Exam 4: Parties to Offenses
Exam 1: Foundations of Criminal Law49 Questions
Exam 2: Elements of a Crime66 Questions
Exam 3: The Criminal Law in Daily Practice76 Questions
Exam 4: Parties to Offenses37 Questions
Exam 5: Criminal Homicide96 Questions
Exam 6: Assault and Sexual Assault103 Questions
Exam 7: Kidnapping and Related Offenses44 Questions
Exam 8: Property Destruction Offenses59 Questions
Exam 9: Theft,Fraud,and Related Offenses83 Questions
Exam 10: Robbery,Burglary,and Criminal Trespass86 Questions
Exam 11: Offenses Against Government Operations91 Questions
Exam 12: Public Disorder,Indecency,Health,and Safety Offenses89 Questions
Exam 13: Intoxication Offenses58 Questions
Exam 14: Preparatory Offenses and Organized Criminal Activity72 Questions
Exam 15: General Defenses and Justification113 Questions
Exam 16: Federal Criminal Law47 Questions
Select questions type
Under Texas law,post-crime assistance to the perpetrator of a crime is treated as a standalone offense,not under the law of parties.
Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(25)
Correct Answer:
True
The accomplice testimony rule permits the district attorney to compel one criminal defendant to testify against the other defendant.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(42)
Correct Answer:
False
Describe three examples of pre-crime assistance where an individual would be considered a co-principal in the subsequent commission of a crime.
Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
Answers may vary widely but the student response should include examples where the accused purposefully solicits,encourages,directs,aids,or attempts to aid another person in committing an offense.Examples would include a lookout or getaway car driver at a robbery,a leader of an organized crime family,or a person who provides equipment or weapons to another knowing that they will be used to commit a criminal offense.Another example would be where a jailer purposely leaves a cell unlocked to facilitate an escape.
List the three ways in which an individual can be held criminally responsible for someone else's conduct.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(34)
Mike's presence at a crime scene coupled with his verbal encouragement of Jeremy to commit a crime is sufficient for Mike to be held criminally responsible for Jeremy's illegal conduct.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(28)
In addition to the elements of the specific offense,what are the key factors that must be proven for a corporation to be held criminally responsible for a felony?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(36)
Under provisions of the Texas Penal Code,if a corporation is found guilty of committing a felony offense,the penalty assessed is a monetary fine and loss of its corporate charter.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(28)
Local governmental entities,such as cities,are subject to prosecution under the Texas Penal Code.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)
For a corporation to be held criminally responsible for a felonious act in Texas,the act must have been performed or approved by a ________(three words)___________ of the corporation.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(28)
Suzy works at a jewelry store.Her boyfriend Cary convinces Suzy to assist him in burglarizing the store.When Suzy closes the store on Saturday evening,she purposefully fails to activate the alarm system.Early Sunday morning Cary breaks into the store and steals thousands of dollars' worth of diamonds.He immediately flees to Mexico,leaving Suzy behind.Investigation of the crime subsequently focuses on Suzy.Under Texas law,which of the following is correct about this situation?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)
Jack robs a convenience store.He flees the scene and goes to his twin brother Mack's home.Jack tells Mack that he has robbed a store and needs to hide out for a few days.Mack agrees for Jack to stay at his house.Three days later,police officers arrive.Jack escapes out the back window but the officers arrest Mack.Mack may rightfully be convicted of:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(31)
The ______________ testimony rule prohibits conviction of a criminal defendant solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of his partner in crime.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(41)
An element of the offense that must be established in every crime case where a corporation is the defendant is that the illegal conduct:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
Texas was the last state to hold corporations criminally responsible.Why have so few prosecutions of corporations occurred in the intervening four decades?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(27)
To be held criminally liable for assisting another in committing an offense,an individual must have acted with ___________ to assist in its commission.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(36)
Under the law of parties,the acquittal of one co-defendant will result in the automatic acquittal of all other co-defendants.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
Texas law abolishes the Common Law distinction between principals and accessories.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(27)
Under Texas law,persons who provide pre-crime assistance to an offender are considered co-principles in the commission of the resultant offense.Is this a more just approach to the law of parties than the traditional Common Law distinction between principals and accessories? Why?
(Essay)
5.0/5
(30)
Rob encourages his six-year-old brother Ned to steal items from a grocery store and give them to Rob.Ned does as requested,stealing $25 worth of groceries.As to Rob's criminal responsibility:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Under Texas law,for a corporation to be criminally liable for a felony,the illegal conduct must have been authorized by:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Showing 1 - 20 of 37
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)