Deck 6: Police and Law

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
Police officers must be in marked police cars when making traffic stops.
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
The Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee v. Garner (1985) that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless certain circumstances warrant it.
Question
Borders and airports always allow searches without warrants.
Question
Warrants are issued after the police clearly demonstrate reasonable suspicion.
Question
The plain view doctrine was initially discussed in Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971).
Question
Consent searches occur when there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed.  In a consent search , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant or following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
Question
The legal test for determining the existence of probable cause is referred to as the totality of circumstances. ​
Question
In Terry v. Ohio (1968) the U.S. Supreme Court established the flexible "totality of circumstances" test for determining the existence of the probable cause.
Question
If a person is growing marijuana in plain sight of a passing police car, a police officer does not need a warrant to search and seize the evidence.
Question
Most stops must be supported by reasonable suspicion; an arrest or a search warrant must be supported by enough information to constitute
probable cause.
Question
There is no hard-and fast definition of probable cause that can be applied to every situation.
Question
Probable cause must be established before an arrest warrant is issued.
Question
"Stops" are defined as events that violate individuals' reasonable expectations of privacy.
Question
An affidavit is a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation from the police officers.
Question
Police are not allowed to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect, even if officers believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious harm to others.
Question
The clause protecting against unreasonable search and seizure is found in the Fifth Amendment.
Question
Both government officials and private citizens are empowered to make stops.
Question
A "general warrant" for searching many locations is the most common type of warrant issued.
Question
A consent search provides a valuable investigatory tool for officers.
Question
The majority of searches take place without a warrant.
Question
All illegally obtained evidence will be excluded from trial based upon the exclusionary rule.
Question
Even if a police officer is acting in the interests of public safety, he or she must obtain a warrant before searching an area.
Question
Warrantless searches often take place at the entry points into the United States, including border crossings, ports, and airports.
Question
Prior to Miranda , police officers in some instances would torture suspects until a confession was delivered.
Question
In Wolf v. Colorado (1949), the Supreme Court incorporated the Fourth Amendment.
Question
If a police officer is acting in good faith, then he/she may use evidence obtained through the use of a defective search warrant.
Question
The __________ Amendment guarantees citizens protection against "unreasonable search and seizure."

A) Fourth
B) Fifth
C) Sixth
D) Eighth
E) Fourteenth
Question
Police are allowed to use deception when interrogating a suspect.
Question
Miranda warnings were established by the Supreme Court in Weeks v. U.S. (1914).
Question
In Nix v. Williams (1984), the U. S. Supreme Court established the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.
Question
Police officers must provide Miranda warnings if they approach someone on the street and begin questioning them.
Question
A situation in which a police officer uses his/her authority to deprive people of their liberty or property is called a:

A) search
B) seizure
C) entrapment
D) stop
E) hold
Question
Consent searches are unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
Question
The Miranda warnings apply only to what are called custodial interrogations.
Question
The good faith exception can only be used in federal cases due to U.S. v. Leon (1984).
Question
A brief interference with a person's freedom of movement with a duration that can be measured in minutes is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
Question
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) applied the exclusionary rule to the state court system.
Question
Miranda warnings must be read to a suspect prior to interrogation.
Question
The term "reasonable expectation of privacy" is most relevant to which of the following police activities?

A) Search
B) Seizure
C) Arrest
D) Stop
E) Interrogation
Question
Miranda warnings must be issued in written form and signed or initialed by the suspect.
Question
A written statement of fact, supported by oath or affirmation and submitted to judicial officers to fulfill the requirements of probable cause for obtaining a warrant, is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
Question
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in __________ that the totality of circumstance test should be used for determining the existence of probable cause.

A) Illinois v. Gates
B) Map v. Ohio
C) Roper v. Simmons
D) Hannity v. Patrick
E) Mapp v. Ohio
Question
When sufficient evidence is available to support the reasonable conclusion that a person has committed a crime, then a police officer may claim to have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) exigent circumstances.
C) probable cause.
D) justifiable intent.
E) permission to act.
Question
The phrase "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" may be found in which Amendment?

