Exam 24: Remedies for Breach of Sales and Lease Contracts
Exam 1: An Introduction to Dynamic Business Law67 Questions
Exam 2: Business Ethics67 Questions
Exam 3: The US Legal System80 Questions
Exam 4: Alternative Dispute Resolution66 Questions
Exam 5: Constitutional Principles67 Questions
Exam 6: International and Comparative Law67 Questions
Exam 7: Crime and the Business Community79 Questions
Exam 8: Tort Law66 Questions
Exam 9: Negligence and Strict Liability71 Questions
Exam 10: Product Liability67 Questions
Exam 11: Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals67 Questions
Exam 12: Intellectual Property66 Questions
Exam 13: Introduction to Contracts71 Questions
Exam 14: Agreement66 Questions
Exam 15: Consideration64 Questions
Exam 16: Capacity and Legality66 Questions
Exam 17: Legal Assent67 Questions
Exam 18: Contracts in Writing65 Questions
Exam 19: Third-Party Rights to Contracts68 Questions
Exam 20: Discharge and Remedies66 Questions
Exam 21: Introduction to Sales and Lease Contracts65 Questions
Exam 22: Title, Risk of Loss, and Insurable Interest65 Questions
Exam 23: Performance and Obligations Under Sales and Leases65 Questions
Exam 24: Remedies for Breach of Sales and Lease Contracts66 Questions
Exam 25: Warranties65 Questions
Exam 26: Negotiable Instruments: Negotiability and Transferability66 Questions
Exam 27: Negotiation, Holder in Due Course, and Defenses69 Questions
Exam 28: Liability, Defenses, and Discharge67 Questions
Exam 29: Checks and Electronic Fund Transfers69 Questions
Exam 30: Secured Transactions65 Questions
Exam 31: Other Creditors Remedies and Suretyship65 Questions
Exam 32: Bankruptcy and Reorganization67 Questions
Exam 33: Agency Formation and Duties65 Questions
Exam 34: Liability to Third Parties and Termination65 Questions
Exam 35: Forms of Business Organization65 Questions
Exam 36: Partnerships: Nature, Formation, and Operation65 Questions
Exam 37: Partnerships: Termination and Limited Partnerships65 Questions
Exam 38: Corporations: Formation and Financing67 Questions
Exam 40: Corporations: Mergers, Consolidations, Terminations65 Questions
Exam 41: Corporations: Securities and Investor Protection67 Questions
Exam 42: Employment and Labor Law65 Questions
Exam 43: Employment Discrimination65 Questions
Exam 44: Administrative Law67 Questions
Exam 45: Consumer Law64 Questions
Exam 46: Environmental Law65 Questions
Exam 47: Antitrust Law65 Questions
Exam 48: The Nature of Property, Personal Property, and Bailments65 Questions
Exam 49: Real Property66 Questions
Exam 50: Landlord-Tenant Law65 Questions
Exam 51: Insurance Law65 Questions
Exam 52: Wills and Trusts64 Questions
Select questions type
Bernice purchased a new trampoline from ABC Trampolines. The purchase agreement signed provided that she released ABC Trampolines from any consequential damages for personal injury. Unfortunately, the trampoline ripped while she was using it causing Bernice to fall and break her leg. She asked ABC for damages but the manager refused. The manager referenced her agreement whereby she signed away her rights to consequential damages for personal injury. Is the manager right, and why or why not?
Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
The manager is incorrect because while under the UCC the parties may limit damages, a limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person in the case of consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable.
"Fixture Mishap." Trudy owns a hardware shop that also sells expensive bathroom fixtures. Theresa, a whiz with tools, purchased for $400 some expensive powder room fixtures for her bathroom. Trudy had only one set of the fixtures Theresa wanted. Although Theresa noticed a slight discoloration on one of the faucets, she went ahead with the contract because Trudy indicated that she would remedy the situation should the problem become worse. Because they were friends and attended the same church, Trudy gave Theresa 90 days in which to pay. A month later and before she paid for the fixtures, Theresa called Trudy and told her that the fixtures were corroding, the discoloration had worsened, and the fixtures looked terrible. Trudy told her that she would get replacements, but six months later they had not arrived. Trudy told Theresa that they were on back order. At that point, Theresa purchased fixtures elsewhere for $500 and informed Trudy that she could pick up the corroded fixtures at her front door. Trudy picked up the fixtures. They were obviously defective, but Trudy was able to resell them for $100. Trudy told Theresa that she would have gladly provided fixtures that would not corrode if she had only a bit more time, that Theresa should have given her a chance to do so, and that as far as Trudy is concerned, Theresa owes $300.
