Exam 3: The Role and Documentation of Evidence in Criminal Investigations
Exam 1: The Investigation of Crime38 Questions
Exam 2: The History of Criminal Investigation40 Questions
Exam 3: The Role and Documentation of Evidence in Criminal Investigations40 Questions
Exam 4: The Law and Criminal Investigations42 Questions
Exam 5: Physical Evidence and the Crime Scene43 Questions
Exam 6: Interviews and Eyewitness Identifications41 Questions
Exam 7: Interrogations and Confessions40 Questions
Exam 8: Behavioral Evidence and Crime Analysis40 Questions
Exam 9: Information From the Public, Social Media, Information Networks, Digital Devices, and Other Sources40 Questions
Exam 10: Death Investigation43 Questions
Exam 11: The Investigation of Sex Crimes, Assault, Child Abuse, and Related Offenses40 Questions
Exam 12: The Investigation of Robbery42 Questions
Exam 13: The Investigation of Burglary, Vehicle Theft, Arson, and Other Property Crimes42 Questions
Exam 14: The Investigation of Fraud and Computer-Related Crimes41 Questions
Exam 15: The Presentation of Evidence41 Questions
Exam 16: Terrorism, Technology, and the Future of Criminal Investigation42 Questions
Select questions type
The legal question what would a reasonable person have thought or done under these circumstances relates to ______.
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(42)
Correct Answer:
D
Reasonable suspicion applies to ______.
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
B
All direct evidence is in the form of eyewitness testimony.
Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
False
Investigator perceptions and interpretations of body language may not be admissible in court; therefore, they are basically worthless as evidence.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(25)
Compare inculpatory evidence with exculpatory evidence. Give an example of each.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(38)
Facts concerning the defendant's attempts to avoid apprehension, possession of the fruits of the crime, and ability and motive to commit the crime ______.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
A statement of a fifth witness that provides the same details as four other witnesses is an example of ______.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(35)
A defendant can be convicted of a crime with circumstantial evidence alone.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)
Circumstantial evidence is not necessarily less valuable than direct evidence in establishing proof.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
A defendant's previous admission or confession may be admitted into court as hearsay.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(40)
Which of the following is NOT an exception to the hearsay rule?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(38)
What supports the medical examiner's statement that Stanley was most likely killed on May 15 or May 16 and not on May 17 when the body was found?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
Crime-related information in which inferences and probabilities are needed in order to draw an associated conclusion is ______.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
The standard of proof needed in trial in order to conclude that a defendant is guilty of a crime is ______.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Which was NOT inculpatory evidence which led to Amy Van Wagner as the killer of her husband?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Evidence that is presented in court through witnesses speaking under oath is ______.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
Physicians, therapists, and forensic science technicians can all be possible expert witnesses
(True/False)
4.7/5
(32)
An eyewitness saw the defendant put poison in the victim's food. The eyewitness statement about this observation is ______ that the defendant put poison in the victim's food.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
Showing 1 - 20 of 40
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)