Exam 14: Game Theory
Exam 1: Introduction60 Questions
Exam 2: Supply and Demand151 Questions
Exam 3: Applying the Supply-And-Demand Model124 Questions
Exam 4: Consumer Choice125 Questions
Exam 5: Applying Consumer Theory118 Questions
Exam 6: Firms and Production128 Questions
Exam 7: Costs124 Questions
Exam 8: Competitive Firms and Markets127 Questions
Exam 9: Applying the Competitive Model156 Questions
Exam 10: General Equilibrium and Economic Welfare122 Questions
Exam 11: Monopoly147 Questions
Exam 12: Pricing and Advertising135 Questions
Exam 13: Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition128 Questions
Exam 14: Game Theory109 Questions
Exam 15: Factor Markets103 Questions
Exam 16: Interest Rates, Investments, and Capital Markets120 Questions
Exam 17: Uncertainty122 Questions
Exam 18: Externalities, Open-Access, and Public Goods123 Questions
Exam 19: Asymmetric Information119 Questions
Exam 20: Contracts and Moral Hazards107 Questions
Select questions type
Which auctioned good is more likely to have different private values across potential bidders?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
A player can choose among three strategies: T,M,and B.Nevertheless,strategy B is dominated by strategy T.This means that
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
If an incumbent faces an identical potential entrant with no costs of entry,the incumbent will
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(37)
Assume a firm is a monopoly and enjoys $10,000,000 profits per year.The firm lobbies to have a moratorium passed by Congress on new firms in its market for the next 25 years.If there is no discount rate,how much would any firm(s)arguing against the moratorium be willing to spend to block it?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
A surprising outcome of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game is that
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)
What is the counter-intuitive solution to a mixed strategy?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
-The above figure shows the payoff matrix facing an incumbent firm.Assuming a fixed cost of entry,will the incumbent deter entry? Why?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(39)
Laboratory experiments of the ultimatum games revealed that
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
With regard to preventing entry,if identical firms act simultaneously,
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(31)
In a two-player simultaneous game,if player A has a dominant strategy and player B does not,player B will
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(41)
-The above figure shows a payoff matrix for two firms,A and B,that must choose between a high-price strategy and a low-price strategy.The Nash equilibrium in this game

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
A firm producing a relatively large quantity before any rivals have entered the market,is an example of first-mover advantage.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)
-The above figure shows the payoffs to two airlines,A and B,of serving a particular route.Is there a Nash equilibrium? What is it? Explain.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)
In a non-cooperative,imperfect information,simultaneous-choice,one-period game,a Nash equilibrium
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Two identical firms are considering entering a new market that currently has no suppliers.The demand is large enough for both firms to make a positive profit.There are no fixed costs to enter.Explain how a simultaneous decision to enter on the part of the two firms will lead to a different outcome than a sequential entry decision.
(Essay)
4.7/5
(32)
Which of the following is LEAST likely characterized by mixed strategies?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
Which auctioned good is more likely to have a common value across potential bidders?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
Showing 21 - 40 of 109
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)