Exam 6: Elements of Torts
Exam 1: Todays Business Environment: Law and Ethics327 Questions
Exam 2: The Court Systems431 Questions
Exam 3: Trials and Resolving Disputes509 Questions
Exam 4: The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business445 Questions
Exam 5: Criminal Law and Business321 Questions
Exam 6: Elements of Torts465 Questions
Exam 7: Business Torts and Product Liability361 Questions
Exam 8: Real and Personal Property287 Questions
Exam 9: Intellectual Property407 Questions
Exam 10: Contracts584 Questions
Exam 11: Domestic and International Sales424 Questions
Exam 12: Business Organizations459 Questions
Exam 13: Negotiable Instruments, Credit, and Bankruptcy535 Questions
Exam 14: Agency and the Employment Relationship416 Questions
Exam 15: Employment and Labor Regulations539 Questions
Exam 16: Employment Discrimination466 Questions
Exam 17: The Regulatory Process349 Questions
Exam 18: Securities Regulation449 Questions
Exam 19: Consumer Protection483 Questions
Exam 20: Antitrust Law439 Questions
Exam 21: Environmental Law498 Questions
Exam 22: The International Legal Environment of Business338 Questions
Select questions type
The sine qua non rule is also known as the:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(42)
Correct Answer:
C
Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime may be defamation per se.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
True
In Lawler v. Montblanc North America, where Lawler, a store manager, was fired after telling her employer that she could not work more than 20 hours a week due to a medical condition. She sued for emotional distress but lost at trial. For the appeals court to reverse the district court's judgment for the defendant it held that Lawler would have had to show that:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
E
If someone comes up behind you and hits you on the head with a brick, you would sue them for the intentional tort of assault.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(38)
Jill publicly states that Alvin committed a murder. Jill's statement is considered:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Negligence in tort may be imposed only if a party acted improperly. A failure to act cannot itself lead to a tort.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(27)
Tort law is intended to try to put an injured party in the position he would have been in if the tort had not occurred.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(28)
Assume that Karen walks up to you and slaps you in the face. You slap her back. She sues you for battery. In this case, you:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)
The doctrine of comparative negligence permits damages to be:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)
If an accounting firm is sued for negligently preparing a faulty financial report for a company, it is likely that the accounting firm is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)
While Mrs. O'Leary may have been negligent in leaving an oil lamp in the barn for her cow to kick over, she would not be held liable for the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 because the chain of events from the cow kicking the lantern to the destruction of the city was not:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)
In one case, a man who was drunk wanted to recover money another man owed him. He pulled a gun and, in the course of a struggle, accidentally shot the man who owed the money. The man who was shot sued for battery. A court is likely to hold that the man with the gun:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
Contact that does not cause actual physical harm, but offends a reasonable person's sense of dignity could be a tort of:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
If Sam points a gun at Harry, a stranger, and says "Prepare to die," but then does nothing, the tort possibly committed is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
In Fuerschbach v. Southwest Airlines, where Fuerschbach was "arrested" at work as part of a prank, the appeals court held that the police may be liable for a battery for pretending to arrest her.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(27)
Showing 1 - 20 of 465
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)