Exam 12: Consideration
Exam 1: Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning83 Questions
Exam 2: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution83 Questions
Exam 3: Court Procedures84 Questions
Exam 4: Constitutional Authority to Regulate Business84 Questions
Exam 15: The Statute of Fraudswriting Requirements84 Questions
Exam 5: Ethics and Business Decision Making84 Questions
Exam 6: Intentional Torts83 Questions
Exam 7: Negligence and Strict Liability84 Questions
Exam 8: Intellectual Property and Internet Law84 Questions
Exam 9: Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes84 Questions
Exam 10: Nature and Terminology84 Questions
Exam 11: Agreement83 Questions
Exam 12: Consideration84 Questions
Exam 13: Capacity and Legality84 Questions
Exam 14: Mistakes, Fraud, and Voluntary Consent84 Questions
Exam 16: Third Party Rights84 Questions
Exam 17: Performance and Discharge84 Questions
Exam 18: Breach of Contract and Remedies84 Questions
Exam 19: E-Contracts and E-Signatures84 Questions
Exam 20: The Formation of Sales and Lease Contracts84 Questions
Exam 21: Title, Risk, and Insurable Interest84 Questions
Exam 22: Performance Breach of Sales Lease Contracts84 Questions
Exam 23: Warranties and Product Liability84 Questions
Exam 24: The Function Creation of Negotiable Instruments84 Questions
Exam 25: Transferability and Holder in Due Course84 Questions
Exam 26: Liability, Defenses, and Discharge84 Questions
Exam 27: Checks, the Banking System, and E-Money84 Questions
Exam 28: Creditors Rights and Remedies84 Questions
Exam 29: Secured Transactions84 Questions
Exam 30: Bankruptcy Law83 Questions
Exam 31: Agency Formation and Duties84 Questions
Exam 32: Liability to Third Parties and Termination84 Questions
Exam 33: Employment and Labor Law84 Questions
Exam 34: Employment Discrimination84 Questions
Exam 35: Sole Proprietorships and Franchises84 Questions
Exam 36: Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships84 Questions
Exam 37: Limited Liability Companies Special Business Forms84 Questions
Exam 38: Corporationsformation and Financing84 Questions
Exam 40: Corporationsmerger, Consolidation, Termination84 Questions
Exam 41: Corporationssecurities Law Corporate Governance84 Questions
Exam 42: Law for Small Businesses84 Questions
Exam 43: Administrative Law84 Questions
Exam 44: Consumer Law84 Questions
Exam 45: Environmental Law84 Questions
Exam 46: Antitrust Law84 Questions
Exam 47: Personal Property and Bailments84 Questions
Exam 48: Real Property and Landlord-Tenant Relationships84 Questions
Exam 49: Insurance84 Questions
Exam 50: Wills and Trusts84 Questions
Exam 51: Professional Liaility and Accountability84 Questions
Exam 52: International Law in a Global Economy84 Questions
Exam 53: Legal and Ethical Issues in Business12 Questions
Exam 54: Legal Issues11 Questions
Exam 55: Contracts and Business Law14 Questions
Exam 56: Contracts and Liability6 Questions
Exam 57: Banking and Payment Systems8 Questions
Exam 58: Loan Security and Repossession in Credit Transactions4 Questions
Exam 59: Employment Law and Ethics8 Questions
Exam 60: Legal Issues in Corporate Governance and Business Operations10 Questions
Exam 61: Legal and Ethical Issues in Environmental Protection and Consumer Rights6 Questions
Exam 62: Legal Issues in Property and Land Use4 Questions
Exam 63: Accounting and Ethics6 Questions
Select questions type
Under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, every gratuitous promise is binding if the promisee changes position in reliance on the promise.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(43)
Any promise made with respect to a past event is enforceable because the event is cer?tain-it has already occurred.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)
Chris promises Dina $40,000 if she graduates from Eagle College. Dina enrolls in Eagle, attends full-time for four years, and graduates. When Dina asks Chris for $40,000, Chris says, "I don't re?member promising you $40,000. But if there was a promise, it's not en?forceable, because we didn't bargain for it. And even if there was a prom?ise that would otherwise be enforceable, I revoke it now." Can Dina en?force Chris's "prom?ise"? Why or why not?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(34)
Fact Pattern 12-A2
Brad defends against a breach-of-contract suit by College Credit Corporation by claiming that their deal-a student loan accruing interest at a certain rate and payable beginning on a certain date-was unfair because the consideration for their contract was inadequate.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 12-A2. If, as Brad claims, the consideration in this problem is inadequate, it may indicate a lack of
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(46)
Showing 81 - 84 of 84
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)