A) First
B) Fourth
C) Fifth
D) Sixth
E) Eighth
Question
Which of the following statements about search warrants is false?

A) Police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) Police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) Police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) Police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) Police officers need a search warrant even if a person waives his or her Fourth Amendment rights.
Question
Excessive use of force violates the _________ Amendment?

A) First
B) Second
C) Third
D) Fourth
E) Fifth
Question
_______ ruled that police can systematically stop drivers in order to seek information.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
Question
In United States v. Jones (2012)  the Supreme Court decided:

A) to make it a  requirement for the police to seek search warrants, if possible, before taking involuntary blood tests from suspected drunk drivers.
B) police do not need a warrant to search a car.
C) ​ that placing a GPS tracking device on a drug suspect's car without a warrant is a search that falls under the rules of the Fourth Amendment.
D) that arrest, even on minor offenses, makes people subject to intrusive strip searches and body cavity inspections when they are placed in jail.
E) that drug-sniffing dogs cannot be brought to the front door of a home to seek evidence that will be used to get a search warrant.
Question
In what circumstance is the totality of circumstances used?

A) To determine whether an offender is guilty
B) To determine whether to indict a suspect
C) To determine whether probable cause exists
D) To determine whether police acted appropriately
E) To determine whether to Mirandize a suspect
Question
Police officers seeking a warrant must present a(n) ______ to a judge .

A) arrest
B) affidavit
C) affluence
D) affinity
E) testament
Question
The _________ doctrine permits officers to notice and use as evidence items that are visible to them when they are in a location that they are permitted to be.

A) plain view
B) public safety
C) exigent circumstances
D) stop and frisk
E) Miranda
Question
A flexible test established by the Supreme Court for identifying whether probable cause exists that permits the judge to determine whether the available evidence is both sufficient and reliable enough to issue a warrant is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
Question
Someone who places a personal diary in a locked drawer within a bedroom of her home has demonstrated:

A) conditional acceptance.
B) adverse conditions.
C) a reasonable expectation of privacy.
D) strict scrutiny.
E) permissible behavior.
Question
Which U.S. Supreme Court case ruled that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless necessary to prevent their escape and unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of serious injury?

A) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
C) Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
D) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
E) Roper v. Simmons (2005)
Question
Illinois v. Gates (1983) is the U.S.Supreme Court decision that established that:

A) police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) the flexible  totality of circumstances  test for determining the  existence of the probable  cause needed for obtaining a  search warrant.
Question
A significant deprivation of liberty, involving taking a person into custody, transporting them to a police station or jail, and processing them into the criminal justice system, is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
Question
To obtain an arrest warrant, police must demonstrate:

A) reasonable expectation.
B) reasonable suspicion.
C) probable cause.
D) the exclusionary rule.
E) preponderance of the evidence.
Question
The majority of searches take place without:

A) a search.
B) a seizure.
C) a warrant.
D) an arrest.
E) permission.
Question
Which of the following is not a condition for the issuance of a warrant?

A) the existence of probable cause
B) the suspect must be informed of his/her rights
C) evidence must be presented to the judicial officer and be supported by "oath or affirmation,"
D) the warrant must describe the specific place to be searched
E) the warrant must describe the person or items to be seized
Question
In order for a stop to be permissible, officers must have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) probable cause.
C) legal insight.
D) preponderance of the evidence.
E) reasonable doubt.
Question
Terry v. Ohio endorsed:

A) warrantless searches for weapons.
B) victim's rights.
C) stop-and-frisk searches.
D) due process requirements.
E) witness safety procedures.
Question
Which would not permit a warrantless search?

