Exam 10: The Interpretation of Contracts
Exam 1: Law, society, and Business57 Questions
Exam 2: The Machinery of Justice61 Questions
Exam 3: The Law of Torts76 Questions
Exam 4: Professional Liability: the Legal Challenges55 Questions
Exam 5: Formation of a Contract: Offer and Acceptance54 Questions
Exam 6: Formation of a Contract: Consideration and Intention51 Questions
Exam 7: Formation of a Contract: Capacity to Contract and Legality of Object56 Questions
Exam 8: Grounds Upon Which a Contract May Be Set Aside: Mistake and Misrepresentation107 Questions
Exam 9: The Requirement of Writing54 Questions
Exam 10: The Interpretation of Contracts51 Questions
Exam 11: Privity of Contract and the Assignment of Contractual Rights53 Questions
Exam 12: The Discharge of Contracts63 Questions
Exam 14: Sale of Goods70 Questions
Exam 15: Bailment and Leasing64 Questions
Exam 16: Insurance and Guarantee62 Questions
Exam 17: Agency and Franchising54 Questions
Exam 18: The Contract of Employment54 Questions
Exam 19: Negotiable Instruments61 Questions
Exam 20: Intellectual Property52 Questions
Exam 21: Interests in Land and Their Transfer58 Questions
Exam 22: Landlord and Tenant56 Questions
Exam 23: Mortgages of Land and Real Estate Transactions51 Questions
Exam 24: Sole Proprietorships and Partnerships56 Questions
Exam 25: The Nature of a Corporation and Its Formation60 Questions
Exam 26: Corporate Governance: the Internal Affairs of Corporations64 Questions
Exam 27: Corporate Governance: External Responsibilities58 Questions
Exam 28: Secured Transactions56 Questions
Exam 29: Creditors Rights61 Questions
Exam 30: Government Regulation of Business54 Questions
Exam 31: International Business Transactions66 Questions
Exam 32: Electronic Commerce56 Questions
Exam 33: Privacy63 Questions
Exam 34: Breach of Contract and Its Remedies109 Questions
Select questions type
The parol evidence rule does not permit evidence of oral contracts entered into between the parties after they enter into a written agreement.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)
Correct Answer:
False
The dictionary meaning of a word does not always clarify its meaning.Explain.
Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
One of the approaches to interpretation is the plain or ordinary meaning approach.This requires that in interpreting a contract,the courts adopt the dictionary or ordinary meaning of the words.However,the ordinary meaning does not always clarify its meaning.This is because words may have more than one meaning even in the dictionary.As well,the ordinary meaning of words,as found in the dictionary,could change depending on the context.
A agrees to buy a share in B's invention for a certain sum on the condition that C first approves the invention.However,the written contract makes no reference to C's approval.C never gives his approval.B now sues A for the purchase price.In this situation,
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
B
The parol evidence rule excludes evidence about the formation of a contract.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
A business contract includes a term saying that a manufacturer will use "smooth-grained sand" in a construction project "if this quality is available.The court will most likely imply that the terms of the contract require the manufacturer to put reasonable efforts into trying to find the specified materials.This is an example of the court introducing an implied term based on
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)
The dictionary meaning of a word does not always clarify its meaning.Explain.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(27)
The contra proferentem rule is used against the party who made the contract in favour of the party who did not.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)
Evidence regarding certain oral terms that were discussed between the parties to a contract that has been reduced to writing
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(44)
The plaintiffs were growers of oranges in Spain and the defendants were ship owners.The plaintiffs wished to export their oranges to England and shipped them to the defendants' vessel,relying on an oral promise by the defendants' agent that the vessel would sail straight to London.In fact,the vessel went first to Antwerp,so that the oranges arrived late in London and the plaintiffs lost a favourable market.When the plaintiffs claimed damages for breach of contract,the defendant owners relied on the bill of lading,which expressly allowed them to proceed "by any route whether directly or indirectly" to London.In this case,
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
The consideration for a main contract can be a collateral contract.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(30)
The parol evidence rule does not permit evidence of oral contracts entered into between the parties before they enter into a written agreement.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
Which of the following is NOT a usual source of implied terms?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)
The contra proferentem rule establishes a form of equality among the parties to a contract.Explain.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(42)
A and B have just signed a written agreement for the purchase by A of B's house.During the negotiations,A made it clear to B that his purchase was conditional on A conducting a building inspection of house within five days of the date of the agreement,which was satisfactory to A.However,this condition is not included in the agreement.In this situation,
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
In the formation of a contract,the intention of the parties may be just as important as the essential elements of the contract.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(39)
Showing 1 - 20 of 51
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)