Exam 8: Immigration
Exam 1: Coral Reefs10 Questions
Exam 1: Coral Reefs, DOMA, and Electoral College6 Questions
Exam 2: English4 Questions
Exam 2: Doma10 Questions
Exam 3: Galician5 Questions
Exam 3: Electoral College10 Questions
Exam 4: GPS10 Questions
Exam 4: English Tests10 Questions
Exam 5: Galician10 Questions
Exam 5: History of Food10 Questions
Exam 6: Gps10 Questions
Exam 6: Immigration10 Questions
Exam 7: History of Food10 Questions
Exam 7: Mandarin10 Questions
Exam 8: Marianas Trench10 Questions
Exam 8: Immigration10 Questions
Exam 9: Mandarin10 Questions
Exam 9: Spanish in USA5 Questions
Exam 10: Tomato Fights5 Questions
Exam 10: Marianas Trench10 Questions
Exam 11: US Congress5 Questions
Exam 11: Noaa10 Questions
Exam 12: Vowel Shift7 Questions
Exam 12: Spanish in Usa10 Questions
Exam 13: Tomato Fights10 Questions
Exam 14: Us Congress10 Questions
Exam 15: Vowel Shift10 Questions
Exam 16: Tofel English Test Study Questions46 Questions
Select questions type
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
According to the passage, all of the following statements are false EXCEPT:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(43)
Correct Answer:
C
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
The word "controversy", bolded after the (3) in paragraph 2, can best be defined as
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Correct Answer:
A
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
Which of the following is false according to the passage?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
C
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
Which of following is true according to the passage?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
The word "alien", bolded after the (2) in paragraph 1, can best be described as
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
The word "ban", bolded after the (4) in the second paragraph, is closest in meaning to
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(26)
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
According to the passage, why do opponents of Arizona SB 1070 want to have the law banned?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
Based on the information in the passage, which of the following could be a synonym of the term "provoked", bolded after the (5) in the third paragraph?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(44)
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
The word "legislation", bolded after the (1) in the first paragraph, is close in meaning to ALL of the following words EXCEPT
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Immigration Laws in the U.S. The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" is a law that was introduced in the state of Arizona in 2010. This law is similar to the existing federal (1) legislation that requires all aliens, or U.S. non-citizens, over 14 years old, who stay in the U.S. for more than 30 days, to register with the U.S. government. An (2) alien must also carry his/her registration documents with him/her at all times. In addition to the existing federal law, Arizona made it a requirement that its state's law enforcement officers make an attempt to identify an individual's immigration status during detention, arrest, or a "lawful contact". The term "lawful contact" refers to an officer's obligation to approach someone that he or she believes is an illegal immigrant.
The "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act", also known as Arizona Senate Bill (SB) 1070, has caused national and international (3) controversy on the topic of immigration, and especially illegal immigration from south of the U.S. border. Opponents believe that the law forces officers to racially profile people, or judge them based on whether or not they look Latino. Challengers of this law want to (4) ban it, because they believe it forces policemen and policewomen to racially discriminate against people who are not from a European or African background. However, advocates of the law deny that it allows the use of race as the exclusive basis for investigating immigration status.
The law has since been modified with the goal of addressing some of the concerns of the opponents. However, despite the protests in opposition to the law from around the country, polling has shown that there is an overall support for the law in Arizona and in other states. And passage of the modified version of the law has (5) provoked other states to consider implementing similar immigration laws.
According to the author, which of the following was not an opinion of the challengers of SB 1070?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(47)
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)