Exam 21: Optimum Currency Areas and the Euro
How mobile is Europe's labor force?
Differences in language and cultural discourage labor movements between European countries. Differences in regional unemployment rates are smaller and less persistent in the United States than are differences between national unemployment rates in the European Union. Even, within European countries, labor mobility appears limited, partly because of government regulations. For example, the requirement in some countries that worker establish residence before receiving unemployment benefits makes it harder for unemployed workers to seek jobs in regions that are far from their current homes.
"The costs and benefits for a country from joining a fixed-exchange rate area such as the EMS depend on how well-integrated its economy is with those of its potential partners." Discuss.
We will expand on this idea, which is roughly the theory of an optimum currency area as developed by Mundell. A major economic benefit of fixed exchange rates is that they simplify economic calculations and provide a more predictable basis for decisions that involve international transactions than do floating rates. This gain in monetary efficiency would be even higher if the factors of production could migrate freely. The costs of joining a fixed-exchange rate area is that a country gives up the ability to use the exchange rate and monetary policy to stabilize the domestic economy. So, if a country has a well-integrated economy with those in the fixed-exchange rate area, then the benefits would likely outweigh the costs.
Is the EU an optimum currency area? Why or why not?
Europe is not an optimum currency area. Labor mobility is highly limited. Economic and political conflicts within the euro zone have been persistent and they continue to result in questions regarding the ability of the euro zone to survive going forward.
Why did the EU countries move away from the EMS toward the goal of a single shared currency?
The German central bank in the European Monetary System, 1979-1998
The result of the reunification of eastern and western Germany in 1990
Explain why even owners of capital that cannot be moved can avoid more of the economic stability loss due to fixed exchange rates when Norway's economy is open to capital flows.
Discuss the effects of the reunification of eastern and western Germany in 1990 on both Germany and its neighboring European countries.
"Given that labor remains relatively immobile within Europe, the European Union's success in liberalizing its capital flows may have worked perversely to worsen the economic stability loss due to the process of monetary unification." Discuss.
Did the 1957 Treaty of Rome turn the EU into a truly unified market?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)