A) Driving across the Canadian-U.S. border.
B) Sailing through a border seaport.
C) Suspicion of drugs in a known addict's apartment .
D) An international airport.
E) ​ Driving across the Mexican-U.S. border.
Question
A ________ search allows officers to conduct a permissible warrantless search of a person, vehicle, home, or location after receiving permission from the person in question.

A) no knock
B) consent
C) nonconsent
D) permissible
E) Terry
Question
The Supreme Court decision that endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested was:

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013).
B) Bailey v. United States (2013).
C) Chimel v. California (1969).
D) Maryland v. King (2013).
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012).
Question
When there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant.  This is termed:

A) exigent circumstances.
B) the exclusionary rule.
C) due process.
D) totality of circumstances.
E) probable cause.
Question
In which U.S. Supreme Court case was it established that criminal defendants must be read their rights?

A) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
B) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
C) Chimel v. California (1969)
D) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
Question
According to the Supreme Court, exigent circumstances might exist when:

A) officers believe they might find important evidence.
B) officers believe there is probable cause.
C) officers believe others might be in grave danger.
D) officers do not want to wait for a warrant.
E) officers are friendly with the suspects.
Question
_______ ruled that random stops by officers on patrol are not constitutional.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
Question
Which of the following types of searches is related to the search of an automobile?

A) Consent search.
B) Sobriety checkpoint.
C) Inventory search.
D) Plain view search.
E) Search incident to an arrest
Question
In which case did the Supreme Court endorse a police officer's authority to stop-and-frisk suspects on the streets when there is reasonable suspicion that they are armed and involved in criminal activity.

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013)
B) Bailey v. United States (2013)
C) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
D) Maryland v. King (2013)
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012)
Question
In the case of U.S. v. Drayton (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers:

A) must notify citizens they have the right to say "no" to a search.
B) must notify a citizen of his/her right against self-incrimination.
C) must notify a citizen of his/her right to an attorney.
D) are not obligated to notify citizens they have a right to say "no" to a search.
E) are not obligated to read citizens their rights prior to arrest.
Question
Terry v. Ohio endorsed stop-and-frisk searches to ensure _______.

A) officer safety
B) victim's rights
C) suspect rights
D) due process
E) witness safety
Question
According to ________, a suspect who, during a frisk, which is not justified by proper observation and reasonable suspicion , is found to be carrying drugs or weapons can seek to have the evidence excluded.

A) exigent circumstances
B) the exclusionary rule
C) due process
D) the totality of circumstances
E) probable cause
Question
Which of the following is not a required component of the Miranda warnings?

A) Notification that suspects have the right to an attorney during interrogation.
B) Notification that suspects have the right to remain silent.
C) Notification that any statement suspects make can be used against them in court.
D) Notification that the state will pay for an attorney if suspects cannot afford one.
E) Notification that suspects have the right to a speedy trial.
Question
Which of the following is not a way to legally conduct a search without a warrant?

A) Special needs search
B) Stop-and-frisk search
C) Automobile search
D) Supervisor enforced search
E) Witness statement search
Question
A "pat down" search is also known as a _________ search.

A) stop-and-frisk
B) Miranda
C) reasonable suspicion
D) totality of circumstances
E) plain view
Question
Which two decisions by the Court laid the foundation for Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

A) Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Massiah v. U. S. (1964)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
C) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
D) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Rochin v. California (1952)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1957) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Question
Permissible warrantless search of a vehicle that has been impounded so that police can make a record of the items contained in the vehicle is known as a(n):

A) plain view search.
B) probable cause search.
C) inventory search.
D) seizure.
E) search incident to arrest.
Question
In ________, the Supreme Court endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested.

