Question 1

The latin maxim cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex means 'with the reason for the rule ceasing, the law itself no longer exists'.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False  True

Question 2

What was significant about the case of R v Faqir Mohammed?

Accepted Answer

A)  In this case, the JCPC overruled the previous House of Lords decision in Smith. 
B)  In this case, the Court of Appeal decided to follow the JCPC's decision in Jersey v Holley instead of the House of Lords decision in Smith, overcoming the strict rules of stare decisis. 
C)  The Court of Appeal decided not to follow its own previous decision in Jersey v Holley. 
D)  The House of Lords decided that Smith was the correct authority rather than the JCPC's decision in Jersey v Holley. 
A)  In this case, the JCPC overruled the previous House of Lords decision in Smith. 
B)  In this case, the Court of Appeal decided to follow the JCPC's decision in Jersey v Holley instead of the House of Lords decision in Smith, overcoming the strict rules of stare decisis. 
C)  The Court of Appeal decided not to follow its own previous decision in Jersey v Holley. 
D)  The House of Lords decided that Smith was the correct authority rather than the JCPC's decision in Jersey v Holley. B

Question 3

When is the Court of Appeal not bound by its own previous decisions (select all that apply)?

Accepted Answer

A)  When there are two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions. 
B)  When the House of Lords/Supreme Court has expressly or impliedly overruled the Court of Appeal's reasoning. 
C)  When the previous decision has been made per incuriam. 
D)  When the Court of Appeal has expressly chosen not to follow an earlier House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision. 
A)  When there are two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions. 
B)  When the House of Lords/Supreme Court has expressly or impliedly overruled the Court of Appeal's reasoning. 
C)  When the previous decision has been made per incuriam. 
D)  When the Court of Appeal has expressly chosen not to follow an earlier House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision. A, B, C, D

Question 4

Which of the following statements is illustrated by the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Household Fire Insurance Co v Grant?

Accepted Answer

A)  Judges may use the same authority to come to different conclusions. 
B)  Judges using the same authority must come to the same conclusion. 
C)  The Court of Appeal was not bound by Dunlop v Higgins because it was decided by a lower court. 
D)  Precedent is fixed so judges cannot decide to interpret it individually. 
A)  Judges may use the same authority to come to different conclusions. 
B)  Judges using the same authority must come to the same conclusion. 
C)  The Court of Appeal was not bound by Dunlop v Higgins because it was decided by a lower court. 
D)  Precedent is fixed so judges cannot decide to interpret it individually.

Question 5

Case 1: A man is walking his dog in the park. The dog bites a passing toddler, who has done nothing to provoke the dog. The man is held liable in negligence.
Case 2: A woman's cat bites a teenager who was pulling its tail.
Which of the following would the judge in case 2 need to consider in deciding whether case 1 should be applied (select all that apply)?

Accepted Answer

A)  Whether the principle of liability is applicable to dogs only or can include cats. 
B)  Whether the fact that it was a toddler who was bitten gave rise to liability in case 1 and so excludes cases relating to teenagers. 
C)  Whether it is significant that the attack on the toddler was unprovoked because the attack on the teenager was provoked. 
D)  Whether the cat in question was a Siamese or a tabby. 
A)  Whether the principle of liability is applicable to dogs only or can include cats. 
B)  Whether the fact that it was a toddler who was bitten gave rise to liability in case 1 and so excludes cases relating to teenagers. 
C)  Whether it is significant that the attack on the toddler was unprovoked because the attack on the teenager was provoked. 
D)  Whether the cat in question was a Siamese or a tabby.

Question 6

In practice, the principle of stare decisis means that all courts of equal or lower status to the court making the decision will be bound by that decision if the two cases are similar.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 7

Decisions of the House of Lords/Supreme Court are binding upon all courts including the Supreme Court itself.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 8

When can the Court of Appeal decide not to follow a decision made by the House of Lords/Supreme Court?

Accepted Answer

A)  When the House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision was made per incuriam. 
B)  When cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex. 
C)  When the House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision is clearly wrong, and both the reasoning and the decision should be departed from. 
D)  Never. 
E)  When the rules set out by the 1966 Practice Statement apply. 
A)  When the House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision was made per incuriam. 
B)  When cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex. 
C)  When the House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision is clearly wrong, and both the reasoning and the decision should be departed from. 
D)  Never. 
E)  When the rules set out by the 1966 Practice Statement apply.

Question 9

'Case law' is the term used by common lawyers to describe the collection of legal principles emanating from all of the reported cases on a given topic.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 10

What does the latin phrase stare decisis literally translate as?

Accepted Answer

A)  Let the decision stay. 
B)  Let the decision stand. 
C)  The ratio is decisive. 
D)  Stay decided. 
A)  Let the decision stay. 
B)  Let the decision stand. 
C)  The ratio is decisive. 
D)  Stay decided.

