuters, February 25,2013 [ www.reuters.com/].
Explanation
C is a broadcasting company and it has t...
Law, Business and Society 11th Edition by Tony McAdams
Why don’t you like this exercise?
Other Minimum 8 character and maximum 255 character
Character 255