Question 1

When advising a suspect of the Miranda rights:

Accepted Answer

A) officers must quote the warnings as stated by the Supreme Court in Miranda v.Arizona . 
B) officers must give the suspect a Miranda waiver form to sign and must refrain from commenting on it. 
C) officers must make sure that the suspect understands the Miranda warnings even if this means explaining them in simple language. 
D) officers do not need to read the Miranda warnings if the suspect already knows them. 
A) officers must quote the warnings as stated by the Supreme Court in Miranda v.Arizona . 
B) officers must give the suspect a Miranda waiver form to sign and must refrain from commenting on it. 
C) officers must make sure that the suspect understands the Miranda warnings even if this means explaining them in simple language. 
D) officers do not need to read the Miranda warnings if the suspect already knows them. C

Question 2

Will Eric's statement to Officer Franklin be admissible

Accepted Answer

A) Yes, there is an exception to the Miranda requirements for statements made at booking. 
B) Yes, under Berghuis v.Thompkin all statements are admissible if the suspect voluntarily answers questions. 
C) No, Eric was in custody at the time Officer Franklin questioned him and he had not waived his Miranda rights. 
D) No, the question did not pertain to the charges that Eric was being booked on. 
A) Yes, there is an exception to the Miranda requirements for statements made at booking. 
B) Yes, under Berghuis v.Thompkin all statements are admissible if the suspect voluntarily answers questions. 
C) No, Eric was in custody at the time Officer Franklin questioned him and he had not waived his Miranda rights. 
D) No, the question did not pertain to the charges that Eric was being booked on. C

Question 3

Compare and contrast interrogation during a stop based on reasonable suspicion and one after arrest.

Accepted Answer

When an officer detains someone based on reasonable suspicion, the officer may briefly question the person who has been detained.Miranda warnings are not required.Proceeding without the warnings gives the officer a better chance of obtain information than he/she would have had if the suspect was given the Miranda warnings.On the other hand, the questioning must be brief.
When a person is under arrest he/she is in custody; Miranda warnings must be given before the person can be questioned.Giving the Miranda warnings makes it more likely that the suspect will recognize his/her right to refuse to answer questions. If the suspect waives his/her rights, the questioning can continue until either the officer or the suspect stops it.The Supreme Court, in the Miranda decision, viewed questioning in the police station as inherently coercive.To balance the scales, the court ruled that Miranda warnings were required before police could conduct custodial interrogation.

Question 4

Compare and contrast the Miranda rights and those the Supreme Court applied in the Massiah case for suspects who have been indicted.Poorly phrased and

Accepted Answer

Officers must give the Miranda warnings

Question 5

The Miranda warnings are required during booking:

Accepted Answer

A) Never 
B) Not required when booking officer asks for name of person to contact in case of an emergency 
C) Required if booking officer is asking for information regarding the crime for which the suspect is being booked 
D) Required prior to asking any questions during booking 
A) Never 
B) Not required when booking officer asks for name of person to contact in case of an emergency 
C) Required if booking officer is asking for information regarding the crime for which the suspect is being booked 
D) Required prior to asking any questions during booking

Question 6

If a suspect invokes the right to have an attorney present during questioning, the police must not attempt to persuade the suspect to continue the questioning without an attorney present.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 7

The privilege against self-incrimination can only be invoked if the suspect could be charged in criminal court as a result of statements made.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 8

A person who has been given immunity can invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination:

Accepted Answer

A) Never. 
B) to protect other people but not him/herself. 
C) for crimes not covered by transactional immunity. 
D) whenever questioned about a crime he/she committed. 
A) Never. 
B) to protect other people but not him/herself. 
C) for crimes not covered by transactional immunity. 
D) whenever questioned about a crime he/she committed.

Question 9

A person who is subpoenaed to testify in a criminal trial (not a defendant) can invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by:

Accepted Answer

A) refusing to take the witness stand. 
B) taking the witness stand but refusing to answer any questions. 
C) invoking the Fifth Amendment in response to specific questions. 
D) A person who is not the defendant cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment. 
A) refusing to take the witness stand. 
B) taking the witness stand but refusing to answer any questions. 
C) invoking the Fifth Amendment in response to specific questions. 
D) A person who is not the defendant cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment.

