Exam 5: Thinking Critically and Developing Ideas
Exam 1: Read This First37 Questions
Exam 2: Writing Reports40 Questions
Exam 3: Writing Essays30 Questions
Exam 4: Finding and Using Reference Material37 Questions
Exam 5: Thinking Critically and Developing Ideas32 Questions
Exam 6: Writing Correctly and With Style40 Questions
Exam 7: Writing for Other Forms of Assessment30 Questions
Select questions type
False generalisation is a flaw demonstrated when writers overgeneralise and incorrectly assume that evidence uncovered in one setting will also apply to a very different context.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(38)
The advantage of experiments is that they enable researchers to establish the direction of __________.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(31)
A writer is being intellectually _________ when he or she only accepts the arguments of others when they are logical, complete, and supported by research.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(35)
Spurious variable refers to variables that confuse the results (such as the order of conditions).
(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)
In quasi-experiments, participants are randomly assigned to conditions or groups.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(28)
The theory that violence on TV provokes agitation, and this agitation promotes suspicion, implies at least two associations:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(35)
According to Zechmeister and Johnson (1992), students are likely to be thinking critically if they are intellectually sceptical, i.e., wanting to know the truth.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(36)
The direction of causality cannot be inferred logically from ____________.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(42)
Where a writer accepts evidence and arguments even if they contradict their own beliefs, they are regarded as being intellectually _________.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(43)
Limitations in the methods refers to observations that do not support the theory - that is, the findings might suggest that the theory does not apply in all settings or contexts, such as cultures, locations, demographics, or situations.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
A/an ____________ argument is when a writer attacks the character of the opposition, rather than the opinions of the opposition.
(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(30)
Showing 21 - 32 of 32
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)