The 2009 Appellate Court Ruling in Plame Wilson V

Multiple Choice

The 2009 appellate court ruling in Plame Wilson v.Central Intelligence Agency best illustrates the point that

A) government employees who sign secrecy agreements may be subject to prior restraints.
B) community censorship of the speech of government employees is unconstitutional.
C) jury nullification is a key problem in cases involving the Central Intelligence Agency.
D) the access theory supports the disclosure of Central Intelligency Agency documents.