Exam 3: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

States do not have exclusive jurisdiction on any matter.​

(True/False)
4.7/5
(37)

Sour Dough Inc. and The Bread Company, agree to a contract that includes an arbitration clause. If a dispute arises, a court having jurisdiction may​

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

Early neutral case evaluation refers to the resolution of a case before the dispute becomes contentious, when the parties' positions are said to be "neutral."​

(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)

Small claims courts are inferior trial courts.​

(True/False)
4.8/5
(35)

Service Employees International Union and Timberline Products, Inc., have their dispute resolved in arbitration. The arbitrator arbitrates issues that the parties did not agree to submit to arbitration. This is a ground for a court to​

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)

Some cases decided by federal courts of appeals are not subject to review by the United States Supreme Court.​

(True/False)
4.7/5
(37)

D'Antoni files a suit in a federal district court against Enya. D'Antoni loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and loses again. D'Antoni asks the United States Supreme Court to hear the case. The Court is​

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

Sforza files a suit against Thieu. If this suit is like most cases, it will be​

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)

Quest Inc., a U.S. firm, and Real Treks, Ltd., a Canadian firm, enter into a contract that does not have a forum-selection or choice-of-law clause. Litigation between Quest and Real Treks involving this contract may occur in​

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)

Tyler, a citizen of Utah, files a suit in a Utah state court against Virtual Sales Corporation, a Washington state company that does business in Utah. The court has original jurisdiction, which means that​

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

Hope wants to file a suit against Gerry. For a court to hear the case,​

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(39)

The case of Max v. National Credit Co. is heard in a trial court. The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co. v. Pecan Corp. is heard in an appellate court. The difference between a trial and an appellate court is whether​

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(44)

Most online dispute resolution services apply international principles promulgated by the United Nations to resolve disputes.​

(True/False)
4.8/5
(41)

Litigation is the process of resolving a dispute through the court system.​

(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)

All Bikes, Inc., a firm in Wisconsin, advertises on the Web. A court in Ohio would be most likely to exercise jurisdiction over All Bikes if the firm​

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

Norwest Trucking Corporation files a suit in a state court against Bob's Service Company (BSC), and wins. BSC appeals the court's decision, asserting that the evidence presented at trial to support Norwest's claim was so scanty that no reasonable jury could have found for the plaintiff. Therefore, argues BSC, the appellate court should reverse the trial court's decision. Is the appellate court likely to reverse the trial court's findings with respect to the facts? If not, why not? What are an appellate court's options after reviewing a case?​

(Essay)
4.7/5
(38)

Generally, a foreign court's decision can be enforced in the United States.​

(True/False)
4.8/5
(44)

Minimum contacts with a jurisdiction are never enough to support jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant.​

(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)

For jurisdictional purposes, corporations are considered legal persons.​

(True/False)
4.7/5
(38)

Hua, a resident of Illinois, owns a warehouse in Indiana. A dispute arises over the ownership of the warehouse with Jac, a resident of Kentucky. Jac files a suit against Hua in Indiana. Regarding this suit, Indiana has​

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
Showing 21 - 40 of 72
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)