A) Mapp v. Ohio
B) Terry v. Ohio
C) Chimel v. Ohio
D) Chimel v. California
E) Roper v. Simmons
Question
During a traffic stop, officers can order passengers as well as the driver to exit the vehicle, even if there is no basis for suspicion that the passengers engaged in any wrongdoing according to:

A) Carroll v. U.S. (1925)
B) Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990)
C) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
D) Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
E) California v. Acevedo (1991)
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/141
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 6: Police and Law
1
Police officers must be in marked police cars when making traffic stops.
False
2
The Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee v. Garner (1985) that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless certain circumstances warrant it.
True
3
Borders and airports always allow searches without warrants.
True
4
Warrants are issued after the police clearly demonstrate reasonable suspicion.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
The plain view doctrine was initially discussed in Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Consent searches occur when there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed.  In a consent search , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant or following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
The legal test for determining the existence of probable cause is referred to as the totality of circumstances. ​
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
In Terry v. Ohio (1968) the U.S. Supreme Court established the flexible "totality of circumstances" test for determining the existence of the probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
If a person is growing marijuana in plain sight of a passing police car, a police officer does not need a warrant to search and seize the evidence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Most stops must be supported by reasonable suspicion; an arrest or a search warrant must be supported by enough information to constitute
probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
There is no hard-and fast definition of probable cause that can be applied to every situation.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
Probable cause must be established before an arrest warrant is issued.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
"Stops" are defined as events that violate individuals' reasonable expectations of privacy.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
An affidavit is a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation from the police officers.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Police are not allowed to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect, even if officers believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious harm to others.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
The clause protecting against unreasonable search and seizure is found in the Fifth Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
Both government officials and private citizens are empowered to make stops.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
A "general warrant" for searching many locations is the most common type of warrant issued.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
A consent search provides a valuable investigatory tool for officers.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
The majority of searches take place without a warrant.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
All illegally obtained evidence will be excluded from trial based upon the exclusionary rule.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
Even if a police officer is acting in the interests of public safety, he or she must obtain a warrant before searching an area.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
Warrantless searches often take place at the entry points into the United States, including border crossings, ports, and airports.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
Prior to Miranda , police officers in some instances would torture suspects until a confession was delivered.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
In Wolf v. Colorado (1949), the Supreme Court incorporated the Fourth Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
If a police officer is acting in good faith, then he/she may use evidence obtained through the use of a defective search warrant.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
The __________ Amendment guarantees citizens protection against "unreasonable search and seizure."

A) Fourth
B) Fifth
C) Sixth
D) Eighth
E) Fourteenth
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
Police are allowed to use deception when interrogating a suspect.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
Miranda warnings were established by the Supreme Court in Weeks v. U.S. (1914).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
In Nix v. Williams (1984), the U. S. Supreme Court established the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
Police officers must provide Miranda warnings if they approach someone on the street and begin questioning them.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
A situation in which a police officer uses his/her authority to deprive people of their liberty or property is called a:

A) search
B) seizure
C) entrapment
D) stop
E) hold
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
Consent searches are unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
The Miranda warnings apply only to what are called custodial interrogations.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
The good faith exception can only be used in federal cases due to U.S. v. Leon (1984).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
A brief interference with a person's freedom of movement with a duration that can be measured in minutes is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) applied the exclusionary rule to the state court system.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
Miranda warnings must be read to a suspect prior to interrogation.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
39
The term "reasonable expectation of privacy" is most relevant to which of the following police activities?

A) Search
B) Seizure
C) Arrest
D) Stop
E) Interrogation
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
40
Miranda warnings must be issued in written form and signed or initialed by the suspect.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
41
A written statement of fact, supported by oath or affirmation and submitted to judicial officers to fulfill the requirements of probable cause for obtaining a warrant, is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
42
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in __________ that the totality of circumstance test should be used for determining the existence of probable cause.

A) Illinois v. Gates
B) Map v. Ohio
C) Roper v. Simmons
D) Hannity v. Patrick
E) Mapp v. Ohio
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
43
When sufficient evidence is available to support the reasonable conclusion that a person has committed a crime, then a police officer may claim to have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) exigent circumstances.
C) probable cause.
D) justifiable intent.
E) permission to act.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
44
The phrase "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" may be found in which Amendment?

