Exam 19: Luke Maring and Tim Hsiao, “Guns”
Exam 1: Dustin Crummett and Chad McIntosh, “Introduction to the Left and Right”13 Questions
Exam 2: Dan Bonevac and Gillian Brock, “America First”13 Questions
Exam 3: Nicole Hassoun and Jason Brennan, “Foreign Aid”13 Questions
Exam 4: Peter Jaworski and Hrishikesh Joshi, “Immigration”13 Questions
Exam 5: I. G. and Saba Fatima, “Religious Tests”13 Questions
Exam 6: Bruno Verbeek and Michael Huemer, “Taxation”13 Questions
Exam 7: Mark Reiff and John Gaski, “Minimum Wage”13 Questions
Exam 8: Seth Mayer and Dan Shahar, “Environmental Regulation”13 Questions
Exam 9: Sam Fleishacker & Sherry Glied and Chris Freiman, “Right to Healthcare”13 Questions
Exam 10: Christopher Tollefsen and Nathan Nobis, “Abortion”13 Questions
Exam 11: Tully Borland and Megan Hyska, “Political Correctness”13 Questions
Exam 12: John Corvino and Ryan Anderson & Sherif Girgis, “Religious Exceptions”13 Questions
Exam 13: Loren Cannon and Vaughn Baltzly, “Bathroom Bills”13 Questions
Exam 14: Dan Lowe and Spencer Case, “Privilege”13 Questions
Exam 15: Philippe Lemoine and Rebecca Tuvel, “Feminism”13 Questions
Exam 16: Travis Timmerman and Dan Demetriou, “Removing Historic Monuments”13 Questions
Exam 17: Stephen Kershnar and Kristina Meshelski, “Affirmative Action”13 Questions
Exam 18: Annabelle Lever and Allan Hillman, “Racial Profiling”13 Questions
Exam 19: Luke Maring and Tim Hsiao, “Guns”13 Questions
Exam 20: Mark Zelcer and Jen Kling, “Military Spending”13 Questions
Exam 21: Michael LaBossiere and Patrick Taylor Smith, “Voting Ethics”13 Questions
Select questions type
In his essay, Maring affirms that guns advocates have developed two rights-based arguments that cited different entitlements. What do these advocates claim that they are entitled to use guns for?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
D
In his essay, Maring offers a series of alternative options to modifying the Second Amendment in order to secure mutual disarmament. Which of the following is one of the options he considers?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
C
In his essay, Hsiao presents an argument from what in favor of his position?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
Correct Answer:
A
In his reply, Maring outlines three questions we need to ask about the sources we encounter. Which of the following is NOT one of those questions?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
In his essay, Luke Maring offers an example of a parent taking money from her child's piggybank to illustrate a point about gun ownership. In your essay, explain Maring's piggybank example. Then, explain why someone might resist interpreting the state's role in citizens' lives in this way. Finally, consider how Maring might respond to the argument you propose.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(36)
In his reply, Hsiao argues that defensive gun use does not require what?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)
Identify the author who affirms the following in his essay: "Political conservatives sometimes criticize liberals for trusting the state-… conservatives are on this score exactly correct. The great insight of conservatism is that governments are not grand impartial arbiters dispassionately pursuing the common good."
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
In his essay, Tim Hsiao makes an argument from liberty. One of the benefits of this argument, in his view, is that "the defender of the argument from liberty does not have to show that guns are beneficial per se." In your essay, explain what Hsiao means by this. Then, offer an objection to his argument from liberty, and consider how Hsiao might reply.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(46)
In his essay, Hsiao affirms that we should think of an armed citizenry as _____ against government abuse.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
In his essay, Hsiao considers various potential social harms of gun ownership. Which of the following is NOT a harm that he considers?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(29)
In his reply, Luke Maring affirms that "Hsiao and I share important common ground: wariness of armed state forces." While they agree on this general point, they come to different conclusions as to how citizens ought to respond. In your essay, explain the nature of this disagreement, drawing from both of their works. Then try to convince your reader that one position, the other, or some alternative is most plausible.
(Essay)
4.7/5
(40)
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)