Exam 4: A Conceptual Framework: Recognition and Measurement of the Elements of Financial Statements
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of the contract-price method of measuring liabilities.
The contract-price method of measuring liabilities has both advantages and disadvantages.
Advantages:
1. Simplicity: The contract-price method is relatively simple to use, as it involves measuring liabilities at the amount specified in the contract. This can make it easier for companies to calculate and report their liabilities accurately.
2. Certainty: Using the contract-price method provides a high level of certainty regarding the amount of liabilities. Since the liabilities are measured at the contract price, there is no need for estimation or uncertainty about future cash flows.
3. Compliance: In some cases, using the contract-price method may be required by accounting standards or regulations. This can make it easier for companies to comply with reporting requirements.
Disadvantages:
1. Lack of relevance: The contract-price method may not always reflect the true economic value of the liabilities. In some cases, the contract price may not accurately represent the fair value of the liabilities, leading to potential distortions in financial reporting.
2. Inflexibility: Using the contract-price method can be inflexible, especially in situations where the contract price does not reflect the current market conditions or changes in the business environment. This can lead to outdated and inaccurate measurements of liabilities.
3. Limited applicability: The contract-price method may not be suitable for all types of liabilities, especially those that are complex or involve uncertain future cash flows. In such cases, alternative methods of measuring liabilities may be more appropriate.
In conclusion, while the contract-price method of measuring liabilities has its advantages in terms of simplicity, certainty, and compliance, it also has significant drawbacks in terms of relevance, inflexibility, and limited applicability. Companies should carefully consider these factors when deciding whether to use the contract-price method for measuring their liabilities.
It is a conventional accounting practice to recognise a doubtful debts expense when the probability of a decrease in economic benefits is:
The receipt of cash or its equivalent from an income transaction is known as:
Which of these is the strongest argument in favour of current replacement cost as an alternative to historical cost?
Assume that assets have been offered for sale and that PV = present value,MV = net market value and RC = current replacement cost.If RC > MV > PV,the deprival value of the asset is:
Explain and discuss the assertion that current replacement cost provides a more relevant but less reliable measure of assets than historical cost.
Under the Framework,assets should be recognised in the balance sheet when:
The amount that an entity would need to receive to compensate it for the loss of an asset is known as:
Which of the following provides an example of measurement based on a nominal scale?
Which of these is not a difference between the contract-price method and the internal-yield method of valuing liabilities?
For which of the following groups would all of the items be regarded as expenses under the Framework?
There is wide agreement that the soundest measure,conceptually,of value-in-use is:
If accountants cannot agree on a single basis of measurement,then the best approach is to present the financial statements under several alternatives and let the user choose the one that is best suited to their needs.Discuss.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)