Exam 5: Fraud in Financial Statements and Auditor Responsibilities
What is the purpose of having required auditor communications between the external auditor and the audit committee?
The audit committee helps those charged with governance fulfill their oversight responsibilities with respect to the entity's financial reporting process and the system of internal control. In exercising this oversight responsibility, the audit committee needs information from the external auditors about their experiences assessing internal controls and corporate governance as well as any issues faced during their audit that involve differences with management on financial reporting issues. The audit committee should support the external auditors in their role to ensure the examination of the financial statements proceeds as required under generally accepted auditing and PCAOB standards. The audit committee serves as a check on ethical systems in the organization.
The PCAOB has no jurisdiction over audit committees, so PCAOB Auditing Standard 16, Communications with Audit Committees, has requirements which are aimed strictly at external auditors. The standard requires auditors to:
Establish the understanding of the terms of the audit engagement with the audit committee. The terms of the engagement must be recorded in an engagement letter.
Provide audit committees with an overview of the overall audit strategy, including the timing of the audit, significant risks the auditor identified, and significant changes to the planned audit strategy or risks.
Provide information about others involved in the audit, including internal auditors or other independent public accounting firms.
Give information regarding the company's accounting policies, practices, estimates, and significant unusual transactions.
Provide an evaluation of the quality of the company's financial reporting, including conclusions regarding critical accounting estimates and the company's financial statement presentation; difficult or contentious matters for which the auditor consulted outside the engagement team; the auditor's evaluation of the company's ability to continue as a going concern; and difficulties encountered in performing the audit.
Given the importance of an independent audit in detecting fraud in financial statements, the auditor should discuss with the audit committee relationships that create threats to auditor independence and the related safeguards that have been applied to eliminate or reduce those threats to an acceptable level.
Another important area for communication is about accounting estimates. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from management's current judgments. In communicating with those charged with governance about the process used by management in formulating sensitive estimates, including fair value estimates, and about the basis for the auditor's conclusions regarding the reasonableness of those estimates, the auditor should consider the following:
The nature of significant assumptions
The degree of subjectivity involved in the development of the assumptions, and
The relative materiality of the items being measured to the financial statements as a whole
If the auditor, as a result of the assessment of the risks of material misstatement, has identified such risks due to fraud that have continuing control implications the auditor should consider whether these risks represent significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the entity's internal controls that should be communicated to management and those charged with governance. The auditor should also consider whether the absence of or deficiencies in controls to prevent, deter, and detect fraud represent significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that should be communicated to management and those charged with governance.
The difference between errors in the financial statements as compared to fraud is:
B
Which of the following is NOT a pressure that might lead to fraud?
D
The best explanation why the fraud at Tyco was not discovered and acted on is:
Which of the following elements were NOT part of the fraud at Tyco?
Which of the following is NOT addressed in the Diamond Foods case?
The framework of COSO's Enterprise Risk Management can best be characterized as:
All of the following tend to be rationalizations for fraud except:
Why is materiality one of the most difficult judgments to make in auditing financial statements?
Which of the following is an element of the introductory paragraph of an auditor's report under AICPA standards?
Which of the following is NOT something external auditors are expected to do in looking for fraud?
Which of the following is the most likely reason for an auditor to issue an adverse opinion?
Auditors are required to communicate with the audit committee all but which of the following:
In an audit, the auditor has a requirement to address risk assessment with respect to:
Differentiate between the auditors' responsibilities to detect errors, fraud, and illegal acts. How would you assess the ethics of a company that has experienced each event with respect to motivation and the integrity of those who go along with such events?
The primary issue in the Rooster, Hen, Footer and Burger case is:
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)