Exam 2: Sources of the Law

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

____________ includes the freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion.

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

Pierce was arrested under a city ordinance that made distributing handbills on the city streets a crime. Pierce argued that the U.S. Constitution guaranteed his right to free speech under the First Amendment. The local prosecutor argued that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution did not apply to state laws. Was the prosecutor correct? Explain.

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
Verified

The prosecutor was wrong. Pierce's argument was correct in that the Fourteenth Amendment extends the protections of the Bill of Rights to state governments.

Small towns want to restrict the speed of trains passing through the towns to 20 miles per hour. The Federal Railroad Administration allows trains to travel through the towns at up to 70 miles per hour. Discuss whether or not the towns may restrict the speed of the trains. The administration should analyze if this decision of the state comes with the intent of taking extra precautions for public safety. Have accidents occurred in the past? Notwithstanding, state statutes can be preempted by federal statutes in areas that are traditionally that of the federal government.

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(41)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The decision to restrict the speed of trains passing through small towns to 20 miles per hour would need to be carefully considered. The Federal Railroad Administration allows trains to travel through the towns at up to 70 miles per hour, but the towns may have valid reasons for wanting to impose a lower speed limit.

First and foremost, the safety of the residents in the small towns should be a top priority. If there have been accidents or safety concerns related to trains traveling at higher speeds through the towns in the past, then the towns may have a valid argument for wanting to restrict the speed of the trains.

However, it's important to note that state statutes can be preempted by federal statutes in areas that are traditionally that of the federal government. In this case, the regulation of train speeds and railroad safety is typically within the jurisdiction of the Federal Railroad Administration. Therefore, the towns may not have the authority to unilaterally impose a lower speed limit on trains passing through their jurisdiction.

Ultimately, the decision would need to be carefully evaluated, taking into consideration both the safety concerns of the towns and the authority of the Federal Railroad Administration. It may be necessary for the towns to work with the federal government to find a solution that addresses their safety concerns while also complying with federal regulations.

The principle of the separation of powers divides power between the state and federal government.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(24)

Stanley runs a business in Middletown. He knows bribing an officer in return for favorable duties is a crime. However, he avoids "bribery" by sending "gifts" to the sheriff as a token of appreciation for the officer's services to the town. The sheriff is impressed by Stanley's act and ensures that his business is "well protected." Analyze the situation.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(49)

According to the uncertainty principle, when intent and results coincide, it is usually based on the strategic thinking and experience of the persons involved.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)

Trade-offs rarely occur within the law.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(44)

Helen, a 15-year-old citizen of Illinois, was about to go to the doctor for an abortion when the Supreme Court of Michigan ruled that minors could not receive an abortion without parental consent. What effect might the Michigan Supreme Court's decision have on Helen?

(Essay)
5.0/5
(39)

A new administrative regulation allowed the Social Security Administration to charge women for Social Security cards, yet enabled men to obtain the cards for free. A lawsuit was filed challenging the constitutionality of this new regulation. If you were a justice on the Supreme Court you would most likely

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)

The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that the President can veto any state law that conflicts with the U.S. Constitution.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)

The purpose of a complex adaptive system is the survival and improvement of the legal ecosystem.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(37)

The law has built-in ____________-on the one hand, a person discovers the ____________ of the law when he understand the law's actual intent, while on the other hand, if a person holds to the ____________ of the law the person may have missed the true meaning.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

A Massachusetts law prohibited governmental agencies of Massachusetts from buying goods from companies that conducted business with Myanmar. If the U.S. Supreme Court were to strike down this law, what might be the basis?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(32)

A state law restricts the sulfur dioxide emissions from electric generation plants more severely than those of the federal Clean Air Act. Must an electric generation plant obey the state law or may it follow the federal statute?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(28)

A compilation of all the statutes of a particular state or the federal government is known as a code.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)

A business asks a court to interpret the way in which a newly enacted shoplifter detention statute will be applied if the business, at some future point, detains a suspected shoplifter. The court may:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)

The Articles of Confederation created a strong national government.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)

Under the doctrine of ____________, courts determine the constitutionality of statutes, regulations or executive actions, taking into account any ____________ in its analysis.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(43)

The 'devolution' of a right annuls the ethics and morality of a right.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)

In the "Opening Case," the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington D.C. sued the Department of Human Services claiming the Affordable Care Act (ACA) interferes with its First Amendment right to privacy. In the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington D.C., et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al. the plaintiffs (the Diocese) claim that the ACA interferes with its First Amendment right to free exercise of their religion by requiring Catholic institutions, including universities, hospitals, and social service organizations, to provide insurance for certain birth control-related services that the Church forbids.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(44)
Showing 1 - 20 of 50
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)