Exam 10: Consumption Demand
Exam 1: Economic Growth, Fluctuation, and Policy55 Questions
Exam 2: Measuring Economic Performance55 Questions
Exam 3: Employment, Job Creation, and Job Destruction60 Questions
Exam 4: Long-Run Economic Growth46 Questions
Exam 5: Technology and Economic Growth50 Questions
Exam 6: Growth and the World Economy50 Questions
Exam 7: Short-Run Fluctuations35 Questions
Exam 8: Financial Markets and Aggregate Demand55 Questions
Exam 9: The Economic Fluctuations Model80 Questions
Exam 10: Consumption Demand58 Questions
Exam 11: Investment Demand52 Questions
Exam 12: Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate64 Questions
Exam 13: Spending, Taxes, and the Budget Deficit49 Questions
Exam 14: The Monetary System61 Questions
Exam 15: The Microeconomic Foundations of Price Rigidity73 Questions
Exam 16: The Macroeconomic Policy Model32 Questions
Exam 17: The New Normative Macroeconomics33 Questions
Exam 18: Macroeconomic Policy in the World Economy53 Questions
Select questions type
Errors made by researchers using the long-term estimate of the marginal propensity to consume to predict short-term movement in consumption can be extremely large. It is important, therefore, to understand when those errors might occur. If you were to draw the simple Keynesian consumption with MPC = 0.94 on a piece of graph paper, then you would expect to plot
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
An intuitive explanation of the observed discrepancy between short- and long-run marginal propensities to consume must focus on why
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
An increase in the marginal propensity to consume is most accurately thought of as
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
It has been argued that, "A tax cut must be followed later by a tax increase to pay for the resulting deficit" is the self-fulfilling prophecy of those who use it to predict that an income windfall from a tax reduction must be temporary. The argument can be supported by
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Suppose that an individual anticipated that the next calendar year's income would be $1,000 higher than this year's. Facing a real interest rate of 0 percent and a 20-year planning horizon, you would expect her annual real consumption to
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
For the past 30 years in the United States, the long- and short-run marginal propensities to consume have been estimated to be
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
The short-run marginal propensity to consume is estimated on the basis of
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
Ando and Modigliani postulated a consumption function depending on not only disposable income but also the value of assets in which people keep their wealth. The estimated coefficient for asset value
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
The short-run marginal propensity to consume can be derived statistically by calculating how
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Short-run marginal propensities to consume are smaller than long-run propensities in part because
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(27)
The impact of an increase in the real interest rate on consumption
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(45)
Knowing the desired size of the bequest is important in predicting the path of future consumption,
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
Let the consumption function be given by C = 0.85 + 0.8YDP with permanent disposable income specified according to YDP = 0.75YD +
0)25YD-1). Let there be a permanent $1,000 increase in income. Two years later, consumption will have increased by
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Suppose that people looked upon a $1,000 windfall as 50 percent permanent and 50 percent temporary. The short-run marginal propensity to consume out of that $1,000
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
As consumption becomes more sensitive to the real rate of interest,
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)
Which of the following circumstances is likely to exaggerate the expected shift in an IS curve in response to a reduction in taxes?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)
Showing 41 - 58 of 58
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)