-Which of the following most accurately describes the action taken by Theresa?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(26)
Correct Answer:
B
Liquidated damages are identified after a contract breach occurs.
Free
(True/False)
5.0/5
(33)
Correct Answer:
False
"Refused Furniture." Selina arranges to sell furniture from her furniture store to Roland for $3,000. Roland was supposed to give Selina a $500 deposit on February 1 and pay the remainder in monthly installments. Selina was to deliver the furniture by February 7. Roland did not pay Selina as promised on February 1. He asked her to wait until March 1, but she refused. She told him that the contract was canceled, and she refused to deliver the furniture at all. Selina was able to sell the furniture for only $2,500 because of a downturn in the economy. Roland told Selina that she had no right to withhold or sell his furniture and that he was suing. Selina also incurred $100 in additional amounts in advertising costs to advertise the furniture that Roland initially purchased. Selina saved $40 in delivery costs because she did not have to deliver the furniture to Roland. The subsequent purchaser picked up her own furniture.
-Which of the following is true regarding Roland's claim that Selina had no right to withhold his furniture?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(27)
What are the rights of the parties under the UCC to provide for remedies in addition to those provided by the UCC?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Under the UCC buyers and lessees may recover goods identified in the contract if the seller or lessor becomes insolvent within ______ after receiving the first payment due under the agreement.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(28)
Which of the following was the result in Almetals Inc., v. Wickeder Westfalenstahl, GMBH, the case in the text involving the sale of a specialty metal in which the plaintiff sued the defendant for breach of contract seeking specific performance?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
What does the UCC provide regarding liquidated damages if the parties do not agree to them?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
What does the UCC provide regarding the availability of punitive damages?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Regarding the "Case Opener," what did the court rule regarding the liability of Abbott Industries following its supply of 1.2 million tubes of bad eye medication to Altana, a customer, for resale?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Which of the following is true regarding how the obligations of sellers/lessors and buyers/lessees are determined?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
If a buyer accepts nonconforming goods, the buyer may not also seek damages.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(29)
Which of the following damages, if any, may a seller receive who sells goods to another buyer when the original buyer is in breach?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
What was the result on appeal in Figgie International Inc., v. Destileria Serralles Inc, the case in the text involving a dispute over bottle-labeling equipment that did not perform as expected and whether usage of trade limited the buyer's remedy to repair, replacement, or return?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
Which of the following is true regarding revocation of accepted nonconforming goods?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(37)
"Refused Furniture." Selina arranges to sell furniture from her furniture store to Roland for $3,000. Roland was supposed to give Selina a $500 deposit on February 1 and pay the remainder in monthly installments. Selina was to deliver the furniture by February 7. Roland did not pay Selina as promised on February 1. He asked her to wait until March 1, but she refused. She told him that the contract was canceled, and she refused to deliver the furniture at all. Selina was able to sell the furniture for only $2,500 because of a downturn in the economy. Roland told Selina that she had no right to withhold or sell his furniture and that he was suing. Selina also incurred $100 in additional amounts in advertising costs to advertise the furniture that Roland initially purchased. Selina saved $40 in delivery costs because she did not have to deliver the furniture to Roland. The subsequent purchaser picked up her own furniture.
-Which of the following is true regarding Roland's claim that Selina had no right to sell the furniture he initially purchased?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(45)
Which of the following is the right of a buyer and lessee to substitute goods for those due under a sales or lease agreement?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(39)
Discuss when specific performance is available as a remedy against a seller or lessor when the sale of goods is involved, and what is involved if specific performance is decreed.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(35)
Under UCC 2-702(2), under which of the following circumstances may a seller reclaim goods when a buyer is in possession of goods and is in breach?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(26)
Showing 1 - 20 of 66
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)