Exam 21: Holder in Due Course and Liability of Parties
The imposter rule applies when you write a check to someone who does not exist.
False
Vince and Jennifer are good friends.In August,2010,Jennifer borrowed $5,000 from Vince for tuition and has been paying him in installments.Over the next few months Vince grew fond of Jennifer and asked her on a date.The date went well,even though Jennifer repeatedly told Vince that she wanted to stay good friends and no more.Vince,however,has grown to love her.When she shows up to make her December payment,Vince not only rips up her payment check but rips up the promissory note evidencing the debt declaring that he doesn't want her money and she is now free of the debt.She thanks him,shakes his hand,and gives him a peck on the cheek then leaves.That afternoon,Vince goes to a coffee shop and sees Jennifer and Brad in a corner booth kissing passionately.Vince is infuriated.He goes home and pulls the ripped promissory note out of the garbage and tapes the forty pieces together.He then e-mails Jennifer telling her that he expects to be paid on the note.Discuss Vince and Jennifer's rights and whether the note is still enforceable and negotiable.
Jennifer has committed no fraud and did not lead him along lying to get the note cancelled.When Vince ripped the note up and declared her free from liability he discharged her from any further payment.Taping the note together does not reconstruct the debt.His voluntary and intentional act,particularly coupled with his statements,extinguished the enforceability of the instrument.The fact that it is in forty pieces and taped would destroy any possible negotiability because anyone presented with this note would have good reason to question whether it has a defense against it and any person who accepted the instrument could not do so in good faith.(Note,an instrument ripped once and taped might be explainable,but not one ripped into 40 pieces.)
Which of the following is true about the requirement for a holder in due course to give value for an instrument?
D
If an unauthorized agent signs a note on behalf of a principal,then only the agent is liable on the note.
Generally,all parties to a negotiable instrument are discharged from liability if (1)the party primarily liable on the instrument pays it in full to the holder of the instrument,or (2)a drawee in good faith pays an unaccepted draft or check in full to the holder.
A signature in the upper-right corner of a promissory note indicates that the signer is the drawer of the note.
The holder of a negotiable instrument has fewer rights than an assignee of an ordinary,nonnegotiable contract.
A holder who does not qualify as a holder in due course in his or her own right becomes a holder in due course if he or she acquires the instrument through a holder in due course.This is called the "transference" principle.
With few exceptions,an unauthorized indorsement is wholly inoperative as the indorsement of the person whose name is signed.
A holder in due course takes an instrument free of which defenses?
Under the Uniform Commercial Code,value has not been given if the holder acquires a security interest in or lien on the instrument.
What does it mean for liability on a negotiable instrument to be secondary liability?
A party who signs an instrument for the purpose of lending his or her name (and credit)to another party to the instrument is the ________ party.
Makers of promissory notes and certificates of deposit have ________ liability for the instruments.
Martha is elderly,does not speak or read English very well,and is unsophisticated in business matters.A salesman convinces her to sign a negotiable note by telling Martha that it is a receipt for his visit.The salesman properly negotiates this note to a holder in due course,who tries to collect from Martha.Martha's defense to this note is:
To qualify as a holder in due course under the shelter principle,the holder must acquire the instrument from a holder in due course,or be able to trace his or her title back to a holder in due course.
How does the definition of value for purposes of holder in due course differ from the definition of consideration? Why do you think there is a difference? Should there be a difference?
In terms of signature liability on a negotiable instrument,if it is unclear who the signer is,the parol evidence rule would prohibit consideration of outside evidence to identify the signer.
To qualify as a holder in due course under the shelter principle,the holder can have notice of a defense or claim against the payment of the instrument.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)