Exam 1: Logic
"The world is nothing but your private dream." How would you argue against (or for) this claim?
The claim that "the world is nothing but your private dream" is a philosophical statement that suggests that the world and everything in it is merely a creation of our own minds. This claim can be argued against by considering the existence of objective reality and the experiences of others.
Firstly, the existence of an objective reality can be observed through scientific evidence and the consensus of multiple individuals experiencing the same events. For example, the laws of physics, biology, and other scientific principles are consistent across different people's experiences, suggesting that there is a reality that exists independently of our individual perceptions.
Additionally, the experiences and perspectives of others also challenge the idea that the world is solely a private dream. Other people have their own thoughts, feelings, and experiences that are independent of our own. Their existence and the interactions we have with them further support the idea that there is a shared reality beyond our individual perceptions.
On the other hand, one could argue for the claim by pointing to the subjective nature of perception and the influence of our thoughts and beliefs on our experiences. From a philosophical standpoint, it can be argued that our perceptions shape our reality, and therefore, the world is indeed a reflection of our private dreams.
In conclusion, while the claim that "the world is nothing but your private dream" may have some philosophical merit, it can be argued against by considering the existence of an objective reality and the experiences of others. Ultimately, the debate over the nature of reality and perception is a complex and ongoing philosophical discussion.
"Since my sister has liked all the friends I've brought home so far, I imagine she will like my new friend, Ted, as well." This statement is most clearly an example of
B
With a valid deductive argument we know that
D
Think of some problem you tried to solve recently (finding something, fixing something, whatever).
a. Describe the reasoning process you went through.
b. Explain how your reasoning was inductive or deductive or some combination of both.
Reasoning that someone is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" would be an example of what type of reasoning?
"Deduction goes from the general to the particular; induction goes from the particular to the general." Explain why this statement is wrong and give examples to support your point. Give your own characterization of the difference between deduction and induction.
All human beings observed thus far have lived less than 20 years.
--------------
The next human being observed will live less than 20 years.
The above argument is an example of
"Of course I can't tell you what would disprove my hypothesis. After all, my hypothesis is true." What's wrong with this statement? Explain.
If this is 2094, then it is the twenty-first century
It is 2094
--------------
It is the twenty-first century
The above argument is:
"Look before you leap, my friend. And remember, he who hesitates is lost." This statement exemplifies the fallacy of
"People seem to like what John has to say. I'd believe him if I were you." This statement involves what fallacy?
"This scientific theory is so solid that you can't even imagine it being false." This statement would likely be an example of the fallacy of
The following argument is valid: "We live on Mars; therefore, we live on Mars."
"Either it's going to rain tomorrow or it isn't." This argument is best symbolized as
If p, then q
Not p
--------------
Not q
The above argument is an example of the fallacy of
Either moral questions are like scientific questions or they're like questions of taste.
It's not the case that moral questions are like scientific questions.
--------------
Moral questions are like questions of taste.
Symbolize the above argument and say whether it is valid or invalid. If it has a name, what is it?
"We'll get him a fair trial and then hang him." This statement would likely be an example of the fallacy of
"Don't believe what Professor Ingram says in his physics class. I hear he cheats on his wife." This would be an example of
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)