Exam 17: Statutory Consumer Guarantees and the Australian Consumer Law
In relation to the consumer guarantee of fitness for purpose, which of the following statements is NOT true?
D
Do you consider that the remedies now available to consumers under the Australian Consumer Law are adequate?
The adequacy of remedies available to consumers under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) can be assessed by considering the scope and effectiveness of the protections and redress mechanisms it provides. The ACL, which came into effect on January 1, 2011, is a national, generic law that aims to protect consumers and ensure fair trading across Australia.
The ACL offers a range of remedies for consumers when goods or services fail to meet one or more of the consumer guarantees. These guarantees include that goods must be of acceptable quality, fit for any disclosed purpose, and match descriptions or samples, while services must be provided with due care and skill, be fit for any specified purpose, and be delivered within a reasonable time when there is no agreed end date.
When a product or service fails to meet a consumer guarantee, the ACL provides remedies such as:
1. Repair, replacement, or refund: Consumers have the right to ask for a repair, replacement, or refund when goods are faulty, unsafe, look unacceptable, or do not perform as expected. For minor problems, the seller can choose between providing a repair or offering a replacement or refund. For major problems, the consumer can choose the remedy.
2. Compensation for damages and loss: Consumers can seek compensation for any loss or damage caused by a product or service if it is reasonably foreseeable.
3. Cancellation of service contracts: If a service does not meet a consumer guarantee, consumers can cancel the service contract and seek a refund for the unused portion, or compensation for the difference in value between the service delivered and what they paid.
4. Additional protections: The ACL also provides protections against unfair contract terms, unsolicited consumer agreements, and misleading or deceptive conduct.
While the ACL provides a comprehensive framework for consumer protection, there are ongoing discussions about whether these remedies are adequate. Some argue that the enforcement of the ACL could be strengthened, and that consumers may not always be aware of their rights or may find it difficult to exercise them. Others suggest that the law could be updated to address emerging issues such as digital products and services, and to ensure that it keeps pace with technological advancements and changes in consumer behavior.
In conclusion, the Australian Consumer Law offers a robust set of remedies that are designed to protect consumers and ensure fair trading. However, the adequacy of these remedies can be subject to debate, and there may be areas where the law could be enhanced to better serve the needs of consumers in a rapidly evolving marketplace. It is important for consumers to be aware of their rights and for businesses to comply with their obligations under the ACL to ensure that the remedies provided are effectively utilized.
Why was the plaintiff successful in obtaining a full refund in the case of Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500?
B
The test of acceptable quality of goods is an objective test of the reasonable consumer.
For the Australian Consumer Law to apply, there must be a supply of goods or services to a consumer, by a supplier or manufacturer, in trade or commerce.
When will a buyer of defective goods NOT be protected under the Australian Consumer Law?
In relation to the supply of goods, when will a failure to comply with a consumer guarantee be considered a major failure?
Which of the following factors have to be taken into account in determining 'acceptability'?
Which of the following is NOT a difference between the Sale of Goods Acts and the Australian Consumer Law?
In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, why was Grant entitled to sue the retailer under Sale of Goods legislation?
Why was the manufacturer found liable in the case of: Drummond v Van Ingen (1887) as App Cas 284?
The guarantee that spare parts and repair facilities must be reasonably available applies to the supplier as well as the manufacturer.
When will a purchaser of goods NOT be considered a 'consumer' under the Australian Consumer Law?
Under the Australian Consumer Law goods supplied to a consumer in trade or commerce must be:
In relation to the consumer guarantee of acceptable quality, which of the following statements is NOT true?
If the supplier of goods fails to comply with a consumer guarantee which is not a major failure, a consumer may:
The Australian Consumer Law applies to all consumer transactions involving a sale of goods but not goods on exchange or lease.
Why was the plaintiff unsuccessful in the case of: Southern Cross Homes (Broken Hill) Inc v Chapman (1999) SASC 491?
Which of the following services are NOT covered by the consumer guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)