Exam 17: Writing, electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)

A writing that satisfies the requirement of a writing under the statute of frauds could be evidenced by:

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(45)

Because many oral contracts are legally enforceable,it is a good business practice in the preliminary stages of discussions to stipulate that no binding agreement is intended to be formed until a written contract is prepared and signed by the parties.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(48)

The parol evidence rule does not apply to changes made after the signing of the contract.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)

Under the majority view,a contract that does not satisfy the statute of frauds is not enforceable.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(39)

The Uniform Commercial Code contains a statute of frauds rule relating to sales of personal property,specifically:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

Details of performance of a contract not expressly stated in a contract will often be implied by the court.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(48)

Bart was a self-made millionaire who had earned his fortune by dedicated hard work.Bart had worked so hard that he never had developed much of a social life.Bart met Linda and fell in love with her.When Bart proposed to Linda,she told him that she needed time before making such an important decision.Pressing her for a favorable response,Bart telephoned Linda and promised her $100,000 if she would marry him.Linda then accepted the proposal. Bart contracted with Quick Builders for the construction of a home Bart intended to move into with Linda after their marriage.Construction by Quick was not very quick because Quick was not paying subcontractors the sums that they were owed.They,in turn,were not completing their work.To expedite matters,Bart called the subcontractors and assured them that Bart would pay any sums that Quick Builders did not pay if they would complete the construction. Bart and Linda married and the subcontractors completed the work.Quick Builders did not pay the subcontractors in full.Bart failed to pay Linda the $100,000.Both Linda and the subcontractors sued Bart.Discuss the probable outcome of the lawsuits.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(36)

Customs and trade usage can override the express provisions of a contract.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(36)

An oral contract can be enforced when it relates to:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)

An oral contract containing a promise by an executor to pay estate debts from estate funds is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)

When a contract falls within the statute of frauds,the signatures of both parties must be shown to the court.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)

When the main purpose of the promisor's promise to pay the debt of another is to benefit the promisor,the statute of frauds is not applicable,and the oral promise to pay the debt is binding.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(42)

Under the statute of frauds,an oral contract must be completed within one year after performance begins.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)

The standard statute of frauds:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)

A promise to pay an attorney a fee owed by a third person can be enforced without a writing.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(42)

The statute of frauds applies to promises to answer for another party's debt,but does not apply to a promise to answer for another party's default.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(39)

The parol evidence rule is based on the theory that any oral agreement was abandoned when the contact was written.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(42)

A promise to grant a mortgage on real property does not require written proof because it is not a transfer of land.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)

An oral agreement to supply a line of credit for two (2)years cannot be enforced because of the statute of frauds.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(30)
Showing 41 - 60 of 60
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)