Exam 7: Technical Briefings

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The essential differences between artistic and inartistic proofs lie in their sources and the way they are used to persuade an audience.

Artistic proofs are those that come from the speaker or writer themselves, and they are based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos refers to the credibility and trustworthiness of the speaker, pathos appeals to the emotions of the audience, and logos relies on logical reasoning and evidence. These proofs are considered artistic because they are created and crafted by the speaker to effectively persuade the audience. For example, a politician giving a speech may use their personal experiences, emotional appeals, and logical arguments to convince the audience to support their policies.

On the other hand, inartistic proofs are those that come from sources outside of the speaker's control, such as laws, witnesses, contracts, and other forms of evidence. These proofs are considered inartistic because they are not created by the speaker, but rather exist independently of them. For example, in a court case, the testimony of a witness or the presentation of physical evidence like DNA or fingerprints would be considered inartistic proofs.

The use of these proofs also differs in that artistic proofs are more flexible and can be tailored to the specific audience and context, while inartistic proofs are more fixed and objective. Additionally, artistic proofs are often used to establish the speaker's credibility and emotional connection with the audience, while inartistic proofs are used to provide concrete evidence and support for the speaker's arguments.

In conclusion, the essential differences between artistic and inartistic proofs lie in their sources, the way they are used, and their flexibility. Understanding these differences is crucial for effectively crafting persuasive arguments and engaging with different audiences.