Exam 11: Conduct Invalidating Assent
Exam 1: Introduction to Law78 Questions
Exam 2: Business Ethics68 Questions
Exam 3: Civil Dispute Resolution101 Questions
Exam 4: Constitutional Law113 Questions
Exam 5: Administrative Law77 Questions
Exam 6: Criminal Law90 Questions
Exam 7: Intentional Torts103 Questions
Exam 8: Negligence and Strict Liability97 Questions
Exam 9: Introduction to Contracts72 Questions
Exam 10: Mutual Assent95 Questions
Exam 11: Conduct Invalidating Assent80 Questions
Exam 12: Consideration85 Questions
Exam 13: Illegal Bargains70 Questions
Exam 14: Contractual Capacity74 Questions
Exam 15: Contracts in Writing79 Questions
Exam 16: Third Parties to Contracts85 Questions
Exam 17: Performance, Breach, and Discharge70 Questions
Exam 18: Contract Remedies67 Questions
Exam 19: Introduction to Sales and Leases66 Questions
Exam 20: Performance61 Questions
Exam 21: Transfer of Title and Risk of Loss69 Questions
Exam 22: Product Liability: Warranties and Strict Liability73 Questions
Exam 23: Sales Remedies74 Questions
Exam 24: Form and Content67 Questions
Exam 25: Transfer and Holder in Due Course71 Questions
Exam 26: Liability of Parties72 Questions
Exam 27: Bank Deposits, Collections, and Funds Transfers66 Questions
Exam 28: Relationship of Principal and Agent84 Questions
Exam 29: Relationship With Third Parties84 Questions
Exam 30: Formation and Internal Relations of General Partnerships70 Questions
Exam 31: Operation and Dissolution of General Partnerships69 Questions
Exam 32: Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies68 Questions
Exam 33: Nature and Formation of Corporations80 Questions
Exam 34: Financial Structure of Corporations79 Questions
Exam 35: Management Structure of Corporations99 Questions
Exam 36: Fundamental Changes of Corporations78 Questions
Exam 37: Secured Transactions and Suretyship80 Questions
Exam 38: Bankruptcy98 Questions
Exam 39: Securities Regulation89 Questions
Exam 40: Intellectual Property78 Questions
Exam 41: Employment Law97 Questions
Exam 42: Antitrust80 Questions
Exam 43: Accountants Legal Liability66 Questions
Exam 44: Consumer Protection81 Questions
Exam 45: Environmental Law71 Questions
Exam 46: International Business Law80 Questions
Exam 47: Introduction to Property, Property Insurance, Bailments, and Documents of Title83 Questions
Exam 48: Interests in Real Property80 Questions
Exam 49: Transfer and Control of Real Property89 Questions
Exam 50: Trusts and Wills77 Questions
Select questions type
Matt sells bikes at a local discount store. To encourage Bob to buy a more expensive model than he originally contemplated, Matt tells Bob, "This is the most awesome bike money can buy at this price. You can expect lots of riding pleasure." Based on this statement Bob buys the bike. A week later, before his bike is fully paid for, Bob sees a far superior bike for a lower price at another store. Bob can avoid his contract with Matt because of fraudulent misrepresentation.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)
Which of the following, if any, are requisites for fraud in the inducement?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(38)
If incorrect, which of the following would probably be considered a misrepresentation of a material fact?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(43)
For rescission to be available as a remedy for a false statement, a misrepresentation must have been made with scienter.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(42)
Al owns a farm that he believes is worth $150,000. Betty knows that there is oil under the farm and offers Al $160,000 for it. Al accepts and sells the farm to Betty. Al later realizes that the land was worth more than $160,000. Al can have the contract avoided based upon fraud.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(37)
Sam wants to sell his golden retriever to Al. Sam tells Al that the dog is three years old and that he will point, back, and retrieve. Al relies on these statements and purchases the bird dog. Although the dog is three years old and will point at birds, he will not back (honor another dog's point). The buyer has most probably been a victim of:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
Physical compulsion and improper threats are the two basic types of duress.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(40)
The law requires that to form a valid contract the agreement must be voluntary and knowing.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)
Predictions, opinions, and promissory statements ordinarily do not constitute bases of fraud.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)
To obtain relief for negligent or innocent misrepresentation, the elements of fraud must be present but the misrepresentation need not be material.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(41)
Albert found a stone in his yard and took it to Bob, a jeweler, for evaluation. Bob wasn't sure as to the nature of the stone, but told Albert he thought it was a topaz. Bob then offered to buy the stone for $25 and Albert agreed. Later Albert found out the stone was an uncut diamond worth about $700. The sales contract:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)
James threatens to hit Kenneth in the head with a baseball bat unless Kenneth signs a contract agreeing to pay James $400 for his saw. Because of the threat, Kenneth signs the contract.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
A voluntary choice of perfectly legitimate alternatives may in some instances constitute economic duress.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(41)
Hal holds a gun to Irving's head and tells him to sign the contract. Irving signs the contract, because he fears for his personal safety. The contract is void, because it was entered into under duress.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
Scienter is the element of fraud that requires that the misrepresentation must have been known by the one making it to be false and must have been made with an intent to deceive.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(27)
The law would most likely impose a duty of disclosure in a transaction between:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
a. What are the two types of duress and what is the effect of each on the contract involved?
b. Give an example of each type of duress.
c. Who does the law intend to protect by reason of the defense of duress? Why does the law protect this type of person?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)
In the case of Rea v. Paulson , the court found no undue influence because the party in the dominant position had insisted that the weaker party seek independent advice about deeding her house.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(45)
Showing 61 - 80 of 80
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)