Exam 5: Where Can We Look to Explain Verbal Misunderstandings
What are the four maxims that Grice proposed for verbal communication?
The four maxims proposed by the philosopher H.P. Grice for effective verbal communication are part of his Cooperative Principle, which is a cornerstone in the study of pragmatics. These maxims are intended to explain how people typically communicate with one another and are meant to be guidelines that speakers generally follow to communicate clearly and effectively. The four maxims are:
1. Maxim of Quantity: This maxim suggests that one should be as informative as one possibly can, and give as much information as is needed, and no more. The information provided should be neither too little nor excessively detailed.
2. Maxim of Quality: This maxim emphasizes the importance of truthfulness and reliability. It suggests that one should not communicate what one believes to be false or that for which one lacks adequate evidence. In other words, do not say what you believe to be false or that for which you lack evidence.
3. Maxim of Relation: Also known as the Maxim of Relevance, this principle states that contributions to a conversation should be relevant to the topic at hand. This means that speakers should make comments that are pertinent to the current discussion and avoid off-topic remarks that could derail the conversation.
4. Maxim of Manner: This maxim involves being clear, brief, and orderly in communication and avoiding obscurity and ambiguity. It suggests that one should avoid being overly wordy or disorganized and should strive for clarity and straightforwardness in their speech.
Grice proposed that when these maxims are flouted (intentionally or unintentionally), it can lead to misunderstandings, confusion, or the generation of implicatures, which are meanings that are implied rather than explicitly stated. The Cooperative Principle and its maxims are foundational concepts in the study of communication and are used to analyze and understand conversational interactions.
The pronouns tú and usted reflect different interpersonal relationships.
True
Briefly explain the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Do you agree or disagree with it? Why?
What had the Canadian, Fred, done to create a negative reaction among the Japanese
Teachers he wished to join?
Short segments of talk do things, such as praise, complain, invite are called ____________.
The language we use makes a difference in how we perceive the world.
Key terms refers to terms that are universal in their meaning. 19. The pronouns tú and usted reflect different interpersonal relationships.
Why are idioms difficult in intercultural communication? Give an example.
A statement that is not strictly true, but still conveys a community understood meaning is called a(n) _________.
A form of talk that is not strictly true, but is still understood as an appropriate statement within a particular community is a(n):
Explain what is meant by honorifics and give an example within your own community?
Cultural misunderstandings that derive from different expectations about what kinds of speech are appropriate in different settings violate the ____________ maxim.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)