Question 10

Which of the following would be considered a volunteered statement for purposes of Miranda

Accepted Answer

A) Statement a person makes before police initiate questioning 
B) Statement a person makes during interrogation that is not in response to a question 
C) Statement a person makes without coercion 
D) All of the above qualify as volunteered statements 
A) Statement a person makes before police initiate questioning 
B) Statement a person makes during interrogation that is not in response to a question 
C) Statement a person makes without coercion 
D) All of the above qualify as volunteered statements

Question 11

Assume for this question that Eric invoked the right to remain silent when he told Officer Franklin to "Get out of here!": Will Eric's statement to Officer Hill about the carjacking be admissible in court

Accepted Answer

A) Yes, statements are admissible if the questioning stopped and there is a two hour period before questioning resumes. 
B) Yes, the questions related to a different crime than the one being discussed when Eric invoked his right to remain silent. 
C) No, the time between sessions was sufficient but Officer Hill did not obtain a Miranda waiver. 
D)  No, once a suspect invokes the right to remain silent the police are not allowed to question the person again. 
A) Yes, statements are admissible if the questioning stopped and there is a two hour period before questioning resumes. 
B) Yes, the questions related to a different crime than the one being discussed when Eric invoked his right to remain silent. 
C) No, the time between sessions was sufficient but Officer Hill did not obtain a Miranda waiver. 
D)  No, once a suspect invokes the right to remain silent the police are not allowed to question the person again.

Question 12

If Miranda warnings are given correctly and the suspect does not invoke his/her rights, officers may conduct more than one interrogation session without giving Miranda warnings again.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 13

The defendant invokes the privilege against self-incrimination at trial by claiming the Fifth Amendment in response to each question.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 14

Miranda warnings must be given at the time a suspect is arrested and taken into custody.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 15

Miranda warnings are not required when a suspect is questioned by an undercover police officer posing as a cellmate.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 16

The first Miranda warning states: You have the right to remain silent.This right applies:

Accepted Answer

A) If you do not invoke the right to remain silent at the start of questioning you do not have the right to invoke it later If you waive the right to remain silent, you cannot invoke it again. 
B) If you waive the right to remain silent, you have the right to invoke it at any time during police questioning. 
C) The Fifth Amendment right to remain silent applies to questioning by federal agents but does not apply to actions by state law enforcement agents. 
A) If you do not invoke the right to remain silent at the start of questioning you do not have the right to invoke it later If you waive the right to remain silent, you cannot invoke it again. 
B) If you waive the right to remain silent, you have the right to invoke it at any time during police questioning. 
C) The Fifth Amendment right to remain silent applies to questioning by federal agents but does not apply to actions by state law enforcement agents.

Question 17

Volunteered statements are admissible even though Miranda warnings were not given.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 18

The Fifth Amendment can be used as grounds to refuse to give a voice exemplar.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 19

Miranda warnings are required prior to both direct and indirect questioning of a suspect who is in custody.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 20

List three situations in which the Supreme Court allows the police to question a suspect more than once.Which of these, if any, do you think follows the spirit of the original Miranda decision

Accepted Answer

Three situations in which the Supreme Co

When advising a suspect of the Miranda rights:

Will Eric's statement to Officer Franklin be admissible

Compare and contrast interrogation during a stop based on reasonable suspicion and one after arrest.

Compare and contrast the Miranda rights and those the Supreme Court applied in the Massiah case for suspects who have been indicted.Poorly phrased and

The Miranda warnings are required during booking:

If a suspect invokes the right to have an attorney present during questioning, the police must not attempt to persuade the suspect to continue the questioning without an attorney present.

The privilege against self-incrimination can only be invoked if the suspect could be charged in criminal court as a result of statements made.

