Multiple Choice
In two of Koch's postulates (#2 and #3) , a pure culture of the organism is required. Which of the following would NOT be a possible consequence of using a contaminated culture?
A) You can't necessarily attribute the illness directly to the microbe in question-it may in fact be caused by the contaminating microbe.
B) There's the possibility that the test animal might be acutely susceptible to the contaminating microbe, but completely resistant to the microbe you suspect causes the illness of interest. As such, when you introduce it into the test animal, it could confuse your final results.
C) The problem is that one microbe may be toxic to the other. It may have killed all of your suspect microbe in the culture. Therefore, you can't be sure that you're infecting your test animals with the microbe you suspect is causing the illness, or if it's only the 2nd (contaminating) microbe.
D) Even though there's a contaminating microbe present, so long as the original suspect microbe is also present, the disease should still manifest in test animals. It should also still be recoverable from test animals following infection. As such, there's really no consequence to using a contaminated culture.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Attributes of an organism that promote pathogenicity
Q14: An example of genetic variation used in
Q30: The series of steps used to connect
Q34: The damage caused by parasites may be
Q47: Which is true about superantigens?<br>A)They are a
Q51: Disease(s) in which the causative agent becomes
Q53: Which of the following is true about
Q56: Which of the following would be considered
Q60: The infectious dose of most pathogens is
Q60: Organisms that are found together and interact