Question 11

Retrospective overruling means that the ruling catches the parties to the case, and any other cases coming before the court, even if events occurred before the decision was given. Prospective overruling means that only events occurring after the ruling are caught by it.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 12

Complete the following (select all that apply): per incuriam…

Accepted Answer

A)  is a rule that allows the Court of Appeal not to follow a previous House of Lords/Supreme Court decision. 
B)  means that a court failed to consider all the relevant and vital statutes or case authorities and this had a major effect on its decision. 
C)  cannot be used by the Court of Appeal as a reason not to follow a previous House of Lords/Supreme Court decision. 
D)  was a rule invented by Lord Denning and died with him. 
A)  is a rule that allows the Court of Appeal not to follow a previous House of Lords/Supreme Court decision. 
B)  means that a court failed to consider all the relevant and vital statutes or case authorities and this had a major effect on its decision. 
C)  cannot be used by the Court of Appeal as a reason not to follow a previous House of Lords/Supreme Court decision. 
D)  was a rule invented by Lord Denning and died with him.

Question 13

Which of the following would not be sufficient reason to date for the Supreme Court to overturn its own previous decision?

Accepted Answer

A)  Public policy suggests that the decision should be overturned. 
B)  The review would affect the resolution of the actual case. 
C)  The earlier decision was wrong. 
D)  The outcome was wrong but the reasoning was correct 
A)  Public policy suggests that the decision should be overturned. 
B)  The review would affect the resolution of the actual case. 
C)  The earlier decision was wrong. 
D)  The outcome was wrong but the reasoning was correct

Question 14

The 'leapfrogging' procedure is where criminal cases go on appeal from the High Court directly to the House of Lords.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 15

Which of the following are not persuasive precedents?

Accepted Answer

A)  Decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. 
B)  Decisions of the Scottish and Northern Irish courts. 
C)  Decisions of courts of lower status. 
D)  A decision of the Court of Appeal (when considered by the High Court). 
A)  Decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. 
B)  Decisions of the Scottish and Northern Irish courts. 
C)  Decisions of courts of lower status. 
D)  A decision of the Court of Appeal (when considered by the High Court).

The latin maxim cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex means 'with the reason for the rule ceasing, the law itself no longer exists'.

What was significant about the case of R v Faqir Mohammed?

When is the Court of Appeal not bound by its own previous decisions (select all that apply)?

Which of the following statements is illustrated by the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Household Fire Insurance Co v Grant?

In practice, the principle of stare decisis means that all courts of equal or lower status to the court making the decision will be bound by that decision if the two cases are similar.

Decisions of the House of Lords/Supreme Court are binding upon all courts including the Supreme Court itself.

When can the Court of Appeal decide not to follow a decision made by the House of Lords/Supreme Court?

'Case law' is the term used by common lawyers to describe the collection of legal principles emanating from all of the reported cases on a given topic.

What does the latin phrase stare decisis literally translate as?

Retrospective overruling means that the ruling catches the parties to the case, and any other cases coming before the court, even if events occurred before the decision was given. Prospective overruling means that only events occurring after the ruling are caught by it.

Complete the following (select all that apply): per incuriam…

Which of the following would not be sufficient reason to date for the Supreme Court to overturn its own previous decision?

The 'leapfrogging' procedure is where criminal cases go on appeal from the High Court directly to the House of Lords.

Which of the following are not persuasive precedents?

Understanding the Law

Finding the Law

Reading the Law

From Reading to Writing

The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

How Precedent Operates: Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dictum

Making Sense of Statutes

Interpreting Statutes

Bringing Rights Home: Legal Method and Convention Rights

European Legal Method

Filters

Exam 5: Constructing the Legal Argument

The latin maxim cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex means 'with the reason for the rule ceasing, the law itself no longer exists'.

What was significant about the case of R v Faqir Mohammed?

When is the Court of Appeal not bound by its own previous decisions (select all that apply)?

Which of the following statements is illustrated by the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Household Fire Insurance Co v Grant?

In practice, the principle of stare decisis means that all courts of equal or lower status to the court making the decision will be bound by that decision if the two cases are similar.

Decisions of the House of Lords/Supreme Court are binding upon all courts including the Supreme Court itself.

When can the Court of Appeal decide not to follow a decision made by the House of Lords/Supreme Court?

'Case law' is the term used by common lawyers to describe the collection of legal principles emanating from all of the reported cases on a given topic.

What does the latin phrase stare decisis literally translate as?

Retrospective overruling means that the ruling catches the parties to the case, and any other cases coming before the court, even if events occurred before the decision was given. Prospective overruling means that only events occurring after the ruling are caught by it.

Complete the following (select all that apply): per incuriam…

Which of the following would not be sufficient reason to date for the Supreme Court to overturn its own previous decision?

The 'leapfrogging' procedure is where criminal cases go on appeal from the High Court directly to the House of Lords.

Which of the following are not persuasive precedents?

Understanding the Law

Finding the Law

Reading the Law

From Reading to Writing

The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

How Precedent Operates: Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dictum

Making Sense of Statutes

Interpreting Statutes

Bringing Rights Home: Legal Method and Convention Rights

European Legal Method

Filters