Multiple Choice
According to SCOTUS in Michigan v. Sitz (1990) , involving sobriety checkpoints, detaining a car briefly at a sobriety checkpoint requires:
A) reasonable suspicion that the driver is driving under the influence.
B) probable cause that the driver is driving under the influence.
C) clear and convincing evidence that the driver is driving under the influence.
D) no individualized suspicion, because of the importance of the state's interest in addressing the drunk driving problem.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q55: Which of the following will not support
Q56: In the 1960s, SCOTUS shifted away from
Q57: Adams v. Williams (1972)upheld a stop and
Q58: An officer conducting a protective pat-down search
Q59: In Maryland v. Wilson (1997), the case
Q60: Information received from anonymous informants is always
Q62: The two elements to the scope of
Q63: Explain the reason for reduced individual Fourth
Q64: Rules to tell officers, courts, and the
Q65: The _ _ - _ _ exception