A) First
B) Fourth
C) Fifth
D) Sixth
E) Eighth
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
45
Which of the following statements about search warrants is false?

A) Police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) Police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) Police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) Police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) Police officers need a search warrant even if a person waives his or her Fourth Amendment rights.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
46
Excessive use of force violates the _________ Amendment?

A) First
B) Second
C) Third
D) Fourth
E) Fifth
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
47
_______ ruled that police can systematically stop drivers in order to seek information.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
48
In United States v. Jones (2012)  the Supreme Court decided:

A) to make it a  requirement for the police to seek search warrants, if possible, before taking involuntary blood tests from suspected drunk drivers.
B) police do not need a warrant to search a car.
C) ​ that placing a GPS tracking device on a drug suspect's car without a warrant is a search that falls under the rules of the Fourth Amendment.
D) that arrest, even on minor offenses, makes people subject to intrusive strip searches and body cavity inspections when they are placed in jail.
E) that drug-sniffing dogs cannot be brought to the front door of a home to seek evidence that will be used to get a search warrant.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
49
In what circumstance is the totality of circumstances used?

A) To determine whether an offender is guilty
B) To determine whether to indict a suspect
C) To determine whether probable cause exists
D) To determine whether police acted appropriately
E) To determine whether to Mirandize a suspect
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
50
Police officers seeking a warrant must present a(n) ______ to a judge .

A) arrest
B) affidavit
C) affluence
D) affinity
E) testament
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
51
The _________ doctrine permits officers to notice and use as evidence items that are visible to them when they are in a location that they are permitted to be.

A) plain view
B) public safety
C) exigent circumstances
D) stop and frisk
E) Miranda
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
52
A flexible test established by the Supreme Court for identifying whether probable cause exists that permits the judge to determine whether the available evidence is both sufficient and reliable enough to issue a warrant is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
53
Someone who places a personal diary in a locked drawer within a bedroom of her home has demonstrated:

A) conditional acceptance.
B) adverse conditions.
C) a reasonable expectation of privacy.
D) strict scrutiny.
E) permissible behavior.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
54
Which U.S. Supreme Court case ruled that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless necessary to prevent their escape and unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of serious injury?

A) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
C) Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
D) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
E) Roper v. Simmons (2005)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
55
Illinois v. Gates (1983) is the U.S.Supreme Court decision that established that:

A) police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) the flexible  totality of circumstances  test for determining the  existence of the probable  cause needed for obtaining a  search warrant.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
56
A significant deprivation of liberty, involving taking a person into custody, transporting them to a police station or jail, and processing them into the criminal justice system, is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
57
To obtain an arrest warrant, police must demonstrate:

A) reasonable expectation.
B) reasonable suspicion.
C) probable cause.
D) the exclusionary rule.
E) preponderance of the evidence.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
58
The majority of searches take place without:

A) a search.
B) a seizure.
C) a warrant.
D) an arrest.
E) permission.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
59
Which of the following is not a condition for the issuance of a warrant?

A) the existence of probable cause
B) the suspect must be informed of his/her rights
C) evidence must be presented to the judicial officer and be supported by "oath or affirmation,"
D) the warrant must describe the specific place to be searched
E) the warrant must describe the person or items to be seized
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
60
In order for a stop to be permissible, officers must have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) probable cause.
C) legal insight.
D) preponderance of the evidence.
E) reasonable doubt.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
61
Terry v. Ohio endorsed:

A) warrantless searches for weapons.
B) victim's rights.
C) stop-and-frisk searches.
D) due process requirements.
E) witness safety procedures.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
62
Which would not permit a warrantless search?

A) Driving across the Canadian-U.S. border.
B) Sailing through a border seaport.
C) Suspicion of drugs in a known addict's apartment .
D) An international airport.
E) ​ Driving across the Mexican-U.S. border.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
63
A ________ search allows officers to conduct a permissible warrantless search of a person, vehicle, home, or location after receiving permission from the person in question.

