Exam 8: Business Torts
Exam 1: Introduction to Law113 Questions
Exam 2: Business Ethics and Social Responsibility122 Questions
Exam 3: The Court System and Dispute Resolution126 Questions
Exam 4: Business and the Constitution120 Questions
Exam 5: Administrative Law124 Questions
Exam 6: International Law116 Questions
Exam 7: Business Crime123 Questions
Exam 8: Business Torts125 Questions
Exam 9: Environmental Regulation and Sustainability115 Questions
Exam 10: Contracts and Sales: Introduction and Formation125 Questions
Exam 11: Contracts and Sales: Performance, Remedies, and Rights125 Questions
Exam 12: Business Marketing and Products: Ads and Product Safety42 Questions
Exam 13: Business Competition: Antitrust Law123 Questions
Exam 14: Business and Intellectual Property Law98 Questions
Exam 15: Agency Law107 Questions
Exam 16: Governance and Structure: the Law of Business Associations125 Questions
Exam 17: Governance and Regulation: Securities Law124 Questions
Exam 18: Business and Employees: Employment Regulation85 Questions
Exam 19: Business and Employees: Employment Discrimination124 Questions
Select questions type
The landmark case for proximate cause is:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(26)
Correct Answer:
B
Assumption of the risk requires knowledge of the risk and voluntarily doing it.
Free
(True/False)
4.7/5
(41)
Correct Answer:
True
Which of the following is not a breach of duty for purposes of establishing negligence?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(43)
Correct Answer:
D
Asking a buyer to break their existing contract with another supplier is tortious interference.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(37)
Which of the following constitutes a defamatory statement (assuming the statements are untrue)?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
Three boys were leaving Wal-Mart when they were stopped by plain clothes security officers. One officer said, "Those shirts that you have on were stolen." One boy said, "You can't be serious." The officer responded, "Yes, I am. Come with me." The boys then went with the officers to a side door and into an office. The boys' parents have filed suit against Wal-Mart. Discuss what their suit might be for and what defenses Wal-Mart has.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(43)
A breach of duty can still be established for negligence cases even when the defendant has complied with the law.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
Galley, Inc. has a contract for operating the kitchen at the Palm Crest Hotel in Miami, Florida. Mealco has approached Palm Crest's director of operations and stated, "Look, sign with us. We'll take care of whatever damages you owe Galley." Suppose Mealco added the following phrase, "Galley is going under fast. They haven't paid rent in five months and their rent is $15,000 per month." Galley is current on its rent, and its rent is $5000 per month. Mealco's statements:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
In most states, letters of reference are exempt from liability for defamation.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(34)
To establish assumption of risk, the defendant must show that the plaintiff was aware of the risk and accepted it voluntarily.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(41)
Giving an unfavorable review of a product in a magazine is called product disparagement, a type of defamation.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)
Members of Congress enjoy an absolute privilege for their speech while on the floor.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)
The Arizona Daily Desert View carried a story on a recent E-Coli problem in a Phoenix fast food restaurant. The story included a history of Arizona E-Coli incidents and indicated that the Saguaro Grill had an E-Coli problem in 1999 that resulted in the hospitalization of seven customers. The owner of the Saguaro Grill called the newspaper and complained because the newspaper was rehashing an incident from nearly 10 years ago that damaged its reputation. The Arizona Daily Desert View :
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)
"Car dealers are crooked" is an example of actionable defamation.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)
During an altercation, Tyrone hits LaQuisha several times causing LaQuisha pain and injuries. Discuss LaQuisha's options to this situation.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(41)
Which of the following does not enjoy an absolute privilege to charges of defamation?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
The distinguishing element between intentional torts and negligent torts is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
Showing 1 - 20 of 125
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)