Exam 22: Warranties And Product Liability

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Even though a car has an obvious dent in the rear quarter panel,the salesperson tells a potential customer,"This car has never been in an accident." The salesperson's statement creates a valid express warranty.

Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(27)
Correct Answer:
Verified

False

Crytrin Manufacturing,Inc.contracted with Molfrey,Inc.to manufacture three large pieces of equipment.The contract contained a clause stating that Crytrin agreed to repair or replace any defective equipment,but that was the only remedy Molfry would have.This clause:

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
Verified

C

The plaintiff,Donald Laird has a bachelor of science degree in animal science,had previously been employed at the university's swine research center,had managed a feed mill,had been employed as a herdsman for Hog Breeders,Incorporated,had worked for five years for Armour & Company at its feeder pig operations,and was a branch manager of the Scribner Co-op,Inc.for 14 years.Laird's assistant manager while at the Co-op was Gary Ruwe.When Laird quit the Co-op,Ruwe became the manager.Later,Laird went to Co-op to purchase some feed ingredients for his hogs.In speaking with Ruwe,Laird learned that the Co-op grain bin was not operating properly and therefore the corn was not drying properly.If the corn does not dry properly,it can collect mold and insects.Laird said he would take 1300 bushels of corn if Ruwe could pull the corn out of the middle of the grain bin.The corn was delivered to Laird where he noticed some damaged corn and an odor that indicated that the corn may have mold.Laird did not reject the shipment,however.Laird then began to feed the corn to his hogs.The boars began to develop pneumonia,began vomiting,and would not eat regularly.When it was time for the sows to farrow,the sows had an abnormally high number of miscarriages and stillborns.The ultimate conclusion was that the corn delivered was tainted with vomitoxins,a toxic substance that made the corn unmarketable as feed.Laird sued the Co-op for breach of the implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose and merchantability.In order to recover under the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose what does Laird have to prove? What is the implied warranty of merchantability? Does Laird have a successful claim with this warranty?

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
Verified

This case is governed by the UCC because the sale of corn stored in a grain bin is the sale of goods.The UCC contemplates two implied warranties of quality with the sales of goods.Laird first alleged a breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.The Code 2-315 states that "where the seller at the time of contracting knows about a particular purpose for which the buyer wants the goods,and knows that the buyer is relying on the seller's skill or judgment,there is (unless disclaimed)an implied warranty that the goods shall be fit for such purpose." Here Laird must show that 1)the Co-op had reason to know of Laird's particular purpose in buying the corn; 2)Co-op had reason to know that Laird was relying on Co-op's skill or judgment to furnish appropriate goods,and 3)Laird,in fact,relied upon Co-op's skill or judgment.The court concluded that Laird was a sophisticated buyer.He in fact was the person who trained Ruwe,Co-op's present manager.Therefore,Laird did not rely on Co-op's skill and knowledge to choose this particular type of corn.Next,consider the implied warranty of merchantability.UCC Section 2-314(1)states,"Unless excluded or modified,a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable (fit for their normal purposes)is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind." Clearly the Co-op is a merchant with respect to the buying and selling of corn.The corn was established by the University of Nebraska to be unmarketable.The Co-op was liable for the breach of this warranty.

The economic loss doctrine states that,when the injured party is a corporation and the harm is purely economic,the only remedies available are those under the common law.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(28)

Under the UCC,no warranty of title arises unless the contract is in writing.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(25)

A merchant seller who would like to exclude the warranty of merchantability can do so by doing which of the following?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)

Myrtle walks into Hank's Hardware Store and says,"I need metal storage shelves that can hold 500 pounds." Hank directs her to a metal storage shelving system,which Myrtle buys.When Myrtle puts 475 pounds of weight on the shelves,they collapse.Hank's Hardware breached the warranty of merchantability.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)

Alice's Aspirin Inc.,produces and packages aspirin for sale to retail stores.Bob buys a bottle of Alice's aspirin at Dahl's Food Stores.Two days later Bob's friend,Hank,takes two aspirin while at Bob's house.Within minutes,Hank is very ill and is rushed to the hospital,where it is found that a defect in the aspirin caused the reaction.Which of the following is correct?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)

Peter purchased a new car from Monster Motors.As he drove away from the dealership in the new car,the steering mechanism failed.Peter lost control of the car and plunged down an embankment.Peter was seriously injured.If Peter sues the car manufacturer under strict liability,what does he have to prove? Will Peter be successful?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(32)

Many states prohibit a seller from disclaiming implied warranties in the sale of consumer goods.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(27)

The UCC requires sellers to give written warranties.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(33)

Van is using his wrench as a hammer when the wrench breaks and a piece flies off,injuring his neighbor who is helping Van change a tire on Van's car.If Van sues the tool manufacturer,its best defense will be:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)

In order to disclaim a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose,a merchant:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)

How do the tort theories of negligent product liability and strict product liability differ from each other? List and describe the elements an injured party must establish for recovery under each cause of action.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(39)

Which of the following statements could create an express warranty?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(42)

Bill is injured while standing on the corner of Hollyhock and Vine when Mia's new Hog speeds out of control because of a defective part.In most jurisdictions,Bill:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(43)

The statute of limitations for breach of warranty under the UCC is?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)

A product liability case may be brought in warranty,negligence,or strict liability,but it must have the element that a person or business has been hurt by goods.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(31)

Which of the following is not guaranteed under an implied warranty?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)

Which of the following would be a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
Showing 1 - 20 of 46
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)