Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statementsintra-Entity Asset Transactions

Walsh Company sells inventory to its subsidiary, Fisher Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Walsh uses the equity method to account for its investment in Fisher. In the consolidation worksheet for 2012, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales?

Virginia Corp. owned all of the voting common stock of Stateside Co. Both companies use the perpetual inventory method, and Virginia decided to use the partial equity method to account for this investment. During 2012, Virginia made cash sales of $400,000 to Stateside. The gross profit rate was 30% of the selling price. By the end of 2012, Stateside had sold 75% of the goods to outside parties for $420,000 cash. Prepare the consolidation entries that should be made at the end of 2012.

On January 1, 2012, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc. transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. Compute Collins' share of Smeder's net income for 2013.

What is the purpose of the adjustments to depreciation expense within the consolidation process when there has been an intra-entity transfer of a depreciable asset?

On January 1, 2012, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc. transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. Compute the gain recognized by Smeder Company relating to the equipment for 2012.

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2012. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. Compute the non-controlling interest in the net income of Devin for 2013.

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2012. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. What is the consolidated gain or loss on equipment for 2012?

Throughout 2013, Cleveland Co. sold inventory to Leeward Co., its subsidiary. From a consolidated point of view, when will the gain on this transfer be earned?

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2012 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: 2012 2013 2014 Net income \ 100,000 \ 120,000 \ 130,000 Dividends 40,000 50,000 60,000 Compute Wilson's share of income from Simon for consolidation for 2012.

Several years ago Polar Inc. acquired an 80% interest in Icecap Co. The book values of Icecap's asset and liability accounts at that time were considered to be equal to their fair values. Polar's acquisition value corresponded to the underlying book value of Icecap so that no allocations or goodwill resulted from the transaction. The following selected account balances were from the individual financial records of these two companies as of December 31, 2013: Polar Icecap Inc. Co. Sales \ 896,000 \ 504,000 Cost of goods sold 406,000 276,000 Operating expenses 210,000 147,000 Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,036,000 252,000 Inventory 484,000 154,000 Buildings (net) 501,000 220,000 Investment income not given Assume that Polar sold inventory to Icecap at a markup equal to 25% of cost. Intra-entity transfers were $130,000 in 2012 and $165,000 in 2013. Of this inventory, $39,000 of the 2012 transfers were retained and then sold by Icecap in 2013, while $55,000 of the 2013 transfers were held until 2014. Required: For the consolidated financial statements for 2013, determine the balances that would appear for the following accounts: (1) Cost of Goods Sold, (2) Inventory, and (3) Non-controlling Interest in Subsidiary's Net Income.

When is the gain on an intra-entity transfer of land realized?

Parent sold land to its subsidiary for a gain in 2010. The subsidiary sold the land externally for a gain in 2013. Which of the following statements is true?

On January 1, 2013, Race Corp. acquired 80% of the voting common stock of Gallow Inc. During the year, Race sold to Gallow for $450,000 goods which cost $330,000. Gallow still owned 15% of the goods at year-end. Gallow's reported net income was $204,000, and Race's net income was $806,000. Race decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. What was the non-controlling interest's share of consolidated net income?

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2012. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. Compute the income from Devin reported on Pepe's books for 2012.

On January 1, 2012, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc. transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. Compute Collins' share of Smeder's net income for 2012.

Patti Company owns 80% of the common stock of Shannon, Inc. In the current year, Patti reports sales of $10,000,000 and cost of goods sold of $7,500,000. For the same period, Shannon has sales of $200,000 and cost of goods sold of $160,000. During the year, Patti sold merchandise to Shannon for $60,000 at a price based on the normal markup. At the end of the year, Shannon still possesses 30 percent of this inventory. Compute consolidated cost of goods sold.

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2012 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: 2012 2013 2014 Net income \ 100,000 \ 120,000 \ 130,000 Dividends 40,000 50,000 60,000 Compute the amortization of gain through a depreciation adjustment for 2012 for consolidation purposes.

What is the impact on the non-controlling interest of a subsidiary when there are downstream transfers of inventory between the parent and subsidiary companies?

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc. sold land to Parker on May 1, 2012, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2012 for $92,000 in 2014. Compute income from Stark reported on Parker's books for 2014.

Several years ago Polar Inc. acquired an 80% interest in Icecap Co. The book values of Icecap's asset and liability accounts at that time were considered to be equal to their fair values. Polar's acquisition value corresponded to the underlying book value of Icecap so that no allocations or goodwill resulted from the transaction. The following selected account balances were from the individual financial records of these two companies as of December 31, 2013: Polar Icecap Inc. Co. Sales \ 896,000 \ 504,000 Cost of goods sold 406,000 276,000 Operating expenses 210,000 147,000 Retained earnings, 1/1/13 1,036,000 252,000 Inventory 484,000 154,000 Buildings (net) 501,000 220,000 Investment income not given Assume that Icecap sold inventory to Polar at a markup equal to 25% of cost. Intra-entity transfers were $70,000 in 2012 and $112,000 in 2013. Of this inventory, $29,000 of the 2012 transfers were retained and then sold by Polar in 2013, whereas $49,000 of the 2013 transfers were held until 2014. Required: For the consolidated financial statements for 2013, determine the balances that would appear for the following accounts: (1) Cost of Goods Sold, (2) Inventory, and (3) Non-controlling Interest in Subsidiary's Net Income.