A person who has been given immunity can invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination:

A person who is subpoenaed to testify in a criminal trial (not a defendant) can invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by:

Which of the following would be considered a volunteered statement for purposes of Miranda

Assume for this question that Eric invoked the right to remain silent when he told Officer Franklin to "Get out of here!": Will Eric's statement to Officer Hill about the carjacking be admissible in court

If Miranda warnings are given correctly and the suspect does not invoke his/her rights, officers may conduct more than one interrogation session without giving Miranda warnings again.

The defendant invokes the privilege against self-incrimination at trial by claiming the Fifth Amendment in response to each question.

Miranda warnings must be given at the time a suspect is arrested and taken into custody.

Miranda warnings are not required when a suspect is questioned by an undercover police officer posing as a cellmate.

The first Miranda warning states: You have the right to remain silent.This right applies:

Volunteered statements are admissible even though Miranda warnings were not given.

The Fifth Amendment can be used as grounds to refuse to give a voice exemplar.

Miranda warnings are required prior to both direct and indirect questioning of a suspect who is in custody.

List three situations in which the Supreme Court allows the police to question a suspect more than once.Which of these, if any, do you think follows the spirit of the original Miranda decision

Introduction

The Role of the Courts

The Adjudication Process

Types of Evidence

Direct and Circumstantial Evidence

Witnesses

Crime Scene Evidence and Experiments

Documentary Evidence, Models, Maps, and Diagrams

Hearsay and Its Exceptions

Privileged Communications

Developing Law of Search and Seizure

Field Interviews, Arrests, and Jail Searches

Plain View, Consent, Vehicles, and Administrative Searches

Usa Patriot Act, Foreign Intelligence, and Other Electronic Surveillance

Identification Procedures

Preparing the Case for Court

Filters

Exam 15: Self-Incrimination

When advising a suspect of the Miranda rights:

Will Eric's statement to Officer Franklin be admissible

Compare and contrast interrogation during a stop based on reasonable suspicion and one after arrest.

Compare and contrast the Miranda rights and those the Supreme Court applied in the Massiah case for suspects who have been indicted.Poorly phrased and

The Miranda warnings are required during booking:

If a suspect invokes the right to have an attorney present during questioning, the police must not attempt to persuade the suspect to continue the questioning without an attorney present.

The privilege against self-incrimination can only be invoked if the suspect could be charged in criminal court as a result of statements made.

A person who has been given immunity can invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination:

A person who is subpoenaed to testify in a criminal trial (not a defendant) can invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by:

Which of the following would be considered a volunteered statement for purposes of Miranda

Assume for this question that Eric invoked the right to remain silent when he told Officer Franklin to "Get out of here!": Will Eric's statement to Officer Hill about the carjacking be admissible in court

If Miranda warnings are given correctly and the suspect does not invoke his/her rights, officers may conduct more than one interrogation session without giving Miranda warnings again.

The defendant invokes the privilege against self-incrimination at trial by claiming the Fifth Amendment in response to each question.

Miranda warnings must be given at the time a suspect is arrested and taken into custody.

Miranda warnings are not required when a suspect is questioned by an undercover police officer posing as a cellmate.

The first Miranda warning states: You have the right to remain silent.This right applies:

Volunteered statements are admissible even though Miranda warnings were not given.

The Fifth Amendment can be used as grounds to refuse to give a voice exemplar.

Miranda warnings are required prior to both direct and indirect questioning of a suspect who is in custody.

List three situations in which the Supreme Court allows the police to question a suspect more than once.Which of these, if any, do you think follows the spirit of the original Miranda decision

Introduction

The Role of the Courts

The Adjudication Process

Types of Evidence

Direct and Circumstantial Evidence

Witnesses

Crime Scene Evidence and Experiments

Documentary Evidence, Models, Maps, and Diagrams

Hearsay and Its Exceptions

Privileged Communications

Developing Law of Search and Seizure

Field Interviews, Arrests, and Jail Searches

Plain View, Consent, Vehicles, and Administrative Searches

Usa Patriot Act, Foreign Intelligence, and Other Electronic Surveillance

Identification Procedures

Preparing the Case for Court

Filters