Exam 5: Product Liability
A manufacturing defect is a departure from a product unit's design specifications that results in products that are physically flawed.
True
Grass Green Company makes and sells hedge trimmers, which are designed to be safe if used properly. Hazel buys a Grass Green trimmer and lends it to her neighbor Izak. In his garage, Izak is using the trimmer as a prod to dislodge a box from a high shelf when the trimmer suddenly engages. Startled, Izak drops the trimmer, which swings around and cuts his leg. Izak files a product liability suit against Grass Green, on the ground of negligence. On what basis could the manufacturer prevail?
A manufacturer or seller can prevail in a product liability suit based on negligence if the manufacturer designed its product to be safe for proper uses, even if the product was not designed to be safe for un-foreseeable, improper uses, such as the use in this question.
A manu-fac-turer is negligent if it breaches the duty to exercise reasonable care in the design or manufacture of its product, or warnings about the prod-uct, and this breach causes injuries. In other words, liability may be found if a product is unsafe because of negligence in its manufacture, as-sembly, testing, or inspection. Even if all reasonable care is taken, the manufac-turer may be liable if the design of the product makes it unrea-sonably dangerous for the uses for which the product is made. A manu-facturer must also be liable for failing to include a warning if the manufacturer knows the product is dangerous when used as intended or as could reasonably be foreseen, and users are not likely to be aware of the danger.
But a manufac-turer has no li-ability, when its product is reasonably safe for proper uses and foreseeable, improper uses, and is used in an unforesee-able, improper way.
Forest & Field Company makes and leases a backhoe to Gallagher. Due to a defect attributable to Forest & Field's negligence, Gallagher is injured in an accident in which his neighbor Helga is also hurt. In a product liability suit based on negligence, Forest & Field may be liable to
C
The types of product defects that have traditionally been recognized in product liability law include manufacturing defects.
A design defect will support the imposition of liability on a strict product liability basis.
A statute of repose places outer time limits on product liability actions.
Stan, an air conditioning and heating technician, files a suit against Temp-Set Corporation, alleging that its thermostats are unreasonably dangerous due to the possibility of electrical shock. Temp-Set's best defense is most likely
The law imposes strict liability as a matter of public policy based in part on the assumption that manufacturers can better bear the costs associated with injuries caused by their products.
A design defect is not the sort of product defect that will support the imposition of liability on a strict product liability basis.
A product liability action based on negligence requires privity of contract between the injured plaintiff and the defendant-manufacturer.
Soda Bubbles Corporation makes and sells soft drinks. Talia buys and drinks a Soda beverage, which proves defective and injures her. One justification for holding Soda strictly liable for the harm caused to Talia by its defective product is that
Safe-Rite Company makes electrical cords and other connectors for electronic devices. Tina files a product liability suit against Safe-Rite, alleg-ing a warning defect. In deciding whether to hold Safe-Rite liable, the court may consider
Wideload, Inc., makes, sells, and leases trucks, trailers, and other moving and hauling equipment for consumer use. Verna files a product liability suit against Wideload, alleging a design defect. In deciding whether to hold the maker liable, the court may consider
Sellers are required to take precautions against every conceivable misuse of a product.
Assumption of risk can never be used as a defense in a product liability action.
AgriGro, Inc., sells hybrid seed to farms and other agricultural enterprises. Brandon buys and plants AgriGro seed on his Country Farm, but no crop grows because the seed is defective. Brandon sues AgriGro for product liability based on negligence. To win, Brandon must show that
Garage Magic, Inc., contracts for the sale of a certain number of garage door openers to Home & Yard Hardware stores. Ian buys one of openers. The applicable statute of limitations prescribes a period of four years. To bring a product liability claim against Garage Magic, Ian must file a suit within four years of
Even if a particular danger is commonly known by the users of a product, the maker or seller of must warn these users of the danger.
Generally, the strict liability of manufactures and other sellers does not extend to injured bystanders.
The types of product defects that have traditionally been recognized in product liability law include inadequate warnings.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)