Exam 5: Resources and Trade: the Heckscher-Ohlin Model
Countries do not in fact export the goods the H.O. theory predicts. Discuss.
This statement is not true. Although one may find many cases where it seems to be true (e.g., the Leontief Paradox), all one needs to do in order to render the above statement not (generally) true is to find one counter example. In fact, one can find large subsets of agricultural and commodity products in which the H.O predictions are generally fulfilled. Labor-intensive countries such as Bangladesh do in fact export relatively labor-intensive goods. Capital-intensive countries such as Germany do in fact export capital-intensive products (at least to South countries). Countries such as Costa Rica ("sunshine abundant") tend to export bananas (sunshine-intensive products). The U.S. (a wheat-land-abundant country) does indeed export wheat (a wheat-land intensive product). In fact, since the early 1980s, the Leontief Paradox was not found to describe the U.S. trade data (hence ratifying the H.O. theory).
If trade opens up between the two formerly autarkic countries, Australia and Belgium, then
E
If Australia has more land per worker, and Belgium has more capital per worker,then if trade began between these two countries
C
Why do you suppose that South-South trade does NOT conform in volume, but does conform in pattern with expectations generated by the Heckscher-Ohlin model?
The assumption of diminishing returns in the Heckscher-Ohlin model means that, unlike in the Ricardian model, it is likely that
If Japan is relatively capital rich and the United States is relatively land rich, and if food is relatively land intensive then trade between these two, formerly autarkic countries will result in
Factor-intensity reversals describe a situation in which the production of a product may be land intensive in one country, and relatively labor intensive in another (at given relative wage levels). For example, cotton may be land intensive in the U.S., and labor intensive in Egypt where land is relatively scarce and expensive. Suppose factor-intensity reversals were common. How would that affect the conclusion that a country in which land is relatively scarce will not be the country with a comparative advantage in the land-intensive product?
If the price of the capital -intensive product rises more than does the price of the land- intensive product, then
The Heckscher-Ohlin model is famous for being elegant and mathematically sophisticated, yet failing to describe reality. One manifestation of this fact is Trefler's Case of Missing Trade. Explain what exactly is missing. In what sense is it missing?
How would you explain why it is missing?
How can a relaxation of the identical production functions explain the case of the missing trade?
How did the results obtained by Davis and Weinstein strengthen support for the validity of the HO model?
According to the Heckscher-Ohlin model, the source of comparative advantage is a country's
In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, when there is international-trade equilibrium
Empirical observations on actual North-South trade patterns tend to
Which of the following empirical studies cast the most doubt on the Heckscher-Ohlin model?
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of ________ will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the ________ good.
One of the commonly used assumptions in deriving the Heckscher-Ohlin model is that tastes are homothetic, or that if the per capita incomes were the same in two countries, the proportions of their expenditures allocated to each product would be the same as it is in the other country. Imagine that this assumption is false, and that in fact, the tastes in each country are strongly biased in favor of the product in which it has a comparative advantage. How would this affect the relationship between relative factor abundance between the two countries, and the nature (factor-intensity) of the product each exports?
What if the taste bias favored the imported good?
Suppose that there are two factors, capital and land, and that the United States is relatively land endowed while the European Union is relatively capital-endowed. According to the Heckscher-Ohlin model
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)