Exam 13: Defamation and Related Torts
Exam 1: Overview of Tort Law27 Questions
Exam 2: Overview of a Tort Case45 Questions
Exam 3: Intentional Torts65 Questions
Exam 4: Negligence: Duty43 Questions
Exam 5: Negligence: Breach of Duty28 Questions
Exam 6: Negligence: Causation40 Questions
Exam 7: Negligence: Damages64 Questions
Exam 8: Negligence: Defenses72 Questions
Exam 9: Malpractice28 Questions
Exam 10: Misrepresentation, Nuisance, and Other Torts76 Questions
Exam 11: Strict Liability26 Questions
Exam 12: Product Liability79 Questions
Exam 13: Defamation and Related Torts67 Questions
Exam 14: Vicarious Liability43 Questions
Exam 15: Joint Liability39 Questions
Exam 16: Tort Reform72 Questions
Exam 17: Automobile Insurance61 Questions
Exam 18: Bad Faith38 Questions
Exam 19: Workers Compensation53 Questions
Select questions type
Define "actual malice."
Free
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(38)
Correct Answer:
Acting with knowledge of the falsity of one's statement or with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity of one's statement
Defamation plaintiffs can easily get behind the anonymity of someone who posts a defamatory message on the Internet by issuing a subpoena to the Internet Service Provider.
Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
False
Give an example of a qualified privilege.
Free
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
Reports of public proceedings.
Statements implying undisclosed facts may be actionable even if they are opinions.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(28)
How does the Uniform Correction or Clarification of Defamation Act protect media defendants?
(Essay)
4.7/5
(31)
The purpose of a statute is to discourage defamation suits by either barring the plaintiff's recovery if the defendant takes back the defamatory statement or by providing the plaintiff with the opportunity to respond.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(44)
Judges, lawyers, parties, and witnesses enjoy an privilege for statements made during judicial proceedings, while reports prepared during court proceedings enjoy a privilege.
(Short Answer)
5.0/5
(35)
An invasion of the reputation of a group or individuals resulting from slander or libel is referred to as .
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(40)
The Act requires plaintiffs request a correction or clarification from the defendant within ninety days of learning of the publication.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(38)
Reading the plaintiff's private mail or searching through her purse can be the basis for a claim of unreasonable intrusion.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(34)
Defamation can be shown even if the defendant's reputation is tarnished in the eyes of only a minority of persons in the community.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(40)
A statement will not be considered defamatory unless it mentions the plaintiff by name.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)
A plaintiff must prove in that the statement must be seen or heard by someone other than the plaintiff.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(41)
Statements that are pure expressions of opinion cannot be defamatory.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)
Because of legislation passed by Congress it has become increasingly easier for those defamed by statements made on the Internet to recover for defamation.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
If the defendant is a or a , the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with , that is, with knowledge that the statement was false or with reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the statement.
(Essay)
4.7/5
(33)
The , which consists of four distinct torts, evolved from a law review article written by Samuel Warren and Lewis Brandeis.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(36)
Showing 1 - 20 of 67
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)