menu-iconExamlexExamLexServices

Discover

Ask a Question
  1. All Topics
  2. Topic
    Criminal Justice
  3. Study Set
    Tort Law
  4. Exam
    Exam 3: Intentional Torts
  5. Question
    The Classic Case of Katko V
Solved

The Classic Case of Katko V

Question 17

Question 17

True/False

The classic case of Katko v. Briney illustrates the principle that mechanical devices are generally allowed to defend property.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q12: To be held liable for an intentional

Q13: If an individual uses force to regain

Q14: A property owner may never use deadly

Q15: Consent can be inferred from custom or

Q16: A defendant can use force only in

Q18: In what way does the issue of

Q19: Deadly force can be used to prevent

Q20: A police officer can be held liable

Q21: Conversion suits are never allowed for intangible

Q22: The majority of American courts permit landlords

Examlex

ExamLex

About UsContact UsPerks CenterHomeschoolingTest Prep

Work With Us

Campus RepresentativeInfluencers

Links

FaqPricingChrome Extension

Download The App

Get App StoreGet Google Play

Policies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines

Scan To Download

qr-code

Copyright © (2025) ExamLex LLC.

Privacy PolicyTerms Of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines