Exam 8: Things Fall Apart: Product Liability and Consumers

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

Should products designed for children be more strictly regulated than products for adults? Why or why not?

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(24)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Products designed for children should indeed be more strictly regulated than products for adults. This is because children are more vulnerable and less capable of understanding potential risks associated with products. Additionally, their smaller size and developing bodies make them more susceptible to harm from unsafe products.

Strict regulations for children's products can help ensure that they are safe, non-toxic, and age-appropriate. This can include requirements for choking hazard warnings, non-toxic materials, and age-appropriate design features.

On the other hand, products for adults are typically designed and marketed with the assumption that the user is capable of understanding and assessing potential risks. Adults also have more developed physical and cognitive abilities to handle and use products safely.

In conclusion, stricter regulations for children's products are necessary to protect their safety and well-being, while products for adults can be subject to less stringent regulations due to the assumption of user capability and understanding.

Ford was not aware of the danger posed by the Pinto's fuel tank.

Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
Verified

False

Who brought cost-benefit analysis to the government?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)
Correct Answer:
Verified

A

Which lawsuit(s) does Thomson NOT discuss?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(44)

Why does Dowie think that Ford's cost-benefit analysis is a moral problem?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(46)

Tort law and liability insurance "feed" one another, according to Modic.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(44)

Burger believes that professionals like lawyers should not advertise.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)

A tort refers to a type of __________ wrong.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(42)

Adam Thierer describes a problem the American tort system poses for the growth of driverless car technology, and the solution he proposes for that problem is based on a 1986 act concerning _________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(38)

In the case of Summers v. Tice, two quail hunters were found to be liable because they were __________________ toward Summers.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(37)

Sandra Gillespie's Pinto did what to cause such a major embarrassment and moral problem for Ford Motor Company?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)

People who have a very low tolerance of risk are called risk-_______________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(37)

We normally think that the person who __________ harm to another should be the one who is liable for it.

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(35)

Justice Burger believes that lawyers have changed over the years in what way?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)

Which of the following is not a potential challenge that the growth of driverless car technology faces, according to Adam Thierer?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)

Roy Anderson believes it is critical to understand that:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)

The leading cause of death for people between the ages of 16 and 24 is __________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)

In tort law, the concept that the guilty person must be 100 percent at fault is followed unquestioningly.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(40)

Thomson outlines three things a plaintiff must show in order to win his case. All of the following are discussed EXCEPT:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)

Ford's cost-benefit analysis valued a human life at approximately $200,000.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)
Showing 1 - 20 of 64
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)