Multiple Choice
A woman forged her husband's signature on dozens of cheques. In an attempt to protect her from prosecution, the husband signed a letter prepared by the Bank agreeing to assume all liability for the forged cheques. What would the Court find in relation to this agreement?
A) As an agreement to stifle a criminal prosecution, it was an illegal contract and therefore void.
B) The agreement was unenforceable because the Bank lacked capacity to enter into such an agreement.
C) The agreement was unenforceable because the husband was under duress at the time he signed it.
D) While the Bank acted improperly, "freedom to contract" establishes that the agreement must be enforced.
E) Because the husband acted improperly, the agreement was voidable by the Bank on the basis of illegality.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q113: The contract signed by XYZ Ltd. and
Q114: Sue had a beautiful lakeside cottage that
Q115: Which of the following agreements has to
Q116: In which of the following situations would
Q117: The nature of the legislation governing incorporation
Q119: In which of the following situations would
Q120: All commercial contracts must be evidenced by
Q121: "If an infant can't be sued in
Q122: Discuss agreements that restrict competition or that
Q123: Whenever an adult enters into a contract