Exam 7: Crime
Exam 1: Introduction to Law43 Questions
Exam 2: Business Ethics and Social Responsibility45 Questions
Exam 3: Courts,Litigation and Alterntive Dispute Resolution45 Questions
Exam 4: Constitutional, Statutory, Administrative, and Common Law44 Questions
Exam 5: Intentional Torts and Business Torts44 Questions
Exam 6: Negligence and Strict Liability46 Questions
Exam 7: Crime44 Questions
Exam 8: International Law44 Questions
Exam 9: Introduction to Contracts47 Questions
Exam 10: Contract Impediments49 Questions
Exam 11: Conclusion to Contracts46 Questions
Exam 12: Practical Contracts46 Questions
Exam 13: Introduction to Sales46 Questions
Exam 14: Negotiable Instruments44 Questions
Exam 15: Secured Transactions45 Questions
Exam 16: Bankruptcy45 Questions
Exam 17: Agency Law46 Questions
Exam 18: Employment Law45 Questions
Exam 19: Employment Discrimination45 Questions
Exam 20: Labor Law46 Questions
Exam 21: Starting a Business: Llcs and Other Option46 Questions
Exam 22: Life and Death of a Corporation45 Questions
Exam 23: Government Regulation: Securities and Antitrust45 Questions
Exam 24: Accountants' Liability45 Questions
Exam 25: Consumer Law47 Questions
Exam 26: Environmental Law46 Questions
Exam 27: Cyberlaw43 Questions
Exam 28: Intellectual Property45 Questions
Exam 29: Real Property and Tenant: Landlord Law45 Questions
Exam 30: Personal Property and Bailment48 Questions
Exam 31: Estate Planning44 Questions
Exam 32: Insurance33 Questions
Select questions type
Mary was suspicious of her neighbor,whom she thought was involved in selling illegal drugs.One day Mary arrived at her apartment and saw a large paper sack tied up with string in front of her neighbor's door.She took the bundle into her apartment,opened it,and discovered it was full of cocaine.She called the police and the neighbor was arrested.The neighbor's lawyer claimed the evidence had been illegally obtained since no probable cause existed to justify opening up the paper bundle.
Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(28)
Correct Answer:
The evidence was lawfully obtained.The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches only applies to government officials.The Fourth Amendment does not extend protection to persons from the acts of private citizens who act totally independently and then report their findings to the police.Civil law would provide any available remedies.
Entrapment can be a valid defense to a criminal act.
Free
(True/False)
4.7/5
(37)
Correct Answer:
True
Miguel reprogrammed a cellular telephone so that it intercepted electronic funds transfers and rerouted them to Miguel's bank account.What crime has he committed?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(27)
Correct Answer:
B
In order for the government to obtain a criminal conviction,it must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(28)
Dan was arrested and taken to an interrogation room for questioning.After signing a statement waiving his Miranda rights,he agreed to answer questions without a lawyer.After about ten minutes,he told the officers he changed his mind and wanted to talk to a lawyer before answering any more questions.The officers left the room and then came back in.They told Dan that his partner was confessing to the crime and that,"If your partner confesses first and makes a deal,you're the one who's going to go down for this." Dan looked at them without saying anything.After a minute,the officer began questioning Dan again and he confessed to the crime after about an hour.Is this confession admissible?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)
Actus reus means the "guilty act" and is one element the prosecution must prove in a criminal case.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
The Miranda warning insures that the criminal suspects understand their constitutional rights relating to:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)
What does the Fourth Amendment provided a criminal defendant?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)
Sarah,an employee of Amex Corporation,committed a serious criminal act in an attempt to obtain a large sales order for her employer.A court found her guilty of the felony and also found the corporation guilty of criminal conduct.The company was fined $1 million.The court:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Miranda v.Arizona considered the intent requirement in an armed robbery case.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)
Roger assaulted Jim in a tavern,causing medical expenses and lost wages. Which of the following is true?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(27)
Barden Corporation was convicted of violating federal RICO laws.Accordingly:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
Criminal defendants have the right to a lawyer at all the important stages of the criminal process.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(38)
Taking a personal property without paying for it is a common type of larceny.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
Tina is an undercover police officer.One evening she is posing as a prostitute in a bar.Larry,a salesman who is attending an out-of-state convention,begins talking with Tina.After about ten minutes,Tina suggests going to her room for a good time but points out he will need to "donate" $100 to her.Arriving at Tina's hotel room,Larry asks if she is a policewoman.Tina lies and says she is not.When Larry gives her $100,Tina shows him her identification and arrests him.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
Sid burned his own warehouse in an attempt to collect on a fire insurance policy.Sid has committed:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)
Illegally obtained evidence is not permitted to be used at a criminal trial based upon the:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(42)
Showing 1 - 20 of 44
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)