A) no knock
B) consent
C) nonconsent
D) permissible
E) Terry
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
64
The Supreme Court decision that endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested was:

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013).
B) Bailey v. United States (2013).
C) Chimel v. California (1969).
D) Maryland v. King (2013).
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
65
When there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant.  This is termed:

A) exigent circumstances.
B) the exclusionary rule.
C) due process.
D) totality of circumstances.
E) probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
66
In which U.S. Supreme Court case was it established that criminal defendants must be read their rights?

A) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
B) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
C) Chimel v. California (1969)
D) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
67
According to the Supreme Court, exigent circumstances might exist when:

A) officers believe they might find important evidence.
B) officers believe there is probable cause.
C) officers believe others might be in grave danger.
D) officers do not want to wait for a warrant.
E) officers are friendly with the suspects.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
68
_______ ruled that random stops by officers on patrol are not constitutional.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
69
Which of the following types of searches is related to the search of an automobile?

A) Consent search.
B) Sobriety checkpoint.
C) Inventory search.
D) Plain view search.
E) Search incident to an arrest
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
70
In which case did the Supreme Court endorse a police officer's authority to stop-and-frisk suspects on the streets when there is reasonable suspicion that they are armed and involved in criminal activity.

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013)
B) Bailey v. United States (2013)
C) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
D) Maryland v. King (2013)
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
71
In the case of U.S. v. Drayton (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers:

A) must notify citizens they have the right to say "no" to a search.
B) must notify a citizen of his/her right against self-incrimination.
C) must notify a citizen of his/her right to an attorney.
D) are not obligated to notify citizens they have a right to say "no" to a search.
E) are not obligated to read citizens their rights prior to arrest.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
72
Terry v. Ohio endorsed stop-and-frisk searches to ensure _______.

A) officer safety
B) victim's rights
C) suspect rights
D) due process
E) witness safety
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
73
According to ________, a suspect who, during a frisk, which is not justified by proper observation and reasonable suspicion , is found to be carrying drugs or weapons can seek to have the evidence excluded.

A) exigent circumstances
B) the exclusionary rule
C) due process
D) the totality of circumstances
E) probable cause
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
74
Which of the following is not a required component of the Miranda warnings?

A) Notification that suspects have the right to an attorney during interrogation.
B) Notification that suspects have the right to remain silent.
C) Notification that any statement suspects make can be used against them in court.
D) Notification that the state will pay for an attorney if suspects cannot afford one.
E) Notification that suspects have the right to a speedy trial.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
75
Which of the following is not a way to legally conduct a search without a warrant?

A) Special needs search
B) Stop-and-frisk search
C) Automobile search
D) Supervisor enforced search
E) Witness statement search
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
76
A "pat down" search is also known as a _________ search.

A) stop-and-frisk
B) Miranda
C) reasonable suspicion
D) totality of circumstances
E) plain view
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
77
Which two decisions by the Court laid the foundation for Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

A) Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Massiah v. U. S. (1964)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
C) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
D) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Rochin v. California (1952)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1957) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
78
Permissible warrantless search of a vehicle that has been impounded so that police can make a record of the items contained in the vehicle is known as a(n):

A) plain view search.
B) probable cause search.
C) inventory search.
D) seizure.
E) search incident to arrest.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
79
In ________, the Supreme Court endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested.

A) Mapp v. Ohio
B) Terry v. Ohio
C) Chimel v. Ohio
D) Chimel v. California
E) Roper v. Simmons
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
80
During a traffic stop, officers can order passengers as well as the driver to exit the vehicle, even if there is no basis for suspicion that the passengers engaged in any wrongdoing according to:

A) Carroll v. U.S. (1925)
B) Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990)
C) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
D) Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
E) California v. Acevedo (1991)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 141 flashcards in this deck.